sharetrader
Page 474 of 970 FirstFirst ... 374424464470471472473474475476477478484524574 ... LastLast
Results 4,731 to 4,740 of 9699
  1. #4731
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,838

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Paper Tiger View Post
    Last August they touted the increased bank facility of $450m to cover future build

    But if SUM offer bonds it must be a good thing
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  2. #4732
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,838

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trader_jackson View Post
    hmm bit confusing as I thought they could have easily gone to the banks for cash?

    The banks not wanting to lend anymore (for now) to the highest leverage village maybe so going to the market for debt?

    Likely have the above completely wrong
    Maybe positioning themselves for a takeover of Arvida

    Had to say that t_j
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  3. #4733
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    8,516

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by percy View Post
    Bond issue makes very good sense to me.
    Gives them another funding avenue other than banks.
    Six years is a good time frame.
    A first for the retirement sector in NZ, but hey why not be different, I reckon these bonds will be quite desirable.

  4. #4734
    Guru
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,601

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Last August they touted the increased bank facility of $450m to cover future build

    But if SUM offer bonds it must be a good thing
    SUMthing doesn't quite sound right... I thought, given SUM's great track record of underlying NPAT growth (which can only ever continue, right?) banks would be bending over backwards to throw cash at this "safe as houses" investment, that is Summerset? (as they do boast every now and then how fantastic their debt facilities are...)
    Now they seem to have gone cold on the idea... wonder what changed their mind?

    winner69 you could be onto something... maybe they need it for the $2.50 takeover offer for that old dog that listed late 2014 at 95 cents?
    Last edited by trader_jackson; 30-05-2017 at 12:16 PM.

  5. #4735
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    8,516

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Last August they touted the increased bank facility of $450m to cover future build

    But if SUM offer bonds it must be a good thing
    No mate, their bank facility now stands at $600m.

  6. #4736
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    8,516

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trader_jackson View Post
    SUMthing doesn't quite sound right... I thought, given SUM's great track record of underlying NPAT growth banks would only be to happy to throw cash at SUM? (as mentioned last August)
    Now they seem to have gone cold on the idea... wonder what changed their mind?
    Your continual knocking of the stock is growing weariSUM, how about giving that ARV thread a good old ramp aye.

  7. #4737
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,838

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by couta1 View Post
    No mate, their bank facility now stands at $600m.
    Thats right ... increased from to $600m

    My bad
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  8. #4738
    Guru
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,601

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by couta1 View Post
    Your continual knocking of the stock is growing weariSUM, how about giving that ARV thread a good old ramp aye.
    I prefer to ask objective questions, or make objective statements (most of the time ), rather than ramp up a stock, particularly if that ramp is based on (likely) flawed "alternative facts" (ie opinions presented as facts)

  9. #4739
    Guru
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,601

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    C'mon tj - you getting a bit emotional. Your hate for SUM (and love of ARV) makes you sound like an unreasonable person
    Even Arvida had this as one of the main risks for investing in them

    Property market risk: The Arvida Group’s future financial performance will be impacted by any decline in the property*market conditions or valuation methodologies etc etc:
    Never said Arvida didn't have this risk... (although others on here have said this isn't a risk?)
    ARV just has ALOT less debt (as a %)... I know it, we know it, everybody knows it folks

  10. #4740
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    Very smart move by SUM. Julian Cook obviously using his investment banking background to diversify the funding base and locking in further funding for strong ongoing growth at close to 50 year interest rate lows. This together with the recently expanded $600m bank facility will provide a LOT OF HEADROOM for opportunities for land banking purchases at low prices if the market turns down.
    The irony is this opportunity will probably appeal a lot to existing residents.
    Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.
    Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •