-
09-05-2016, 07:22 AM
#1451
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/n...ectid=11635718
The boom set to continue.
Let's hope the operators here do not kill the goose that lays the golden eggs with ever increasing prices - tourists from Asia are courted actively by other countries and as Hong Kong has experienced, they can go elsewhere is prices and services are unacceptable.
-
09-05-2016, 07:57 AM
#1452
Originally Posted by Balance
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/n...ectid=11635718
The boom set to continue.
Let's hope the operators here do not kill the goose that lays the golden eggs with ever increasing prices - tourists from Asia are courted actively by other countries and as Hong Kong has experienced, they can go elsewhere is prices and services are unacceptable.
Very true...and just about everywhere else is closer too. NZ's lower dollar (than 2012 - 15) does moderate that cost though.
-
09-05-2016, 08:00 AM
#1453
Originally Posted by Hectorplains
Very true...and just about everywhere else is closer too. NZ's lower dollar (than 2012 - 15) does moderate that cost though.
That is true but is also a problem with NZ tourism businesses over the decades - they treat a lower NZ$ as a windfall rather than pass the savings onto customers/tourists, and then howl like deprived spoilt brats when the exchange rates go up.
-
09-05-2016, 11:30 AM
#1454
I don't think exchange rates effect tourism volumes, personally. You don't go on holiday to somewhere because it's currently economically preferable. You go because you want to. For example you might go to NZ because you've always wanted to visit, or go to France for the romance, or go to China to see the wall, etc.
Once you get there, you worry about what you can afford. Typically people spend because the alternative is to do nothing on your holiday, which would be dumb after paying so much to get there in the first place.
That's why tourist traps can charge so much, and that's why it's called a tourist trap.
Agreed some people may go to a place because it's cheap there, but that isn't new Zealand's market and we wouldn't want to compete in that way.
JMO
-
09-05-2016, 01:04 PM
#1455
I'd agree somewhat but I often heard when Europe was in the crapper people saying it was a great time to go as it was cheap! And I knew a few people who did go for that reason, or prioritised a euro trip. Also heaps of people head to South East Asia because it's cheap.
-
10-05-2016, 02:36 PM
#1456
Looks like Sterling shares have found place, no more selling pressure blue skies ahead. Screen shot back to trading update on Friday 29th Apr.
-
10-05-2016, 02:47 PM
#1457
Originally Posted by sb9
Looks like Sterling shares have found place, no more selling pressure blue skies ahead. Screen shot back to trading update on Friday 29th Apr.
Institutions like Milford who have been accumulating for a while do not take the placement at $2.55 for a quick flick, one guesses.
-
10-05-2016, 02:48 PM
#1458
Originally Posted by sb9
They've balance, as per my quote from the other day.
-
10-05-2016, 03:37 PM
#1459
Originally Posted by black knat
Just been offered shares by my broker - so not a takeover.
You be a happy man black knat, won't you if you took the offer from your broker at 255.
-
10-05-2016, 03:50 PM
#1460
Originally Posted by sb9
You be a happy man black knat, won't you if you took the offer from your broker at 255.
yea pretty happy - only got 50% of what I asked for - heavy scaling.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks