sharetrader
Page 895 of 970 FirstFirst ... 395795845885891892893894895896897898899905945 ... LastLast
Results 8,941 to 8,950 of 9699
  1. #8941
    Veteran novice
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    7,289

    Default

    Perhaps in 12 months time a quarter of no growth - but an avoidance of negative growth - will be something to celebrate.


  2. #8942
    Investor / Wizard / Mall Santa Pricey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by traineeinvestor View Post
    Not ac comment on SUM specifically, but I don't understand why companies emphasise "facility headroom" and "undrawn facilities" etc. so much. The banks can always cut a credit facility and if they think a company is under pressure they'll do it pretty quickly (just as they have done in every economic contraction).
    Banks can't cancel committed facilities. They only have an "out" in very limited circumstances i.e. illegality to fund, event of default etc. (this includes something which has a material adverse impact on the business, but let's not mention that).
    "His loyalty couldn't be bought at any price; but it could be rented remarkably cheaply."

  3. #8943
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trader_jackson View Post
    I was going to post about how this is the 3rd first quarter in a row of virtually no growth (aka FY18, FY19 and FY20 first quarters are all basically the same, and FY17 was actually higher than FY20 first quarter is today)... how the market could possibly like it... but I suppose the share price itself has done the talking. After an initial pump and dump, and on a day when most retirement operators are up alot, SUM is in the red. I'd expect this to trade at no more than NTA ($5.02) at best... yet its nearly 20% higher today.

    Clearly sum still have hope this company (with its weak care offering) will pull a rabbit out of a hat.
    I'm not one of them any longer. MET my top pick in this sector at the moment, then OCA. I'd own ARV in a heartbeat over SUM and anyone paying more than 2 1/2 times NTA for RYM in the current environment has rocks in their head in my opinion.
    Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.
    Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine

  4. #8944
    Membaa
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    5,322

    Default

    COVID-19 Wage Subsidy Employer Search

    Business Name Number of employees paid Total amount paid Last updated
    SUMMERSET MANAGEMENT GROUP LIMITED 1344 $8,870,544.00 08/04/2020

  5. #8945
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,856

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Baa_Baa View Post
    COVID-19 Wage Subsidy Employer Search

    Business Name Number of employees paid Total amount paid Last updated
    SUMMERSET MANAGEMENT GROUP LIMITED 1344 $8,870,544.00 08/04/2020
    Well, beagle did say they were a no growth company.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  6. #8946
    Membaa
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    5,322

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Baa_Baa View Post
    COVID-19 Wage Subsidy Employer Search

    Business Name Number of employees paid Total amount paid Last updated
    SUMMERSET MANAGEMENT GROUP LIMITED 1344 $8,870,544.00 08/04/2020
    From MSD "you need to know whether your business has had a 30% decline in revenue" so assuming SUM have got the payout, we shareholders should expect 'at least' a 30% decline in revenue in the current reporting period. $8.87m of easy money granted to offset against employment costs (which per employee will be a great deal more), still a good thing.

    But basically a forecast loss of revenue, not sure how they could lose 30%+ revenue per se with essentially a fixed income. Maybe some clever convoluted SUM accounting which they're renowned for conflating 'revenue' from ORA and care fees to include development margins? dyodd. Scott didn't get CFO of the year for nothing, clever guy, take the easy govt money, tidy up the revenue story later.

    No other listed retirement company has received the subsidy, as far as I can see. May have applied though.

  7. #8947
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,856

    Default

    It’s great that in these desperate times of falling revenues Summerset have made a huge commitment to keep 1,344 employees on the payroll and retain them for at least 12 weeks. No job losses in the short term - that’s good.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  8. #8948
    Veteran novice
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    7,289

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    It’s great that in these desperate times of falling revenues Summerset have made a huge commitment to keep 1,344 employees on the payroll and retain them for at least 12 weeks. No job losses in the short term - that’s good.
    Yes, success in the retirement village business relies heavily on the quality of its people, never more so than in times like this!


  9. #8949
    Guru justakiwi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Canterbury
    Posts
    2,569

    Default

    Regardless of falling revenue the only areas of staffing reduction they could make, would be top level/back office positions. There is no way in hell they could reduce staffing in caregiving, housekeeping, kitchen, laundry. Most of those areas would already be working on minimum staffing levels so cutting them would mean a significant drop in the quality of care/service. Without their “hands on” staff, they have no business.

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    It’s great that in these desperate times of falling revenues Summerset have made a huge commitment to keep 1,344 employees on the payroll and retain them for at least 12 weeks. No job losses in the short term - that’s good.

  10. #8950
    always learning ... BlackPeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    9,497

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by justakiwi View Post
    Regardless of falling revenue the only areas of staffing reduction they could make, would be top level/back office positions. There is no way in hell they could reduce staffing in caregiving, housekeeping, kitchen, laundry. Most of those areas would already be working on minimum staffing levels so cutting them would mean a significant drop in the quality of care/service. Without their “hands on” staff, they have no business.
    You are right re front line staff, and to be honest, I don't see that much back office staff surplus to requirements either. Given that they can't close down villages - bills still need to be sent out as well as paid, staff needs to be paid, subsidies need to be applied for.

    Maybe they need a handful less of bowling green coordinators and gym managers (with these activities closed down), but more than 1300 people?

    On the other hand - SUM is not just running retirement villages, they are developing and building them. I suppose this activity was grinding to a rapid halt with the lock down. Builders, carpenters, plumbers, electricians, painters and other tradespeople as well as sales staff now all busy twiddling their thumbs thanks to the lock down instead of developing the next set of units. Pretty sure that these are the people SUM applied for the wage subsidy - and rightly so.
    Last edited by BlackPeter; 11-04-2020 at 04:43 PM.
    ----
    "Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •