-
27-03-2017, 05:07 PM
#4271
Originally Posted by Roger
Hmmmmmmm. Well my base case is 2017 underlying earnings of 32 cps, see post #4267 above. At $5 it trades on a current year PE of only 15.6 ! I think this is absurd considering their track record since listing and the demographic tailwinds favoring the sector for at least the next 25 years.
Let it come down a bit more and I'll have to consider doing a Couta1
Do it mate, you know overdiversification is highly overrated.
-
27-03-2017, 05:39 PM
#4272
Keeping powder dry at this stage mate. Lets see what Julian Cook has to say on 27 April on the record during the meeting and any other information we can "hound" him for afterwards
If it wants to fall further between now and then I won't be one of the ones panic selling.
Last edited by Beagle; 27-03-2017 at 05:43 PM.
Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.”
Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine
-
27-03-2017, 05:51 PM
#4273
My only concern is if there is a big housing correction how much the SP will fall. It's clear people will sell this down if that happens.
-
27-03-2017, 07:32 PM
#4274
Only 8% off recent high .......but those holding whose actions are guided by 100MA and 200MA must be getting a bit tetchy
Last edited by winner69; 27-03-2017 at 07:34 PM.
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
-
27-03-2017, 08:15 PM
#4275
Member
Originally Posted by JeremyALD
My only concern is if there is a big housing correction how much the SP will fall. It's clear people will sell this down if that happens.
A look at the charts tells me that RYM,SUM and MET appear to all have got LOWER highs in Mar 17 after peaking in Sep 16, perhaps starting a downtrend.
One question is on my mind regarding this sector which I haven't seen discussed here: In 2014 aged care worker Christine Bartlett won her case for equal pay in women dominated professions which could greatly affect the cost structure of rest home care. This is slowly working its way through legislation at the moment.
Do posters here see this change affecting the profitabilities of the rest home village operators in a major way??
-
27-03-2017, 08:24 PM
#4276
No as the majority of their profits are made in developement and resales.
-
27-03-2017, 08:32 PM
#4277
Originally Posted by winner69
Only 8% off recent high .......but those holding whose actions are guided by 100MA and 200MA must be getting a bit tetchy
That lower high put in a top that set a new down trend line. I had to delete all my trend lines and channels which were previously pretty reliable, and reset them, currently the long term up trend (log scale) is around about 4.80 so todays close is nearby though that's still below all the major MA/EMA's. Interesting for the TA's, the recent low was smack on the 38.2% fib retrace.
I wonder whether SUM is doing the RYM thing, that Roger and Winner talked about for a few years and has played out pretty much as they described ... that SUM in this case, might have got hyped to perfection and is now trying to find fair value again. The market may be forward looking but it's not stupid enough to ignore the ST ramping effect when there's plenty profits to be scalped.
Anyway, there's a ton of support at those MA/EMA's below here and the longer term rising trend line. If it naffed all of those then that would be a source of concern, otherwise as they say a 'healthy correction' (gag).
-
27-03-2017, 08:48 PM
#4278
Member
Originally Posted by percy
No as the majority of their profits are made in developement and resales.
Yes, but what happens if their wage bill goes up by 10-15% because of this - especially for operators who can't immediately
pass on those costs because they guarantee to 'never raise the fees' during occupancy (Ryman, I believe).
-
27-03-2017, 08:54 PM
#4279
Originally Posted by percy
No as the majority of their profits are made in developement and resales.
It could have the potential to hit companies with less development involvement, but this would be overridden by the necessity of the Govt to increase its funding level to the sector to stop the not for profits going to the wall.
-
27-03-2017, 08:58 PM
#4280
Originally Posted by sideline
Yes, but what happens if their wage bill goes up by 10-15% because of this - especially for operators who can't immediately
pass on those costs because they guarantee to 'never raise the fees' during occupancy (Ryman, I believe).
Your mixing up the fees payable by those in Apartments(No rise guarantee) with fees for the care centre residents(Rise annually as set by the DHB's)
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks