sharetrader
Page 29 of 61 FirstFirst ... 1925262728293031323339 ... LastLast
Results 281 to 290 of 610

Thread: Marlin

  1. #281
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,589

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smtrader View Post


    finally though to get back to your main point.. MLN has been paying on average 7cents per share per year over the past 10 years.. so 70 cents Plus as off this week around 80 cents per share.. thats 1.5 dollars per share total.. if you look at any hedge fund manager, the number one rule is guard your capital first by tweaking this "ALL WEATHER PORTFOLIO" and then go ahead with perhaps 20% of your portfolio on "GAMBLING" or taking bets - A.K.A to pick certain stocks, do trades, or use your magic ball to forecast the next crash like Martin Hawes

    just go into a global index fund in the DJI - you would have outperformed Marlin by leaps and bounds.

  2. #282
    -aholic
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    in the cloud
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    just go into a global index fund in the DJI - you would have outperformed Marlin by leaps and bounds.
    I don't disagree with you some funds are better than others.. principle is should diversify your exposure to funds as well, but its a complete mistake to negate them, and anyone who does will get bitten during a downturn.
    Last edited by smtrader; 22-05-2016 at 09:29 PM.

  3. #283
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    480

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smtrader View Post
    I don't disagree with you some funds are better than others.. principle is should diversify your exposure to funds as well, but its a complete mistake to negate them, and anyone who does will get bitten during a downturn.
    If you're after insurance in case equities crash, wouldn't you be better off with cash or bonds than a more expensive exposure to equities?

  4. #284
    -aholic
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    in the cloud
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mfd View Post
    If you're after insurance in case equities crash, wouldn't you be better off with cash or bonds than a more expensive exposure to equities?
    Bonds should be held all the time as a % of your holding.. so is cash precisely for a crash (assessed & adjusted from time to time depending on certain measures you take into account such as VIX etc. and your macro economic outlook) but you still need a % explicitly for funds (a combination of them to have a balanced exposure across continents, markets, industries, cycles & securities[including funds that primarily deal with bonds]) .. you need that for a balanced portfolio..

    The point i was making earlier was that a specific allocation for funds is necessary if you want a to safe guard your capital and have modest balanced return with less hands on approach. A combination of a few is best for risk management. MLN or other funds should be part of a balanced portfolio.

    I love making bets.. picking stock or using other instruments, i'll win some and loose some, but i'll be naive to think i know best. And it will be only part allocated for my betting portion.. i'd like to know the rest of my holdings is balanced out to give me solid steady income stream overtime, with the upside of gains and the peace of mind that i can go on vacation and shut down my computers and get off the grid whenever i want

  5. #285
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,240

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    ....and the discount to NTA is essentially the present value of future management and performance fees
    Ecactly.!!!!!!!!!!!!

  6. #286
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,240

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    You are a fund manager's dream investor!

    Give them $1.00 and they pay you back part of it every year as a 'dividend' while charging you management fees on what remains of the $1.00 - what a wonderful scheme!
    Right on the money,as per usual.!!
    A lot of us have made a lot of money following your advice,and most probably more importantly, you have also saved us losing a lot of money.
    Last edited by percy; 23-05-2016 at 07:53 AM.

  7. #287
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Bolivia.
    Posts
    4,934

    Default

    I held Kingfish for a reasonable while - mainly as a default holding for NZX and a place to park some money. Did quite well out of it between divvy reinvestment and market growth, however was always conscious that the divvy payout ratio wasn't sustainable, especially when look at the holdings. The divvies from these were not enough for the Kingfish payout - so coming from capital. Could argue whether capital vs capital growth is funding it - but essentially the same thing - as in the end it ain't from divvies received. A major downturn would see these majorly punished.....

  8. #288
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,589

    Default

    Good case in point of what this fund is about :

    Quarterly dividend of 1.72 cps.

    https://www.nzx.com/companies/MLN/announcements/282841

    But fund actually lost 6.2% in the quarter.

    https://www.nzx.com/companies/MLN/announcements/282215

    Dividend yield story? More like dividend yield fairy tale!

    Amazing how many fall for this trick/illusion of 'performance' so manager can keep clipping the management fees etc.

  9. #289
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,854

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Good case in point of what this fund is about :

    Quarterly dividend of 1.72 cps.

    https://www.nzx.com/companies/MLN/announcements/282841

    But fund actually lost 6.2% in the quarter.

    https://www.nzx.com/companies/MLN/announcements/282215

    Dividend yield story? More like dividend yield fairy tale!

    Amazing how many fall for this trick/illusion of 'performance' so manager can keep clipping the management fees etc.
    Wonder how many shareholders reinvest their divies - Marlin TSR return calculation assumes they do

    Balance - you understand this Adjusted NAV calculation
    Last edited by winner69; 23-05-2016 at 04:09 PM.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  10. #290
    Advanced Member BIRMANBOY's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    1,556

    Default

    Lol...following anyone's advice is just ludicrous and then you choose Balances advice ????....the poster who has yet to make any positive comment about any share anywhere at any time as far as I can see. I did look at one point but gave up after an hour.
    Quote Originally Posted by percy View Post
    Right on the money,as per usual.!!
    A lot of us have made a lot of money following your advice,and most probably more importantly, you have also saved us losing a lot of money.
    www.dividendyield.co.nz
    Conservative Investing and dividend producers...get rich slowly!
    https://www.facebook.com/dividendyieldnz

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •