sharetrader
Page 12 of 172 FirstFirst ... 289101112131415162262112 ... LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 1711
  1. #111
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    chch, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    2,494

  2. #112
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,299

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    As with a lot of valuation methods is rather subjective .... like how much is EBO going to make in the future ..... what WACC do you use .... for EBO on reflection I maybe should use a lower number than I have used because debt is such a greater proportion of capital used ..... how fast will they reduce debt etc etc
    I think you are saying Winner that debt has a cheaper cost of capital than equity. That means when you are doing your WACC calculation and a company increases its debt then that in turn reduces the overall WACC for calculation purposes.

    However, I have theory that the real cost of capital for EBOS is even lower than that. WACC is of necessity an historical calculation. Often in there are assumptions on long term funding costs. As long term debt rolls over and in the big picture long term interest rates plummet to all time lows, that means the WACC for bonds that you can look up will be overstated. In turn that means the earnings projections for EBOS in particular, given the context of this thread are worth more in present day terms than you think they are.

    Comments?

    SNOOPY
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

  3. #113
    Senior Member Halebop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    1,172

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snoopy View Post
    I think you are saying Winner that debt has a cheaper cost of capital than equity. That means when you are doing your WACC calculation and a company increases its debt then that in turn reduces the overall WACC for calculation purposes.

    However, I have theory that the real cost of capital for EBOS is even lower than that. WACC is of necessity an historical calculation. Often in there are assumptions on long term funding costs. As long term debt rolls over and in the big picture long term interest rates plummet to all time lows, that means the WACC for bonds that you can look up will be overstated. In turn that means the earnings projections for EBOS in particular, given the context of this thread are worth more in present day terms than you think they are.

    Comments?

    SNOOPY
    I think you are correct Snoopy. I'm not especially a fan of WACC and measures that rely on it. Historically sharemarkets react (albeit in a laggy and/or untidy knee jerk way) to bond yields. This suggests cost of capital must change, and probably more regularly than most models would allow for. But if markets were efficient (Again not a theory I'm a fan of) it would attempt to explain market volatility too. But oh brother volatility and various forms of arbitrage sit awkwardly with efficient market theory.

  4. #114
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,886

    Default

    One component of WACC is the equity premium which is rather subjective and dependent on a few inputs (as you guys point most of the inputs are historical).

    I tend to use an equity or market risk premium more aligned to my expectations (rather than the traditional calculation) .... I see this approach rather akin to Buffett saying he likes to earn 15% pa on his investments ..... and as such come up with a share price 'target' which would give one superior future returns .... not an 'intrinsic value' calculation per se

    Using this mark risk premium and the companies cost of debt is the cost of capital figure I generally use .... but of course reserve the analysts right to use whatever he wants
    Last edited by winner69; 27-02-2012 at 07:58 PM.

  5. #115

  6. #116
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,247

    Default

    Good article.Never thought about animal pharmaceuticals.Should have as my old cat was on half a heart pill a day for the last 18 months before he died,and that was $38 or more a month.

  7. #117
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,886

    Default

    Shareprice on fire .... up up and away

    Prob that article in the paper the other day saying the share market is a safe place now and seeing you can't get enough to live on with term deposits and things you may as well buy high yielding shares like EBO .... safe as was the implication

    No percy ... I don't have any bit you must be happy as eh

  8. #118
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,247

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Shareprice on fire .... up up and away

    Prob that article in the paper the other day saying the share market is a safe place now and seeing you can't get enough to live on with term deposits and things you may as well buy high yielding shares like EBO .... safe as was the implication

    No percy ... I don't have any bit you must be happy as eh
    Very happy.!!! Bit surprised . Wish you had some too.

  9. #119
    Adventurer Silverlight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    492

    Default

    Mark Stewart just sold his 5 million odd shares @ $7, he bought in between 2007 -08 at $4 to $5.

    Increase in liquidity if not to one owner is a positive, negative is that he is a director, and know way more about the business that we do, and that he doesn't like the risk reward profile of Ebos now with the new acquisition.
    ~ * ~ De Peones a Reinas ~ * ~

  10. #120
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,247

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Silverlight View Post
    Mark Stewart just sold his 5 million odd shares @ $7, he bought in between 2007 -08 at $4 to $5.

    Increase in liquidity if not to one owner is a positive, negative is that he is a director, and know way more about the business that we do, and that he doesn't like the risk reward profile of Ebos now with the new acquisition.
    Very sorry to see Mark stewart sell.He is a very astute investor,and has been a very capable director.
    Will be interesting to see where he invests next.
    I have held my EBO shares since well before Stewart brought in.I am happy with the Masterpet buy,so will continue to hold.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •