sharetrader
  1. #10991
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    699

    Default

    well the answer is 3,560,852

  2. #10992
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    417

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bung5 View Post
    well the answer is 3,560,852
    Almost the same number of shares they bought back on market not so long ago! What a joke! If they thought the shares are hugely undervalued, they should have bought back shares on market for the investors participating in DRP.

  3. #10993
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RRR View Post
    Almost the same number of shares they bought back on market not so long ago! What a joke! If they thought the shares are hugely undervalued, they should have bought back shares on market for the investors participating in DRP.
    As NZO have held the view that their shares have been substantially undervalued, it may have been better for NZO shareholders if the DRP was suspended in September 2011 in order to avoid the dilution of shareholder value that results from issuing shares at a price of 67.314 cents. As I recall, in the webcast on the 24th August 2011, Jason Familton of First NZ Capital raised the point about the further dilution of value that could arise in the context of the DRP and the 2 cents dividend declared at that time. That said, it is the average cost paid by NZO to acquire the 3,560,852 shares issued as a consequence of the DRP that ultimately determines the net cost to shareholders of issuing shareholders under the DRP. At yesterdays close of 73 cents, the net cost (excluding brokerage) to shareholders of acquiring the "DRP shares" would be $202,470 (3,560,852 x 5.686 cents (73 cents - 67.314 cents)). However, the actual cost to shareholders will be determined by the actual cost of the shares purchased on or after the 7th November 2011.

    I support the capital management initiated by NZO, and further support confirmation of the payment of an interim dividend upon the release of December 2011 quarterly activities report in late January 2012, or upon the release of the 6 monthly result in February 2012, or even earlier if the sale of Pike River Coal is confirmed before the end of January 2012, and the recovery of both the secured and unsecured debt is achieved.

  4. #10994
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,896

    Default

    I support the capital management initiated by NZO, and further support confirmation of the payment of an interim dividend upon the release of December 2011 quarterly activities report in late January 2012, or upon the release of the 6 monthly result in February 2012, or even earlier if the sale of Pike River Coal is confirmed before the end of January 2012, and the recovery of both the secured and unsecured debt is achieved.[/QUOTE-peter findlay]

    Kupe alone is generating approx 2 cents a share per month . A reasonable dividend to reflect this should be made-e.g a 5 cent interim dividend to be made in march .This would go a long way towards reassuring investors that an investment in nzo will result in adequate returns .

    NZO already has sufficient cash reserves plus likely loans to be repaid from the sale of prc .

  5. #10995
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Wellington, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    435

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fish View Post
    NZO already has sufficient cash reserves plus likely loans to be repaid from the sale of prc .
    Remember theres the big $100m deal coming .....

    Maybe NOG is buying Greece?

  6. #10996
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,632

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fish View Post

    Kupe alone is generating approx 2 cents a share per month . A reasonable dividend to reflect this should be made-e.g a 5 cent interim dividend to be made in march .This would go a long way towards reassuring investors that an investment in nzo will result in adequate returns .

    NZO already has sufficient cash reserves plus likely loans to be repaid from the sale of prc .
    So who trusts NZOG's directors and management to put shareholders' interests first?

  7. #10997
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    477

    Default

    ""So who trusts NZOG's directors and management to put shareholders' interests first? ""


    ditto the current sp.

  8. #10998
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    40

    Default

    I thought NZOG's directors and management were shareholders !

  9. #10999
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,632

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LIO View Post
    I thought NZOG's directors and management were shareholders !
    "4 legs good, 2 legs even better".

  10. #11000
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Bolivia.
    Posts
    4,956

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Tommy View Post
    Remember theres the big $100m deal coming .....

    Maybe NOG is buying Greece?
    Don't be silly, Greece wouldn't cost that much!!

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •