sharetrader
Page 149 of 174 FirstFirst ... 4999139145146147148149150151152153159 ... LastLast
Results 1,481 to 1,490 of 1740
  1. #1481
    always learning ... BlackPeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    9,497

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ratkin View Post
    You are sounding a bit too desperate in trying to sound negative
    Just stating the obvious & not tempted to buy at today's prices. They had today anyway retirement villages on special ;

    Still curious - do you know how much above sea level the runway is?

    Councils need now to plan for 1 in 200 year floods and 1 in 500 year floods (which both could happen tomorrow), but it will still take a couple of years until all this stuff is getting published. Just curious how much water they show above the runway for the next "one in two hundred years event".
    ----
    "Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)

  2. #1482
    Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    4,744

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackPeter View Post
    ... and there is another crisis which might bite AIA. From memory their only runway is quite close to the sea. Does anybody know how much above sea level this runway is? Allow a bit more global warming and it might be unusable. If it survives the next 3 decades (which is in my view not a given), than at a PE of 30 investors might just get their capital back - without any interest.
    Yes Indeed, although The Covid recession could give them an extra year or two. Sydney and JFK runways are even closer to sea level if my internet search yielded correct elevations. I did not check any other coastal city runway elevations.

    Auckland 7m
    Sydney 6m
    JFK (New York) 4m
    Schiphol (amsterdam) -3m (gurgle, gurgle)

    Wellington 13m

    Sydney and JFK have multiple runways so not sure to which the google answers relate.
    Last edited by Bjauck; 08-04-2020 at 04:48 PM. Reason: Added a couple more

  3. #1483
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    chch, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    2,494

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackPeter View Post

    Councils need now to plan for 1 in 200 year floods and 1 in 500 year floods (which both could happen tomorrow), but it will still take a couple of years until all this stuff is getting published. Just curious how much water they show above the runway for the next "one in two hundred years event".
    By the time all these lock downs finish the sea level will probably be falling, not looking forward to the cold winters, it was warming up nicely before.

  4. #1484
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,881

    Default

    Sea level has been rising at a steady 3mm per year or thereabouts (depending on whose data and modelling you believe) quite consistently. At 7m AIA is in no danger in the next 300 years at least. That will cause a 900mm rise or about 90cm. Still 6.1m above sea level and should be plenty to weather the odd storm etc.

  5. #1485
    always learning ... BlackPeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    9,497

    Default

    OK - so if the runway is at 7 m, than lets take 2 m for a king tide and 1 m for the base (you neither want the base nor the electric cables along the runway under water), they have still 4 m headroom to cater for global warming and the odd tsunami.

    Not amazing, but yes, should be enough for any reasonable write off period.

    Lets see how long the Covid holidays are - and who knows, maybe I get in below $4 ... ;
    ----
    "Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)

  6. #1486
    Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    4,744

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackPeter View Post
    OK - so if the runway is at 7 m, than lets take 2 m for a king tide and 1 m for the base (you neither want the base nor the electric cables along the runway under water), they have still 4 m headroom to cater for global warming and the odd tsunami.

    Not amazing, but yes, should be enough for any reasonable write off period.

    Lets see how long the Covid holidays are - and who knows, maybe I get in below $4 ... ;
    To get another couple of decades, Maybe a Seawall and Windmills could create an AIA Island with causeways to High Ground Auckland.....

  7. #1487
    Senior Member moimoi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Posts
    547

    Default

    Is there an arbitrage here by selling some on market @ $5.48 to fund buying back in the SPP @ $4.66.?

    Notwithstanding the risk of scaling in the event the SPP is oversubscribed.

  8. #1488
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,881

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moimoi View Post
    Is there an arbitrage here by selling some on market @ $5.48 to fund buying back in the SPP @ $4.66.?

    Notwithstanding the risk of scaling in the event the SPP is oversubscribed.
    The fact that the SP now is $5.48 and the SPP is at $4.66 means that it is inevitable that there will be huge scaling.

  9. #1489
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    746

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackcap View Post
    The fact that the SP now is $5.48 and the SPP is at $4.66 means that it is inevitable that there will be huge scaling.
    Do you think the scaling will be according to your shareholding, the amount you apply for or a combination?
    Usually I have seen an allocation of shares based on your shareholding + the option to subscribe for extra but this just seems to be a free for all.

    "You may apply for Auckland International Airport Limited (Auckland Airport) ordinary shares (Shares), up to a maximum value of NZ$50,000, in accordance with the terms and conditions in the accompanying Offer Document (Terms and Conditions). Please complete the value of the Shares for which you are applying, and complete the direct debit instruction."

  10. #1490
    Veteran novice
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    7,289

    Default

    Assuming the issue is oversubscribed I would expect scaling to be based on shareholdings unless there is something contrary in the Term and Conditions of the Offer Document.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •