sharetrader
Page 43 of 468 FirstFirst ... 333940414243444546475393143 ... LastLast
Results 421 to 430 of 4672
  1. #421
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    , , Cayman Islands.
    Posts
    551

    Default

    Isn't it funny how all the brokerages that were dissing RYM during the housing decline have changed their tune..

    I have now seen DCF valuations and target prices for RYM from three brokerages ranging from $2.90 - $3.10, which ironically are now higher than my own current valuations. When as recently as 08/09 and even 2010, those same brokerages had doubts about the viability of RYMs business model in a declining housing market, and had valuations far below my estimates.

    Now we have comments like this coming from recent broker reports on RYM:
    Ryman well positioned to leverage its pricing

    With a potential scarcity of high quality product and large
    well capitalised operators, RYM with its 20+ year track
    record remains well positioned to enjoy very strong demand
    for its product and to leverage its pricing accordingly.
    And almost identical admissions from two other brokers that RYMs pricing is not entirely set by the residential housing market.

    I find this incredibly ironic that they now profess RYM to have some pricing power even in a declining market... But now this is no insight right? its simply hindsight now that RYM have proven it. It seems the role of the broker is simply one of commentary rather than insightful thinking about the micro and macro economics when it was truly useful (i.e. when the stock was trading at a hefty discount !!)..

    Of course there is some link between village pricing and the housing market (i.e. The old person buyers have to have enough equity in their homes to afford them to start with!) but the fact remains that RYM have considerable pricing power and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future, even if the residential market as a whole continues to decline.

    I agree with the latest broker reports, but its the timing that makes me wary. It wasn't difficult to see this 1, 2 or even three years ago.

    Don't trust broker reports and think independently is the lesson. That is a lesson that has been hammered home to me countless times now since 2007.
    Last edited by Sauce; 09-05-2011 at 09:00 PM.

  2. #422
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,283

    Default

    well all of us RYM followers on sharetrader certainly have your independant research/advice to be thankful for.thank you.
    Last edited by percy; 09-05-2011 at 09:04 PM.

  3. #423
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    RYM still good buying at $2.59 ? Thoughts anyone. Hold 25,000 considering adding.

  4. #424
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,283

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roger View Post
    RYM still good buying at $2.59 ? Thoughts anyone. Hold 25,000 considering adding.
    I think RYM has speed up their game,building more, so growth be higher.The moat has got deeper,much harder to enter the game for a new player.So RYM prospects with an ageing population looks excellent.Now to answer your question.I do not think you should let RYM make up more than a third of your total share portfolio.

  5. #425
    Guru
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    3,115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by percy View Post
    The moat has got deeper,much harder to enter the game for a new player.
    Why? Anyone with enough land and money can build one.

    Rymans advantage is in its systems I would have thought. It can build and run more efficently meaning it gets super returns for the same income compared to other competitors.

    This isn't a moat argument, more an economies of scale argument.

    Interested in your thoughts.
    Free delivery worldwide with Book Depository http://www.bookdepository.co.uk

  6. #426
    Member robo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    HB
    Posts
    56

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CJ View Post
    Why? Anyone with enough land and money can build one.

    Rymans advantage is in its systems I would have thought. It can build and run more efficently meaning it gets super returns for the same income compared to other competitors.

    This isn't a moat argument, more an economies of scale argument.

    Interested in your thoughts.

    Barriers to entry in this market is only access to capital, their dominant position and track record would take time to beat though
    Last edited by robo; 10-05-2011 at 02:25 PM.

  7. #427
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,283

    Default

    CJ and Robo.You are correct.I do feel you would need a mountain of money to even start.To ever get the reputation RYM have achieved would take years.
    Each year their reputation grows.People trust them.The moat grows deeper and wider each year.Their model is excellent.Operations excellent.Buildings excellent.
    They only need to put up a notice they are going to build a village on a piece of land to get firm commitments.What sauce is bringing to our notice is that brokers who thought the property market would affect RYM are wrong.RYM is a retirement village,home,care model.You enter a village and they look after you until you die.
    The stand alone private village will find increasing difficulties staying in business,while RYM will grow.We can see from latest announcements that RYM are speeding up their growth.
    The moat. the strength of the moat I feel is the amount of money and time it would take to beat RYM.or to equal them.
    Last edited by percy; 10-05-2011 at 03:08 PM.

  8. #428
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Waitakere New Zealand.
    Posts
    1,083

    Default

    Percy I think you are blinded by your own thought. not realistic research Where are all these (brainless) rich retirees that can afford their fees coming from. I am in this age group & would not dream of signing one of there contracts. I am not that stupid There are at least Seven Retirement Villages being spruiked on TV in Auckland Area at the moment
    Last edited by POSSUM THE CAT; 10-05-2011 at 03:11 PM. Reason: add to post
    Possum The Cat

  9. #429
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,283

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by POSSUM THE CAT View Post
    Percy I think you are blinded by your own thought. not realistic research Where are all these (brainless) rich retirees that can afford their fees coming from. I am in this age group & would not dream of signing one of there contracts. I am not that stupid There are at least Seven Retirement Villages being spruiked on TV in Auckland Area at the moment
    Possum The Cat. No surprises from your post.!!! Retirement villages everywhere.Only one really successful listed one though, and that is RYM.The others will spend heaps advertising,while RYM just need to put up a notice they are building a village here to get sales.I go past 4 fish and chip shops to get the fish and chips I like,and if they were listed I would buy shares in them.!!! RYM have also proved people will drive past other villages to get a RYM unit. Reputation. I have been waiting for your old prison argument..!!! lol
    What has blinded me is the share price performance of RYM.All done without calling on shareholders to fund growth.
    Last edited by percy; 10-05-2011 at 03:23 PM.

  10. #430
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    339

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by percy View Post
    The stand alone private village will find increasing difficulties staying in business,while RYM will grow.
    I don’t agree with this statement entirely.

    I agree that RYM plays this game better than the others, but that doesn’t mean any new entrants won’t survive. Their margins/profits may not be the same as RYM’s, but they could still hang around earning lower margins/profits whilst taking customers from Ryman.

    Ryman in no way have a monopolistic product, it just seems that way because they dominate the market.

    Someone could still enter this market and do well if they are sensible about it, but won’t do as well as RYM who have the systems, process etc etc in place to achieve the economies of scale.

    As CJ points out, that is RYM’s point of difference. Over all these years they have found what works, what doesn’t and been able to create the most efficient operating model possible.

    Ryman in many ways will be the incumbent when it starts building in Melbourne, a lot of their advantages they have in NZ won’t help them over there. Will be interesting to see how that works.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •