sharetrader
  1. #16041
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Posts
    1,981

    Default

    Interesting comments here the last few days. Nonsensical and probabilities thrown about. The probabilities are sure nonsensical.
    If there is a 1 in 8 chance of success then NZO next drill [ironbank] had better come in as we have used up our quota of dry wells. Now as everyone knows that is nonsensical as a fair coin can be heads or tails as long as it like and the average is still the same over a long enought throwing. What we need to keep clear is that we oilers drill because we always hope for that big one.

    Anyone remember long enough back to the KUPE drilling soon after NZO was floated. The SP rocked up but later came down as it was thought the figures were too optimistic. Fast forward about two decades to the discovery and the size of the well was again near the first guess. We will never probably know the final figure as some idiot [ZETA] sold us out. Anyways why I am bring this up is because in trying to assess the probabilities of success we need to remember that figures can be shifted around to suit making any probability nonsensical.
    I think we should keep nonsensical not too far from our vocabulary because shortly we will be receiving from NZO Mao Tse Tung little red book of facts. Then we will all know the true meaning of nonsensical.
    digger

  2. #16042
    Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,891

    Default

    Interesting to note the CUE Market Cap is currently sitting at AU$74M (NZ$77M).

    So 50% of 77 = NZ$38.5M. Plus, say, NZ$85M of cold hard cash attributable to NZOG.

    Already, that brings us to a total of NZ$123.5M (about 75c/share). We haven't even sold our 4% in Kupe yet, nor factored in any value of Ironbark yet we are already easily above the $102M implied business value that OGOG have offered.

    This booklet and independent valuation we are about to receive soon is going to need to be pretty damned slick indeed - no matter which way I look at it, I just can't seem to get it through my thick skull.
    Last edited by mistaTea; 23-07-2019 at 10:55 AM.

  3. #16043
    Guru Xerof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,005

    Default

    I'm not a NZO holder, but was interested to see the SofA announcement. The first thing you guys need to get clear is whether OGOG is entitled to vote. If they are, it's what is commonly known as a minority squeeze-out, and if ALL directors vote in favour, the pass rate is 50% not 75%

    I know from experience that this type of underhand tactic is common in jurisdictions such as Bermuda - not sure about NZ, and can't find anything from a brief search, but you guys will be motivated to check it out.

    Don't mean to be the fox in the coop, but it's worth finding out early, whether this is already a fait accompli, or not.

    John Pagani might be able to categorically dismiss my line of thought in a moment for you.........

  4. #16044
    Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,891

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xerof View Post
    Don't mean to be the fox in the coop, but it's worth finding out early, whether this is already a fait accompli, or not.

    John Pagani might be able to categorically dismiss my line of thought in a moment for you.........
    Far from a fait accompli.

    Two conditions need to be met for the SoA to pass.

    1. A simple majority (>50%) of the entire shareholder base must participate in the vote; and
    2. Each interest class must achieve a 75% majority in favour. OGOG is one interest class, and the minority shareholders are another. So the main vote that counts for practical purposes is the minority share holders interest class.


    I have had this confirmed by John Pagani.

    Personally, I think the vote has a slim chance of passing in favour of OGOG. Though I stand to be corrected, I imagine that most of the remaining business partners (minority shareholders) still have holdings in NZOG because we believe in the company's future prospects. Otherwise we would have dumped our holdings during the SP spike in 2017 when the Zeta vs OGOG arm wrestle ensued and/or when there was an opportunity to sell to OGOG at 78c/share (minus dividend).

    In other words, if I am right and the majority of the larger minority shareholders like to hold NZOG as a long-term investment (to Hell with the share price in the interim...) then it would take a very generous offer indeed to entice them to forgo the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to drill ironbark.

    We will see soon enough if I am right, or whether or not I need to eat my hat.
    Last edited by mistaTea; 23-07-2019 at 05:22 PM.

  5. #16045
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    103

    Default

    We have a very small holding but will be voting to decline the offer. If OGOG were serious about mopping up the minority shareholders their starting point should have been equal to or higher than their original buy in offer.

  6. #16046
    Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,891

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CD_CHCH View Post
    We have a very small holding but will be voting to decline the offer. If OGOG were serious about mopping up the minority shareholders their starting point should have been equal to or higher than their original buy in offer.
    Agreed 100%

  7. #16047
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Masterton, , NZ.
    Posts
    2,250

    Default

    My thoughts entirely you are spot on!
    Quote Originally Posted by mistaTea View Post
    Interesting to note the CUE Market Cap is currently sitting at AU$74M (NZ$77M).

    So 50% of 77 = NZ$38.5M. Plus, say, NZ$85M of cold hard cash attributable to NZOG.

    Already, that brings us to a total of NZ$123.5M (about 75c/share). We haven't even sold our 4% in Kupe yet, nor factored in any value of Ironbark yet we are already easily above the $102M implied business value that OGOG have offered.

    This booklet and independent valuation we are about to receive soon is going to need to be pretty damned slick indeed - no matter which way I look at it, I just can't seem to get it through my thick skull.

  8. #16048
    IMO
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Floating Anchor Shoals
    Posts
    9,732

    Default

    Thanks all for sharing, great info.. Looks like a unanimous NO!.

  9. #16049
    Senior Member Marilyn Munroe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Hollywood
    Posts
    922

    Default

    Prime Minister Adern banned offshore oil and gas exploration because it was evil.

    Nek minit Revenue Minister Stuart Nash extends the tax break for oil exploration and seismic survey equipment because it is good.

    I'm confused.

    Boop boop de do
    Marilyn

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/pol...-fuel-industry
    Diamonds are a girls best friend.

  10. #16050
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    456

    Default

    Bit odd alright. Sorta like how Port Chalmers was falling all over itself to host the Barque drilling base, nek minit Dunedin is declaring a climate emergency.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •