sharetrader
Page 204 of 971 FirstFirst ... 104154194200201202203204205206207208214254304704 ... LastLast
Results 2,031 to 2,040 of 9702
  1. #2031
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    Thanks mate, now you mention it I think you're right, they were talking swing beds between hospital and rest home so you've got a very pertinent question that deserves a proper answer in my opinion.
    Looking forward to hearing the answer.

  2. #2032
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    442

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roger View Post
    Thanks mate, now you mention it I think you're right, they were talking swing beds between hospital and rest home so you've got a very pertinent question that deserves a proper answer in my opinion.
    Looking forward to hearing the answer.
    I wonder if it is to try and have a facility that is dementia free, in order to offer this option to people wanting aged care. Dementia units also requires additional costs and care. I do wonder, valid question for sure.
    Last edited by Food4Thought; 08-08-2014 at 11:58 AM. Reason: correct spelling

  3. #2033
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    8,516

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Food4Thought View Post
    I wonder if it is to try and have a facility that is dementia free, in order to offer this option to people wanting aged care. Dementia units also requires additional costs and care. I do wonder, valid question for sure.
    Dementia units are in lock down and have no effect on the rest of the facility sure there are additional costs but they also obtain additional funding to run them,looking forward to hearing their explanation although I doubt it will cut the mustard IMO bye for now off to work in a dementia unit.

  4. #2034
    The past is practise. Vaygor1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Northland
    Posts
    923

    Default

    Back in November 2013 this Ellerslie site was going to contain 252 units and 79 care beds in 3 x 6-7 story buildings plus 1 x 4-story buiilding as per the council submission. Refer http://www.propbd.co.nz/summerset-se...rslie-village/

    Announcement today, the village will include 250 units, including townhouses, villas, apartments, and care beds to house 400 residence. Interesting to see if the 6-7 story buildings are still in there.

    400 people in 250 units means 1.6 per facility
    If say 50 care beds. That leaves 200 units for 350 people = 1.75 meaning 3 out of 4 townhouses/villas/apartments are expected to contain a couple. Is that realistic?

    Also of note is the timeframe to get consent. And questions over SUM's ability to groom the authorities and the local community, and to submit realistically acceptable plans.
    Last edited by Vaygor1; 08-08-2014 at 12:28 PM. Reason: Added the 4-story building

  5. #2035
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vaygor1 View Post
    Back in November 2013 this Ellerslie site was going to contain 252 units and 79 care beds in 3 x 6-7 story buildings plus 1 x 4-story buiilding as per the council submission. Refer http://www.propbd.co.nz/summerset-se...rslie-village/

    Announcement today, the village will include 250 units, including townhouses, villas, apartments, and care beds to house 400 residence. Interesting to see if the 6-7 story buildings are still in there.

    400 people in 250 units means 1.6 per facility
    If say 50 care beds. That leaves 200 units for 350 people = 1.75 meaning 3 out of 4 townhouses/villas/apartments are expected to contain a couple. Is that realistic?

    Also of note is the timeframe to get consent. And questions over SUM's ability to groom the authorities and the local community, and to submit realistically acceptable plans.
    I'm with you. This appears considerably less ambitious than the original proposal and the time to get consent was lengthy. Auckland city council have too much power and are an absolute bloody nightmare to deal with. Its clear the market is unimpressed.
    Last edited by Beagle; 08-08-2014 at 01:06 PM.

  6. #2036
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    They're still waiting for a zoning change for their lower hutt proposed development and I hear they're facing fierce opposition from the locals to a high-rise development there.
    Last edited by Beagle; 08-08-2014 at 04:03 PM.

  7. #2037
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,986

    Default

    Tomorrow big day. We find out how much they made on the 195 sales (wouldn't have made anything out of operating a village)

    I reckon $14m - up 40% odd on last year. There was pretty big increase in unrealised gains the last 2 quarters and these got to come out sometime
    Last edited by winner69; 11-08-2014 at 11:48 AM.

  8. #2038
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    I'll bet you a beer it'll be less than that

  9. #2039
    The past is practise. Vaygor1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Northland
    Posts
    923

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Tomorrow big day. We find out how much they made on the 195 sales (wouldn't have made anything out of operating a village)

    I reckon $14m - up 40% odd on last year. There was pretty big increase in unrealised gains the last 2 quarters and these got to come out sometime
    I might be misunderstanding the post, but I thought unrealised gains would take an average of 7 years to come out; the average time between sale and resale of any given unit.

  10. #2040
    IMO
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Floating Anchor Shoals
    Posts
    9,758

    Default

    From a broker with a Neutral "SUM is due to release its 1H14 result on 12 August 2014 and we expect a flat underlyingresult. Operating cost increases are expected as SUM scales up head office capability forthe next level of growth and a 2H14 bias for new sales and resales. We will review ourNEUTRAL rating with the result given the sharp share price correction; however a lack ofnear-term earnings momentum continues to be a risk factor for investors. "

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •