NZ Oil & Gas (NZO)

[fish]

2410 metres 2 days ago-should be about 1/2 way by now
Relative to previous recent trades a big seller at 0.695
I wonder why?

[RTM]

2410 metres 2 days ago-should be about 1/2 way by now
Relative to previous recent trades a big seller at 0.695
I wonder why?

Mr T wanting to buy more SKY shares ?
Yes...the announcements are economical with the info....and I don't know enough about it....should they be getting some indication from the type of material / rock they are encountering ? No idea.

[mistaTea]

Mr T wanting to buy more SKY shares ?

LOL!

No, I am waiting to hit the jackpot with Ironbark so I can take my gains and then team up with Ogg to launch a Sky TV takeover!

[Davexl]

Anyone have any idea at what depth to expect gas shows, and if they report them?

[Fabs37]

Yes...the announcements are economical with the info....and I don't know enough about it....should they be getting some indication from the type of material / rock they are encountering ? No idea.[/QUOTE]

The reservoir has been explored nearby at comparably
shallower depths and includes discoveries at the Gorgon, Goodwyn and North
Rankin gas condensate fields.

May give some indication???

[Lion]

Davexl - I spent some time trying to find what sort of depth they found hydrocarbons at Gorgon, Goodwyn and North Rankin fields, but without success.
Those fields are pretty huge, and not very far from Ironbark, and if our current drilling intersected their zones, I'd imagine it would definitely be worth an announcement. Not that I am any sort of reservoir expert.
I'd assume a later production well could take h/c from multiple depths, couldn't it?
The really big prize is at 5668m though, as the announcements say.

[fish]

Davexl - I spent some time trying to find what sort of depth they found hydrocarbons at Gorgon, Goodwyn and North Rankin fields, but without success.
Those fields are pretty huge, and not very far from Ironbark, and if our current drilling intersected their zones, I'd imagine it would definitely be worth an announcement. Not that I am any sort of reservoir expert.
I'd assume a later production well could take h/c from multiple depths, couldn't it?
The really big prize is at 5668m though, as the announcements say.

its in the srk consulting report-I have hard copy of this but cannot google it anymore.
Primary targets at tr19 and tr 17 levels-which on the page 9 diagram are massive and deeper than Gorgon/Goodwyn and around 5668m .
They mention secondary targets which do not appear relevant if the primary is unsuccessful.One of these is j29 at around 3000 metres but likely poor seal and gas escape .Another secondary target is TR 14 which is deeper at 6000m plus than the primary.

It would be really good if anyone could post the srk report as I only have it in black and white and would love to see the giant ironbark in red on page 9 !

[Davexl]

Originally Posted by Lion
Davexl - I spent some time trying to find what sort of depth they found hydrocarbons at Gorgon, Goodwyn and North Rankin fields, but without success.
Those fields are pretty huge, and not very far from Ironbark, and if our current drilling intersected their zones, I'd imagine it would definitely be worth an announcement. Not that I am any sort of reservoir expert.
I'd assume a later production well could take h/c from multiple depths, couldn't it?
The really big prize is at 5668m though, as the announcements say.

its in the srk consulting report-I have hard copy of this but cannot google it anymore.
Primary targets at tr19 and tr 17 levels-which on the page 9 diagram are massive and deeper than Gorgon/Goodwyn and around 5668m .
They mention secondary targets which do not appear relevant if the primary is unsuccessful.One of these is j29 at around 3000 metres but likely poor seal and gas escape .Another secondary target is TR 14 which is deeper at 6000m plus than the primary.

It would be really good if anyone could post the srk report as I only have it in black and white and would love to see the giant ironbark in red on page 9 !

Thanks Lion & Fish! Will keep looking for the SRK report, maybe there is a cached copy somewhere. Thanks again...

[CD_CHCH]

Try this link to the Cue site - it contains a report by SRK Consulting:

https://www.cuenrg.com.au/irm/PDF/f5...etingProxyForm

118 page PDF document - SRK report starts on page 58

[Davexl]

Try this link to the Cue site - it contains a report by SRK Consulting:

https://www.cuenrg.com.au/irm/PDF/f5...etingProxyForm

118 page PDF document - SRK report starts on page 58

Nice work CD_CHCH - Thank you...