sharetrader
  1. #16791
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Bolivia.
    Posts
    4,933

  2. #16792
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,895

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sideshow Bob View Post
    Thanks for that link-its good journalism-brief and covers 2 opposing views.
    The mislead Greenies saying its good news as we do not need more fossil fuel .Hypocrites that do not know the difference between coal and gas.
    Andrew whiley who says they will be back-its just a matter of drilling the right hole in the right place at the right time.
    NZO are lucky having OGOG leading them with the capability to do this

  3. #16793
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,881

    Default

    And all the while Japan is expanding its coal operated generators to create more energy in the wake of Fukushima. Demand for coal and oil (globally) will continue unabated in the coming 30 years.

  4. #16794
    Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,886

    Default

    Cue update on Mahato: https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20200225/pdf/44ff76pkyrbkt5.pdf

    I just want to know what the hell is going on here.

    Clearly a discovery has been made - but what has happened that Texcal think they can just cut their JV partner out? They must have some reasoning but Christ only knows what it is.

    Anyone have any other sources of info on this or good old scuttlebutt?

  5. #16795
    FEAR n GREED JBmurc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Central Otago
    Posts
    8,486

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mistaTea View Post
    Cue update on Mahato: https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20200225/pdf/44ff76pkyrbkt5.pdf

    I just want to know what the hell is going on here.

    Clearly a discovery has been made - but what has happened that Texcal think they can just cut their JV partner out? They must have some reasoning but Christ only knows what it is.

    Anyone have any other sources of info on this or good old scuttlebutt?
    Surely its pretty straight forward like the ann. below back in DEC....


    Melbourne, Australia 17 December 2019: Cue Energy Resources Limited (CUE or Company) advises that the claimed cash call from the Operator of the Mahato PSC, Texcal Mahato EP Ltd, which was the subject of the disputed default notice referred to in the ASX announcement of 10th Dec 2019, has been paid by Cue. Cue is not receiving information from the Operator as required under the Joint Operating Agreement and is evaluating all available options to address this and other breaches under this agreement.

    -Even though CUE disputed the extra cash call from 'Texcal" they still paid the bribe !! (or didn't they ???)

    why ask for extra funds then once received still not uphold the J/V ? ... and now state the J/V is void ... what utter BS!!! scumbag sand jockeys
    "With a good perspective on history, we can have a better understanding of the past and present, and thus a clear vision of the future." — Carlos Slim Helu

  6. #16796
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,895

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JBmurc View Post
    Surely its pretty straight forward like the ann. below back in DEC....


    Melbourne, Australia 17 December 2019: Cue Energy Resources Limited (CUE or Company) advises that the claimed cash call from the Operator of the Mahato PSC, Texcal Mahato EP Ltd, which was the subject of the disputed default notice referred to in the ASX announcement of 10th Dec 2019, has been paid by Cue. Cue is not receiving information from the Operator as required under the Joint Operating Agreement and is evaluating all available options to address this and other breaches under this agreement.

    -Even though CUE disputed the extra cash call from 'Texcal" they still paid the bribe !! (or didn't they ???)

    why ask for extra funds then once received still not uphold the J/V ? ... and now state the J/V is void ... what utter BS!!! scumbag sand jockeys
    From what I can tell its just a spat.Little more than can be expected doing business in Indonesia.There are always 2 sides to a story and clearly Cue are not going to tell us how this has come about.Look at the directors on Cue.Look at how they have behaved with NZO and the scheme of arrangement.Its too early to make judgments until we hear the truth as seen by both sides

  7. #16797
    Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,886

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fish View Post
    From what I can tell its just a spat.Little more than can be expected doing business in Indonesia.There are always 2 sides to a story and clearly Cue are not going to tell us how this has come about.Look at the directors on Cue.Look at how they have behaved with NZO and the scheme of arrangement.Its too early to make judgments until we hear the truth as seen by both sides
    It's true that no matter how flat you make a pancake - it always has two sides!

    Let's just hope Cue haven't screwed the pooch on this one and that whatever the issue is can be resolved.

    Even if Cue were in the wrong, they have since paid up the money Texcal said was owed. Seems incredible that Texcal now seem to be progressing as if Cue was never a JV partner. The fact that there has been a discovery makes me suspicious too. If the same thing happened, but the hole was dry, I am 100% sure Texcal would still treat Cue as a JV partner after the disputed funds were paid! To help with the plugging and abandonment costs!

  8. #16798
    Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,886

    Default

    https://www.nbr.co.nz/story/proposed...rint-says-nzog

    Latest members bill submitted by Green's Chloe Schwarbrick would force all public funds to divest from companies directly involved in the mining and production of oil & gas.

    If it gets through, that would mean our largest minority holder (who played a key role ib stopping the SoA) will be forced to dump their shares.

    ACC would have to forgo the potentially large Ironbark upside, and what will the policy achieve in terms of emission reductions? Either nothing or an increase in emissions from a reduction in gas supply.

    Can we have the election already? These current lot have got to go.

  9. #16799
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,281

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mistaTea View Post
    https://www.nbr.co.nz/story/proposed...rint-says-nzog

    Latest members bill submitted by Green's Chloe Schwarbrick would force all public funds to divest from companies directly involved in the mining and production of oil & gas.

    If it gets through, that would mean our largest minority holder (who played a key role ib stopping the SoA) will be forced to dump their shares.

    ACC would have to forgo the potentially large Ironbark upside, and what will the policy achieve in terms of emission reductions? Either nothing or an increase in emissions from a reduction in gas supply.

    Can we have the election already? These current lot have got to go.
    You do know there is a difference between a 'members bill' and a 'government bill' don't you? First the members bill has to be drawn from the ballot (no guarantee of that happening). Then it has to be passed by parliament (no guarantee of that happening).

    SNOOPY
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

  10. #16800
    Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,886

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snoopy View Post
    You do know there is a difference between a 'members bill' and a 'government bill' don't you? First the members bill has to be drawn from the ballot (no guarantee of that happening). Then it has to be passed by parliament (no guarantee of that happening).

    SNOOPY
    The likelihood of it ever becoming law is not the issue. The issue is that there is this constant push since the last election to make it harder and harder for the O&G industry.

    It is already an unfavourable environment after the offshore ban of future permits. Just by submitting a members bill with the latest crazy idea (whether it ever becomes law or not) adds to the whole notion that NZ is closed for business to would-be explorers.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •