sharetrader
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34
  1. #1
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,907

    Default Macquarie Fortress Notes

    Can I assume that these have not been the best of investments

    http://stocknessmonster.com/news-ite...=NZSE&N=160135

    NAV down to 49 cents ...... and I thought that investing in bonds and fixed interest thingies were safe.

    So the concept of 'this new world' with a host of new financial instruments and derivatives and the like that eliminate risk looks like it is all ending in tears

    Wonder what the next 'new world' will look like

  2. #2
    Legend peat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Whanganui, New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,437

    Default

    a general query not relating specifically to these Macquarie notes....

    Over the last few years I have noticed a number of 'capital protected' funds where they guarantee the original investment value and I assume risk only a small proportion of it to attain decent returns.

    How is this sort of thing panning out in the new risk environment. Have any actually lost their capital ?
    For clarity, nothing I say is advice....

  3. #3
    Veteran novice
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    7,289

    Default

    I don't know how they've been performing but the capital guarantee is generally obtained by placing enough of the investment on compounding term deposit to ensure that 100% of capital is returned after x years. And for that, the bank that provides the t/d also charges a fee!
    Not a great idea, imo !

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    480

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peat View Post
    a general query not relating specifically to these Macquarie notes....

    Over the last few years I have noticed a number of 'capital protected' funds where they guarantee the original investment value and I assume risk only a small proportion of it to attain decent returns.

    How is this sort of thing panning out in the new risk environment. Have any actually lost their capital ?
    I recall they were marketed in such a way, that you had all of the upside of investing in the sharemarket, but with no risk, as your capital was gauranteed in 5...10 years time. (whatever the life of the particular fund was)

    Yes, they would have looked attractive to a naive investor, but once you understood the mechanisim for obtaining the capital gaurantee (as explained by Macduffy) they didn't seem such a good deal.

    As to weather any have suffered losses, I don't know. Is there a secondary market where you can trade your capital protected funds prior to maturity ?

    Also, back when these were marketed, the portion of capital gaurantee funds they would have invested in, would have been in "triple A" type interest bearing investments, which in present circumstances could turn out to be worthless pieces of paper. In circumstances like that, it would come down to the credibility of the promoter of the fund to make up the difference I suppose.
    Last edited by kura; 07-02-2008 at 03:44 PM. Reason: Thought of something else to say

  5. #5
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,907

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kura View Post
    In circumstances like that, it would come down to the credibility of the promoter of the fund to make up the difference I suppose.
    Guy on the radio this morning saying that Macquaries should come out and say that no matter what happens they will give the punters their money back .... yeah right .... I can't see Macquaries as promoters of these Fortress things doing that no matter what the 'reputational risk' is

    Strange isn't it ...... Bridgecorp et al do some dodgy things (loans etc) and fixed interest investors lose out and they are labled as evil conniving rip off bastards by some investors .... but the likes of Macquaries do some dodgy things (investments) and fixed interest investors lose out and at worst Macs will be described as just unlucky and the victims of circumstances beyond their control and their integrity remains intact

    Yes you can buy these Fortress Notes on the NZDX - last sale 60 cents --- somebody offering to buy some at 20 cents in the $ -- seller wants 64

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    480

    Default

    W69, I'm not sure if these Notes were actually capital gauranteed (point me in the direction to look up Prospectus, and will have a detailed read)

    I think we just got a bit off topic, as I thought these Notes were purely an interest play (theoretically safe) and not invested in sharemarket, so punters wouldn't have needed a capital gaurantee carrot.

  7. #7
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,907

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kura View Post
    W69, I'm not sure if these Notes were actually capital gauranteed (point me in the direction to look up Prospectus, and will have a detailed read)

    I think we just got a bit off topic, as I thought these Notes were purely an interest play (theoretically safe) and not invested in sharemarket, so punters wouldn't have needed a capital gaurantee carrot.
    Doesn't look like they were capital guaranteed

    Prospectus here
    http://www.macquarie.com/nz/acrobat/...prospectus.pdf

    Latest investor update said if you managed to buy on market at 60 yield is in excess of 22% ---- but that is absed on interest at 4.5% (on the $1.00) above an assumed bank bill rate of 8.95%


    See what happens eh

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    480

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Yes you can buy these Fortress Notes on the NZDX - last sale 60 cents --- somebody offering to buy some at 20 cents in the $ -- seller wants 64

    Thats an interesting price difference, if NTA is 48 cents, then in the absence of a capital gaurantee, then you could expect it to trade round this level.

    If it is capital gauranteed, then you could value it at face value of $1, then just discount it for however many years to maturity. (at some discount rate)

    In any case, good luck to the guy offering 20 cents for something with a NTA of 48 cents.

  9. #9
    Veteran novice
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    7,289

    Default

    Given the nature of the assets I'd be very very wary of any valuation of the NTA!
    The bid at 20c may turn out to be somewhere near the mark.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    New Zealand.
    Posts
    1,221

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Doesn't look like they were capital guaranteed
    If they were capital guaranteed, that would be a sure-fire reason to stay away from them...look at all those apartments that came with rental guarantees!

    If you need the guarantee to make it work, then it most likely fails to stack up...
    Death will be reality, Life is just an illusion.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •