-
10-07-2015, 09:32 AM
#6311
Originally Posted by NewGuy
Yes, I am encouarging him to put the money in a company whose growth prospects are beyond any reasonable doubt. Xero, conversely, is more likely to fail than succeed at this point (IMH0).
Thus, one is a recommendation that is 99% safe, and the other closer to 10%.
totally different, but nice try mate.
I didn't realise you were an Authorised Financial Adviser. Please post your disclosure statement.
Section 10 When person gives financial advice
(1) A person (A) gives financial advice if A makes a recommendation or gives an opinion in relation to acquiring or disposing of (including refraining from acquiring or disposing of) a financial product.
(2) Whether or not advice is financial advice for the purposes of this Act is not affected by how the advice is given or communicated.
(3) However, a person does not give financial advice for the purposes of this Act merely by—
(a) providing information (for example, the cost or terms and conditions of a financial product); or
(b) making a recommendation or giving an opinion relating to a class of financial products; or
(c) making a recommendation or giving an opinion about the procedure for acquiring or disposing of a financial product; or
(d) transmitting the financial advice of another person (unless A gives A’s own financial advice in doing so or holds out the transmitted financial advice as A’s own financial advice); or
(e) recommending that a person consult a financial adviser.
'I often quote myself. It adds spice to my conversation.' - G B Shaw
-
10-07-2015, 09:37 AM
#6312
Originally Posted by NewGuy
Don't try to get all lawyer-y smart with me. I've survived hours of cross exam by people far smarter than you, and this is just boring.
It's too late, I already did and you lost.
'I often quote myself. It adds spice to my conversation.' - G B Shaw
-
10-07-2015, 09:47 AM
#6313
Originally Posted by NewGuy
yeah, amazing. I can see why you are so successful and spend an inordinate amount of your life on here spouting absolute rubbish. Most successful lawyers I know are far too busy for that. Shame.
Bye
Why the tantrum? Seemed a fair question.
If you are recommending investments then you should do so in a way consistent with the relevant legislation.
Note that people sensitive to such obligations, "successful lawyers" included, go to minimal lengths to make it clear that they are NOT providing advice or recommending investments, and ask that others do their own research, etc.
warthog ... muddy and smelly
-
10-07-2015, 10:31 AM
#6314
Moosie
@roddrury
As a leader it's important to set the right example and dress appropriately at all times
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
-
10-07-2015, 01:56 PM
#6315
Originally Posted by winner69
Moosie
@roddrury
As a leader it's important to set the right example and dress appropriately at all times
OMG that jumper has caused a 4% lift in the SP so far today.
-
10-07-2015, 02:15 PM
#6316
Originally Posted by axe
OMG that jumper has caused a 4% lift in the SP so far today.
Hahahaha that's just sad
-
10-07-2015, 02:30 PM
#6317
Rod is not giving a subtle hint that XRO are going to take over Canada is he?
-
10-07-2015, 02:56 PM
#6318
Maybe he's trying to attract Moosie onto his team.
-
10-07-2015, 07:43 PM
#6319
Originally Posted by warthog
If you are recommending investments then you should do so in a way consistent with the relevant legislation.
Note that people sensitive to such obligations, "successful lawyers" included, go to minimal lengths to make it clear that they are NOT providing advice or recommending investments, and ask that others do their own research, etc.
One might argue that the value of any investment is equal to the discounted sum of future cashflows. Since Xero has no positive cashflows, nor any plans to have any, there is a legitimate argument that Xero is not an investment at all. So maybe to be fair, this thread should be moved from the 'NZX' to the 'Off market' section of the forum?
SNOOPY
Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7
-
10-07-2015, 07:57 PM
#6320
Originally Posted by Snoopy
One might argue that the value of any investment is equal to the discounted sum of future cashflows. Since Xero has no positive cashflows, nor any plans to have any, there is a legitimate argument that Xero is not an investment at all. So maybe to be fair, this thread should be moved from the 'NZX' to the 'Off market' section of the forum?
SNOOPY
Snoops - you need to get up to speed with modern financial thinking
These days DCFs are calculated on 10 (or 15) year cash flows plus a Terminal Value = 50% of GD where GD is the value attributed for gaining domination globally assuming no more investment needed (GD is usually a very big number)
On that basis XRO, even with 10 to 15 years of negative cash flows, is valued at $50-$60
(Note - the more sophisticate practioners do apply a discount of say 20% to allow for the possible / likely entry of a new disruptive technology that would make XRO irrelevant)
Last edited by winner69; 10-07-2015 at 08:02 PM.
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks