sharetrader
Page 7 of 24 FirstFirst ... 3456789101117 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 233
  1. #61
    IMO
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Floating Anchor Shoals
    Posts
    9,742

    Default

    I didn't say that they should be "special " those are your words. Falkensteins lack of disclosure as gaynor points out is putting himself AHEAD of shareholders . Snouts in the trough.

  2. #62
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    143

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joshuatree View Post
    I didn't say that they should be "special " those are your words. Falkensteins lack of disclosure as gaynor points out is putting himself AHEAD of shareholders . Snouts in the trough.
    You take the good with the bad, such is the way of public companies when you have one person as the majority holder, especially small cap stocks. It the risk you take when you invest into micro-caps.

  3. #63
    IMO
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Floating Anchor Shoals
    Posts
    9,742

    Default

    Risk you take with all size companies. Excessive free options, shares, int free loans, Imordinate salary increases, oversize golden parachutes eso when resigning after poor management i.e. rewarded for stuffing up., low thresholds for bonuses etc; withheld info; it still happens but not as bad as before with tightening up of regs. Great management who look after their shareholders are a minority; fact.
    Last edited by Joshuatree; 26-10-2014 at 11:58 AM.

  4. #64
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    143

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joshuatree View Post
    Risk you take with all size companies. Excessive free options, shares, int free loans, Imordinate salary increases, oversize golden parachutes eso when resigning after poor management i.e. rewarded for stuffing up., low thresholds for bonuses etc; withheld info; it still happens but not as bad as before with tightening up of regs. Great management who look after their shareholders are a minority; fact.
    Not so much so with larger cap firms as there is a greater spread of shareholders, retail/institutions, this generally keeps management on their toes.

  5. #65
    IMO
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Floating Anchor Shoals
    Posts
    9,742

    Default

    Good point chaowee88.

    Its well known that many water companies just use tap water with or without a filter. iIdon't have a prob with that.Most tap water (in NZ) thati drink i have total confidence in. But i think sterilising ,purifying it with a good malt whisky is great idea

  6. #66
    Ignorant. Just ignorant.
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Wrong Side of the Tracks
    Posts
    1,595

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    I have learnt from experience that turnarounds usually take longer than 2 years - more like 3 to 5 years, if at all.
    The last half of 2012 looked promising - as if the drought had broken.

    But then a steady trickle-down; when I was waiting for the dam to burst.

  7. #67
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chaowee88 View Post
    Hello, everyone my first post. This company lacks coverage but has cut costs, improved profitability, surprised to see the share price still languishing. P/E of 4.1 currently with the share price at 10C. New CEO now with Tony now director, Ian at the helm and fair bit of restructuring, sounds like a fresh new start with a fairly new balance sheet, debt down to 12.9 million. Next year could be defining with potentially a dividend comin for the first time in 5 years (Management stated equity ratio of 40 - 60 before restarting dividenda and they a close to that).
    I think you may have been partially instrumental in flushing out this take-over offer. Any way you slice and dice this thing, while you've made good money its been a miserable sad and lonely road for the vast majority of minority shareholders. I wonder how for example those who paid up for the rights issue in 2008 at 40 cents are feeling ? Hardly a generous offer from Falkenstein. I would have thought a minimum of 20 cents would have been appropriate and well supported by the improving fundamentals.

  8. #68
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,636

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roger View Post
    I think you may have been partially instrumental in flushing out this take-over offer. Any way you slice and dice this thing, while you've made good money its been a miserable sad and lonely road for the vast majority of minority shareholders. I wonder how for example those who paid up for the rights issue in 2008 at 40 cents are feeling ? Hardly a generous offer from Falkenstein. I would have thought a minimum of 20 cents would have been appropriate and well supported by the improving fundamentals.
    A measure of what kind of person Tony Falkenstein is and how JWI is run was glaringly illustrated when a director was appointed a few years ago and quit within 2 weeks.

    The guy is no good as a creator of wealth for minority shareholders - been like that since his days of Zee Watch.

  9. #69
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    143

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roger View Post
    I think you may have been partially instrumental in flushing out this take-over offer. Any way you slice and dice this thing, while you've made good money its been a miserable sad and lonely road for the vast majority of minority shareholders. I wonder how for example those who paid up for the rights issue in 2008 at 40 cents are feeling ? Hardly a generous offer from Falkenstein. I would have thought a minimum of 20 cents would have been appropriate and well supported by the improving fundamentals.
    Yep, before I brought, when I valued this I thought it worth around 18 - 20 per share, offer is slightly lower than what I hoped but I'm happy having made the right call on this one.

    Agree with you

  10. #70
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    143

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chaowee88 View Post
    Yep, before I brought, when I valued this I thought it worth around 18 - 20 per share, offer is slightly lower than what I hoped but I'm happy having made the right call on this one.

    Agree with you
    Not sure who but someone is buying up JWI at 15 today, how does he expect to make a return?

    Expect Tony to increase his offer?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •