-
08-05-2014, 05:18 PM
#1781
Member
Think a lot of people playing this stock at the moment easy money for now.
-
13-05-2014, 11:50 AM
#1782
Member
-
15-05-2014, 08:36 AM
#1783
Out now . Hope it is up to expectations.Lotsa good numbers.
Profit +17.9%
Rev +12.1%
fair value movement of prop +46%
total income +45%
NPBT +35%
NPATre $195Mill +42%
Earnings per share +43%
Div + 15%
Last edited by Joshuatree; 15-05-2014 at 08:41 AM.
-
15-05-2014, 09:09 AM
#1784
Yet another cracker result.Well done RYM.
-
15-05-2014, 09:32 AM
#1785
Reasonable but not outstanding result in my opinion and I agree that it will be interesting to see the market reaction after a huge ramp up in the SP over the last three years. Increase in build rate to 850 units a year but not till 2017....
Lower build rate in 2014 and lower new unit sales compared to pcp.
Much lower growth in cash flow this year compared to last.
Core EPS excluding revaluations of 27.3 c.p.s. puts them on a PE of 32.2 on a growth rate in EPS of 18%.
Last edited by Beagle; 15-05-2014 at 09:36 AM.
-
15-05-2014, 09:46 AM
#1786
Just been listening to the dial in . It is very good to hear the executives talk in such a positive manner. They have come a long way in the 15 years since the listing . One can only wonder at the possible growth over the next 15 years in Australia. Congratulations to the team @ Ryman. These are still firmly in the bottom drawer.
-
15-05-2014, 10:14 AM
#1787
-
15-05-2014, 10:25 AM
#1788
Originally Posted by NewGuy
if the SP continues to grow like it has, the PE will soon be off the chart and way into bubble territory (IMHO)
The PE is a ratio so will only climb if the SP growth outstrips earnings growth.
Earnings/Share (Basic and diluted) are up 43% from last year. Number of shares has not changed so Earnings are up 43%
By my calcs, this means the PE ratio drops by 30% assuming a constant share price.
As per my last few posts, SP growth should be measured from 2007 imho, not from 2010 when the SP was a bargain.
-
15-05-2014, 10:26 AM
#1789
My policy is not too pay for growth that isn't there. Using a fair value long term PE of 8.5 for a zero growth company and adding in consistent growth at 18% per annum my simple model gives me a long term fair value PE of 26.5 times for Ryman.
26.5 times core EPS of 27.3 c.p.s. = $7.23 fair value. I wouldn't buy or own the stock above this level.
EPS growth is not 43%, this includes revaluations.
Last edited by Beagle; 15-05-2014 at 10:27 AM.
-
15-05-2014, 10:28 AM
#1790
Member
probably bounce up as day gets to an end. Couta1 might have some easy money again.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks