sharetrader
Page 719 of 1792 FirstFirst ... 21961966970971571671771871972072172272372976981912191719 ... LastLast
Results 7,181 to 7,190 of 17913
  1. #7181
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    220

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by reggid View Post

    ... My guess is that if a TO is to happen[always no guarantees] it will be completed before end of march....
    It seems to me that there is a likelyhood of NZO attempting to do a takeover on the cheap. This may not be a smart move. A takeover offer needs to be outright convincing, a low ball opportunistic offer runs the risk of not being successful.

    Have a look at Cooper's recent takeover attempt of Incremental. They tried an opportunistic low ball offer and are now stuck with a quarter of Incremental, without control and without having access to Incremental's cash flow.

  2. #7182
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,898

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KentBrockman View Post
    It seems to me that there is a likelyhood of NZO attempting to do a takeover on the cheap. This may not be a smart move. A takeover offer needs to be outright convincing, a low ball opportunistic offer runs the risk of not being successful.

    Have a look at Cooper's recent takeover attempt of Incremental. They tried an opportunistic low ball offer and are now stuck with a quarter of Incremental, without control and without having access to Incremental's cash flow.
    My thoughts about this takeover reflect a very limited experience of nz takeovers-eg TTP and Shell/Fletcher energy -and I could easily be wrong in this situation.

    NZO might now has control of the actions of ppp through this 15 % stake and that held by its directors-?havnt some been buying big stakes recently . That might be sufficient for its purposes at the moment .

    If I compare it to the TTP takeover of minority shareholders all that needs to be done is for PPP to pay no dividends ,spend ppp cash on overseas assets-and the rest of the shares could come cheaply !
    Of course I could be completely wrong and they could do a shell-make a big offer that wont be refused !

  3. #7183
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Posts
    1,981

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fish View Post
    My thoughts about this takeover reflect a very limited experience of nz takeovers-eg TTP and Shell/Fletcher energy -and I could easily be wrong in this situation.

    NZO might now has control of the actions of ppp through this 15 % stake and that held by its directors-?havnt some been buying big stakes recently . That might be sufficient for its purposes at the moment .

    If I compare it to the TTP takeover of minority shareholders all that needs to be done is for PPP to pay no dividends ,spend ppp cash on overseas assets-and the rest of the shares could come cheaply !
    Of course I could be completely wrong and they could do a shell-make a big offer that wont be refused !
    The hole in this arguement is that PPP directors have a large stake in the company,so why would they engineer it to destroy market preceived value to get taken out cheaply.It would make since if directors had no stake in the company.Also NZO needs all of the company to have the assets of the company---the cash in the bank and the acreage in place and future assets.
    Digger

  4. #7184
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    405

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by reggid View Post
    The hole in this arguement is that PPP directors have a large stake in the company,so why would they engineer it to destroy market preceived value to get taken out cheaply.It would make since if directors had no stake in the company.Also NZO needs all of the company to have the assets of the company---the cash in the bank and the acreage in place and future assets.
    Digger
    Maybe the main aim for the moment is to get control between NZO and the friendly PPP directors
    above 50.1% - that's enough to control the company and prevent any other predators on getting their
    hands on PPPs cash on the cheap.

    I remember a NZO AGM years back where TR was asked why NZO was still holding PPP shares and
    he answered along the lines: NZO's interest in TUI was only 12.5% and together with PPP's 10% it made
    a more meaningful stake. He said the cross holding was important to block any cheap takeovers of PPP ..

  5. #7185
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,898

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by reggid View Post
    The hole in this arguement is that PPP directors have a large stake in the company,so why would they engineer it to destroy market preceived value to get taken out cheaply.It would make since if directors had no stake in the company.Also NZO needs all of the company to have the assets of the company---the cash in the bank and the acreage in place and future assets.
    Digger
    Hi Digger ,
    All I know is that companies can play all sorts of games when they have control of a company-SEA /TTP was in a similar position of majority control,lots cash in the bank-which they spent in Hong kong- and managed to get the minority shareholders out cheaply-well under NTA -the game took many years to play out .
    Once nzo have control of PPP they dont need to make a complete takeover-just wait long enough and more of the shares can be bought cheaply . In a few years time they take out the few remaining minorities-including the director shares at a much greater price-if i remember ttp took out a lot of the minorities at 44 cents or less and then the remaining shareholders were offered more a year or two later (a few of us got more through arbitration-which TTP appealed against and lost )

  6. #7186
    Guru
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    3,251

  7. #7187
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Christchurch , New Zealand.
    Posts
    421

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 777 View Post
    That WTI price shows a 23.7 % increase overnight!! This is huge, even in the current volatility.

    Here's another interesting figure . . .
    "World oil demand will average 86.6 million barrels in the first quarter of 2009, down 0.2% from a year earlier, before recovering to unchanged in the second quarter, the International Energy Agency said in a December 11 forecast."

    So this is demand destruction?? Down just 0.2% then unchanged!

    Well my opinion (and I'm sure it's no worse than many so-called experts and commentators) is there's a big rebound coming in the oil price, and quite soon.

    Happy New Year everyone.
    Last edited by Lion; 30-12-2008 at 12:38 PM.

  8. #7188
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,688

    Default

    Oil drops from US$145/barrel to under US$100/barrel.

    Along the way down, many keep on screaming -'It will reverse soon. Buying opportunity.'

    Any bounce, however small, is greeted with - 'Told you so! It's reversing!'

    Meanwhile, oil continued its drop - to under US$40/barrel.

    Be careful. Be very careful

    Heard the same thing back in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

    .

  9. #7189
    Senior Member Nitaa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    937

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Oil drops from US$145/barrel to under US$100/barrel.

    Along the way down, many keep on screaming -'It will reverse soon. Buying opportunity.'

    Any bounce, however small, is greeted with - 'Told you so! It's reversing!'

    Meanwhile, oil continued its drop - to under US$40/barrel.

    Be careful. Be very careful

    Heard the same thing back in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

    .
    Balance. Seems like a little scaremongering and perhaps you are looking for another entry into this fairly solid stock.

    Most of what you have said above have to a small degree already caught out the ones who thought prices have rebounded etc. In saying that without looking at raw data i beleive nzo has gained sometrhing like 10% this year. What makes this stock so attractive is the BALANCE (no pun intended) SHEET along with Kupe and future prodution and potention of tui permit. Pike has likely been overstated and most will know and expect next year coking coal prices to take a savage beating. All in all i think investors will need to be more careful of other investments or stocks rather than their holdings of nzo. Just my opinion of course.

    Happy New Year to all

  10. #7190
    Guru Crypto Crude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    New Zealand.
    Posts
    3,822

    Default

    boy, some of these oilers are absolutely amazing, even at $40US per barrel...
    Prime time picking...
    oil has discounted these stocks to amazing lows that wont be held...
    oil futures through the roof...
    NZO is as good as it gets...
    get positioned for oil in 2010 (now), and a full 2009 program for the likes of NZO...
    top 5 pick here...

    .^sc
    BITCOIN certified rat poop. NSA created, Expensive to send, slow, can only trade on cex, no autonomy, spaghetti code, has been hacked, accidental Backdoor brc20s whoops, no one building on it, alienated all cryptos against it, volume is fake, few whales control large supply... it will perform though

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •