sharetrader
  1. #11101
    Member brucey09's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    la paz, , Mexico.
    Posts
    234

    Default

    Snr. Surf
    Well said!!

  2. #11102
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Northland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    139

    Default

    All the other variables are out of their hands as every project and investment is out of NZO's personal control

  3. #11103
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Waimauku AUCKLAND, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    530

    Default

    It is truly amazing how long it takes for some s/h to wake up and realize what has been so obvious to some s/h and would be s/h, what a bunch of hopeless managers they are constantly lauding and backing.
    The NZ S/Market at least with this co. is wide awake whats wrong here and rightly give it a wide berth.
    Lets forget about NZO for the next 3-4 years, it will either fade away, be T/o, mercifully cash up, or dare I hope against hope, attract some competent talent to realize its potential and turn it around.

  4. #11104
    Public Affairs Manager NZOG
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    72

    Default

    dsurf, Happy New Year.
    I regularly pass on to the CEO and the Board various shareholder views on dividend policy. Those views cover the spectrum - at one end suggestions like yours for quarterly dividends, and at the other, shareholders who do not want us paying any dividends at all. Their view is that all earnings should be retained for re-investing in growth opportunities. This is standard practice in our sector. There are over 70 small to mid-cap E&P companies in Australia and NZ - only 3 regularly pay dividends, NZOG being one of those.
    With regard to quarterly dividends, the administration cost would be high. And at 5% of gross Kupe profit, a quarterly dividend would be less than half a cent. An annual dividend is much more efficient.
    In terms of market sentiment, institutions continue to increase their shareholding in NZOG. Our institutional holdings have never been higher. The sellers are predominently retail investors.
    I hope this is helpful - I repeat as always that any shareholder can email us directly through our website if they have a query.

  5. #11105
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    541

    Default

    Thanks for your response Chris.

  6. #11106
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Posts
    1,981

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Roberts View Post
    dsurf, Happy New Year.
    I regularly pass on to the CEO and the Board various shareholder views on dividend policy. Those views cover the spectrum - at one end suggestions like yours for quarterly dividends, and at the other, shareholders who do not want us paying any dividends at all. Their view is that all earnings should be retained for re-investing in growth opportunities. This is standard practice in our sector. There are over 70 small to mid-cap E&P companies in Australia and NZ - only 3 regularly pay dividends, NZOG being one of those.
    With regard to quarterly dividends, the administration cost would be high. And at 5% of gross Kupe profit, a quarterly dividend would be less than half a cent. An annual dividend is much more efficient.
    In terms of market sentiment, institutions continue to increase their shareholding in NZOG. Our institutional holdings have never been higher. The sellers are predominently retail investors.
    I hope this is helpful - I repeat as always that any shareholder can email us directly through our website if they have a query.
    I think anyone hopimg for a quartely dividend should seek out bank deposits that can be arranged to do such a thing.An annual dividend is enough for me. More is too expensive and has the look of desperation.
    digger

  7. #11107
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    470

    Default

    I can't see how changing the dividend policy will fix the share price. That's just slicing up the pie in a slightly different way. We need some growth.

  8. #11108
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    541

    Default

    It is about emphasising the cashflow generating that is going on. I think it would change the market's perception of NZO and provide some good news. It would say "NZO makes money every quarter!

  9. #11109
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    541

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by J R Ewing View Post
    I can't see how changing the dividend policy will fix the share price. That's just slicing up the pie in a slightly different way. We need some growth.
    Bad sentiment = company trading below NTA or "undervalued"

    Good sentiment = par value or better.

  10. #11110
    Corporate
    Guest

    Default

    I wonder if this is the deal NZO were also looking at?

    http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/2012012...gtljgdtm8w.pdf

    Maybe with their close relationship with AWE they might be the partners AWE is looking for.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •