sharetrader
Page 370 of 465 FirstFirst ... 270320360366367368369370371372373374380420 ... LastLast
Results 3,691 to 3,700 of 4647
  1. #3691
    always learning ... BlackPeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    9,497

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lewylewylewy View Post
    I found some interesting information today. I was taking to a tradie that works a lot on rym developments. He was telling me how poorly they make the plumbing, so it's cheap and only designed to last a short while, by the time it fails it's the punters responsibility to fix.
    I would take that statement with a grain of salt. In any retirement village (not just Rymans) it is the responsibility of the village provider to fix any building maintenance issues - no matter whether we talk about the independent living "villas" or the care units. Would not make any sense for them to get low quality plumbing - they would need to pay for all follow up cost (which could be substantial). No cost to the occupier (this is all covered by the DMF).

    Been last week through a Rymans village - and while I obviously didn't open the walls to check the plumbing ... what one can see looks clearly upmarket.
    ----
    "Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)

  2. #3692
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,890

    Default

    Baabaa has clarified with me why he got 56% average and I got 50% - baabaa has used a trend line number v my simple long term average.

    Yes, on baabaa’s basis the % is increasing over time (that is the sum as % of RYM)

    Extrapolating the trend line and assuming that the trend remains in place the %age will be 100% (ie sum share price equals RYM shareprice) around 2050

    As BP says value investing is a game for the patient - the very patient.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  3. #3693
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    8,516

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Baabaa has clarified with me why he got 56% average and I got 50% - baabaa has used a trend line number v my simple long term average.

    Yes, on baabaa’s basis the % is increasing over time (that is the sum as % of RYM)

    Extrapolating the trend line and assuming that the trend remains in place the %age will be 100% (ie sum share price equals RYM shareprice) around 2050

    As BP says value investing is a game for the patient - the very patient.
    Beagle might be in SUM retirement village by then presuming he isn't in the dog cemetery.

  4. #3694
    always learning ... BlackPeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    9,497

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Baabaa has clarified with me why he got 56% average and I got 50% - baabaa has used a trend line number v my simple long term average.

    Yes, on baabaa’s basis the % is increasing over time (that is the sum as % of RYM)

    Extrapolating the trend line and assuming that the trend remains in place the %age will be 100% (ie sum share price equals RYM shareprice) around 2050

    As BP says value investing is a game for the patient - the very patient.
    The problem with linear extrapolations is - they are intuitive and easy to do, but in the long term always wrong ;

    Nature is not linear ... and complex systems (like stock markets) still less so.
    ----
    "Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)

  5. #3695
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,890

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackPeter View Post
    The problem with linear extrapolations is - they are intuitive and easy to do, but in the long term always wrong ;

    Nature is not linear ... and complex systems (like stock markets) still less so.
    But Mother Nature does keep many things orderly .....like she keeps us attached to earth and makes sure the sun rises every day (even if you can’t always see it)
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  6. #3696
    always learning ... BlackPeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    9,497

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    But Mother Nature does keep many things orderly .....like she keeps us attached to earth and makes sure the sun rises every day (even if you can’t always see it)
    I guess it all depends on your point of view ;
    ----
    "Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)

  7. #3697
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,890

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackPeter View Post
    The problem with linear extrapolations is - they are intuitive and easy to do, but in the long term always wrong ;

    Nature is not linear ... and complex systems (like stock markets) still less so.
    Some say Nature’s Way is God’s Way

    Suppose we better not go down that path.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  8. #3698
    Alley Cat Brain's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Hoagy’s Alley
    Posts
    1,055

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Some say Nature’s Way is God’s Way

    Suppose we better not go down that path.
    Best not because then you will all have to put up with me talking about the flying Spaghetti monster

  9. #3699
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Baabaa has clarified with me why he got 56% average and I got 50% - baabaa has used a trend line number v my simple long term average.

    Yes, on baabaa’s basis the % is increasing over time (that is the sum as % of RYM)

    Extrapolating the trend line and assuming that the trend remains in place the %age will be 100% (ie sum share price equals RYM shareprice) around 2050

    As BP says value investing is a game for the patient - the very patient.
    Quote Originally Posted by couta1 View Post
    SUM closed at 48.69% so pretty close to half value aye but your proposed revised 56% theorum will have Beagle barking with joy and on that note it's good night from me.
    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    As Couta’s Chief Science Advisor time to clarify what the Couta Theorem is. Actually it has now evolved into a LAW — Couta’s Law of Relativity

    Couta’s Law of Relativity states that the SUM share price will always revert to 50% of the RYM share price

    The 50% being the long term average since the SUM IPO

    Note it doesn’t say it will be 50% all the time but during the ups and downs of the market the forces of nature will ensure it always will revert to 50%

    As it did when RYM was trading at what seemed ridiculous multiples in 2014 and 2017 - Nature said things have got out of kilter so the forces of Nature ensured the relativity reverted back to 50%

    And then SUM was hyped and ramped up to that ridiculously $8 level - Nature said things have got out kilter so the forces of Nature ensured the relativity reverted back to 50%

    It’s all about that time reversion to the mean

    Ignore the forces of Nature at your peril

    Updated chart ...on monthly closing prices
    SUM good Beagle bait there... but I am so sure this completely irrational quantum relative theorem debate has been done to absolute death that I am happy knowing I will be right eventually as share prices always follow earnings I will happily sleep my way to riches https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtBEmtj4FaM
    Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.
    Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine

  10. #3700
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    8,516

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beagle View Post
    SUM good Beagle bait there... but I am so sure this completely irrational quantum relative theorem debate has been done to absolute death that I am happy knowing I will be right eventually as share prices always follow earnings I will happily sleep my way to riches https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtBEmtj4FaM
    Haha but Xro's share price followed a lack of earnings up to dizzy levels, markets dont always follow rational thinking that's why it's best to be guided by Gold standard Theorums that have stood the test of time. PS - I'll leave you to SUM share whilst I myself are completely all out on a milky journey.
    Last edited by couta1; 29-05-2019 at 02:48 PM.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •