sharetrader
Page 183 of 733 FirstFirst ... 83133173179180181182183184185186187193233283683 ... LastLast
Results 1,821 to 1,830 of 7330
  1. #1821
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    473

    Default

    I believe you BB

  2. #1822
    Veteran novice
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    7,289

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kiwitrev View Post
    In a press release NZH Normans say do not intend to make a bid to takeover WHS.
    Not much point in a bid if they haven't lined up the Tindall stake first, I'd have thought. But whatever, it adds a bit of interest to the stock.

  3. #1823
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    473

    Default

    Two quick thoughts. 1) That's a lot of moolah to pick up WW stake-leveraged? and 2) What will F/Stuffs reaction be now that WW not holding a blocking stake. I would think they possibly looking to also exit and obviously only likely to be one realistic buyer.

  4. #1824
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,240

    Default

    All I can see is a huge mountain of leveraged debt and liabilities.
    The Normans do not own any premises.
    Pascoes,Farmers,Stevens,and Whitcoulls are all in leased stores.
    Most will be paying massive rents with long ongoing lease commitments.[and staff commitments]
    Buying into WHS just adds to this burden.

  5. #1825
    Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    3,025

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kiwitrev View Post
    Two quick thoughts. 1) That's a lot of moolah to pick up WW stake-leveraged? and 2) What will F/Stuffs reaction be now that WW not holding a blocking stake. I would think they possibly looking to also exit and obviously only likely to be one realistic buyer.
    he can only go up to 20% without triggering a takeover so would also need insto's help.

    Or maybe a combined Tindall/Norman/management takeover?

  6. #1826
    Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    3,025

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bull.... View Post
    if they wernt buying im sure the price would be lower, results are Friday be interesting to say the least
    they must have been a buyer, rather than woollies trying to offload or else it would have been sold at a discount. Definitely have something in mind.

  7. #1827
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    chch, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    2,494

    Default

    Interesting times, has to be good news for us lot

  8. #1828
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    473

    Default

    Or just to be a contrarian and arguing against my last post-Could JP already have an arrangement with F/Stuffs. Just loooking at all the angles. Can't see the Normans doing this larger buy-in with a long term view to just hold for divvies (albeit in a low interest environment) so on this basis there has to be MTC.

  9. #1829
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Masterton, , NZ.
    Posts
    2,250

    Default

    Percy - they are retailers, what does it matter if they own premises they own good businesses, I bet Trademe or Xero don't own theirs either.

  10. #1830
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    365

    Default

    My hunch is saying more "shop within a shop" model
    Warehouse jewellery offering is sub par. I imagine it is not giving a good return in $$$ for its space.
    Pascoes stores are leased in prime retail spots resulting in a high lease as a % of sales

    Pascoes moves into warehouse spots - gives warehouse a slice of the cake.
    The cake slice will be a better return than what warehouse is currently getting from it's jewellery offering , but lower cost than leasing a prime retail site.

    Thats my hunch anyway.....

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •