-
02-04-2020, 09:27 AM
#1431
Originally Posted by Balance
Second runway to be funded by a rights issue with Auckland Council contribution to the capital raise from the government?
Will it be required it any time in the near-term? I think we're more likely to see roads and rail prioritised, especially if re-election is a goal.
Last edited by Zaphod; 02-04-2020 at 09:31 AM.
-
02-04-2020, 10:22 AM
#1432
Originally Posted by Arthur
Is Auckland Council already at the top of it's debt limits?
Auckland Councils debt is just under $9b about 2.5x revenue.
-
02-04-2020, 12:23 PM
#1433
Member
My District Council was so keen to join LGFA (Local Government Funding Agency) they blissfully agreed to joint and several liability for other councils debt. I expect if Auckland's bonds go base over apex it will show up in my rates bill.
Has anyone pointed out to them how stupid such an agreement for others liability is? I guess we should be lucky you're in Hollywood.
Perhaps you can approach your local council for a personal guarantee on any loan you hold....
-
02-04-2020, 02:22 PM
#1434
Yes, very dangerous objects, guarantees. No guarantor ever expects to be called on to perform!
-
04-04-2020, 12:03 PM
#1435
Originally Posted by Zaphod
Will it be required it any time in the near-term? I think we're more likely to see roads and rail prioritised, especially if re-election is a goal.
Second runway would be a white elephant. It should be postponed perhaps for quite a few years. International travel will likely have a long way to go before we get to last year's levels.
Likewise roads. Hopefully many businesses and universities will keep up with the moves to working and studying from home, thereby reducing the need to increase roading capacity for peak times.
-
06-04-2020, 08:43 AM
#1436
Quick off mark .... $1.2 billion cap raise
Most going to insto’s as a placement ....mum and dads get a little bite of the cherry with a SPP but first impression a fair bit of dilution for them.
http://nzx-prod-s7fsd7f98s.s3-websit...293/320374.pdf
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
-
06-04-2020, 08:58 AM
#1437
Originally Posted by winner69
Yes, dilution of small shareholders, but that's seems to be the way that such things are done these days.
Disc: Holding - and expect to have a nibble at the SPP.
-
06-04-2020, 09:23 AM
#1438
Originally Posted by macduffy
Yes, dilution of small shareholders, but that's seems to be the way that such things are done these days.
Disc: Holding - and expect to have a nibble at the SPP.
I wonder where all this money is going to come from? Are the smart companies getting in early so that they can get the cash they need to remain solvent?
-
06-04-2020, 09:25 AM
#1439
Originally Posted by winner69
$4.50 floor price for the CR. That would be only 45% of the 12 month high of $9.90 - i.e. 55% down.
Just wondering whether this is setting a baseline for this bear market (for pristine key infrastructure companies, this is) - or is this still one of the cases of "first up, best dressed"?
----
"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)
-
06-04-2020, 09:29 AM
#1440
Originally Posted by BlackPeter
$4.50 floor price for the CR. That would be only 45% of the 12 month high of $9.90 - i.e. 55% down.
Just wondering whether this is setting a baseline for this bear market (for pristine key infrastructure companies, this is) - or is this still one of the cases of "first up, best dressed"?
Yeah interesting isn't it. I tend to think its a case of "first up, best dressed". Surely the money will run out at some stage or am I reading this all wrong. If I were a board looking at getting more liquidity on our books, I would rather go now than later.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks