sharetrader
Page 371 of 970 FirstFirst ... 271321361367368369370371372373374375381421471871 ... LastLast
Results 3,701 to 3,710 of 9700
  1. #3701
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    230

    Default

    no, the bet is that SUM will grow much quicker than RYM over the next 5 years, not that it will be bigger than RYM in 5 years!

  2. #3702
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    LA/ChCh/AKL
    Posts
    1,231

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by couta1 View Post
    Life is fragile, one of us may not be around by then to collect but hey I'd be happy to take a wager that Ryman will still be top dog in 5 years time.
    So true, life and even companies are fragile, anyone for a wager they will keep growing at 44% pa underlying earnings for the next five years??

  3. #3703
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    68

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Raz View Post
    anyone for a wager they will keep growing at 44% pa underlying earnings for the next five years??
    I think it would be foolish to assume that growth rate, but as Roger pointed out a more modest CAGR of 22% (very conservative for the next 5 years imo) would be more inline as growth tails off with larger operations.

  4. #3704
    Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    4,766

    Default

    Last 3 years sp: SUM ahead; MET not far behind; RYM below the NZX50 performance. Chart courtesy of the FT.com site.
    Attachment 8229

  5. #3705
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    230

    Default

    That chart looks funny. They don't all start from the same point, so not really a valid comparison

  6. #3706
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    68

    Default

    They start together at 0% at the XY origin at the end 1/3 of the graph. Overall it is just zoomed out a little to get the grand scheme of things

  7. #3707
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    230

    Default

    which means that its not actually comparing performance over the last three years as stated, then

  8. #3708
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fox View Post
    I think it would be foolish to assume that growth rate, but as Roger pointed out a more modest CAGR of 22% (very conservative for the next 5 years imo) would be more inline as growth tails off with larger operations.
    The dog has been known to be conservative from time to time, not usually around the food bowl LOL

  9. #3709
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,868

    Default

    FWIW

    Last 2 years they returned as follows:
    RYM +23.11%
    MET +37.15%
    SUM +86.83%

    5 year comparison
    MET +193.50%
    RYM +264.09%
    SUM +281.88%

    discl. obviously happy as I hold all 3

  10. #3710
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silu View Post
    FWIW

    Last 2 years they returned as follows:
    RYM +23.11%
    MET +37.15%
    SUM +86.83%

    5 year comparison
    MET +193.50%
    RYM +264.09%
    SUM +281.88%

    discl. obviously happy as I hold all 3
    The five year thing underscores the veracity of the business model IMO. Food for thought. In what other business is the vast majority of the profit tax free...handy having that IRD ruling on tax free resale of occupation licences isn't it !

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •