Auckland International Airport Limited (AIA)

**BRICKS** · 23-04-2008, 01:59 PM

Originally Posted by Zaphod

Actually they're Swiss.

330 Madison Avenue
New York. NY 10017
United States..

That makes them Yank's, You call them what you like ??

and they still are 4th largest holder of AIA..

**Zaphod** · 23-04-2008, 02:55 PM

Originally Posted by BRICKS

330 Madison Avenue
New York. NY 10017
United States..

That makes them Yank's, You call them what you like ??

and they still are 4th largest holder of AIA..

So by your definition, ANZ-National are a New Zealand bank then?

Edit: Check out http://www.juliusbaer.com/global/en/Pages/default.aspx You'll understand...

**BRICKS** · 23-04-2008, 03:34 PM

Originally Posted by Zaphod

So by your definition, ANZ-National are a New Zealand bank then?

Edit: Check out http://www.juliusbaer.com/global/en/Pages/default.aspx You'll understand...

BROKERS that represent New York clients USA owners in the long run own AIA, Julius bear
went out of there way to point out they owned NO, AIA holdings..

AS for ANZ - National is a BANK only in NZ as part of ANZ AU.

**peat** · 23-04-2008, 04:01 PM

Surely Julius Baer are just wealth managers holding the shares as nominees so it doesnt matter whether they are Swiss or whether the office doing the transaction has a New York address or whatever. I thought I saw they had a few shares for various American pension funds - nurses from memory.
...so a pointless argument really.

but whats indisputable is that institutional interest is still there

**BRICKS** · 23-04-2008, 05:09 PM

Originally Posted by peat

Surely Julius Baer are just wealth managers holding the shares as nominees so it doesnt matter whether they are Swiss or whether the office doing the transaction has a New York address or whatever. I thought I saw they had a few shares for various American pension funds - nurses from memory.
...so a pointless argument really.

but whats indisputable is that institutional interest is still there

Julius is only holding the shares for clients as they stated for the various funds you mentioned but they have NO shares in them as WELL, BUT the story is that they now have a good slice of AIA 4th biggest but NO one is complaining you should ring up Helen and let her what's going ON...

**spook** · 28-04-2008, 10:02 AM

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/3/...ectid=10506424

I'm sure most of us on here would be in favour of any legal action.
The question is who wants to foot the bill?

CJ · 28-04-2008, 10:47 AM

Originally Posted by spook

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/3/...ectid=10506424

I'm sure most of us on here would be in favour of any legal action.
The question is who wants to foot the bill?

Just need some ambulence chaser willing to work on a contingency fee only. Would you join up if the Lawyer was charging a 30% contingency + costs?

**BRICKS** · 28-04-2008, 04:54 PM

Originally Posted by spook

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/3/...ectid=10506424

I'm sure most of us on here would be in favour of any legal action.
The question is who wants to foot the bill?

YOUR wasting your time thinking about as its only paper talk to fill in space what has happened has happened there will be NO way for CHANGE..

**Zaphod** · 29-04-2008, 01:51 PM

Airport law doesn't apply to Vector deal, Cullen says

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/1/...ectid=10506900

Perhaps this is because of the competing lines network in Wellington, that provides consumers choice over their supplier? Oh hang on....

**BRICKS** · 29-04-2008, 04:54 PM

Originally Posted by Zaphod

Airport law doesn't apply to Vector deal, Cullen says

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/1/...ectid=10506900

Perhaps this is because of the competing lines network in Wellington, that provides consumers choice over their supplier? Oh hang on....

BUT there are many net works and you can pick a supplier but only one lovely big piece of real estate called AIRPORT..