-
05-05-2019, 04:34 PM
#3641
Originally Posted by Patient Panda
10% underlying growth wouldn’t be a great look for Gordy especially after the phenomenal performance from Simon. Having met Gordy I thought he was very open and capable. Obviously they’re dealing with a larger capital base etc.. which adds a challenge but if it does come in at bottom end of guidance it’ll raise a few questions.
Yes Gordy needs to keep going with what Simon left him ...might be a big challenge though.
”When investors are euphoric, they are incapable of recognising euphoria itself “
-
05-05-2019, 06:11 PM
#3642
Originally Posted by winner69
Spooky eh ......l
Not really - just another variant of SUM other 50%ish rule but for OCA its a 9-10% rule (and not quite as much history)
-
05-05-2019, 06:12 PM
#3643
Originally Posted by Left field
That's quite remarkable.
Originally Posted by winner69
Yes Gordy needs to keep going with what Simon left him ...might be a big challenge though.
Simon...a true legend...I wouldn't want to try and fill his shoes...Gordy has it all ahead of him...on the other hand I think its fair to say Julian didn't have much trouble taking up where Norah left off
SUM / RYM pretty closely correlated too until just recently which kind of makes me wonder, (speaking of shoes), if the slow sales thing means RYM is the next shoe to drop ?
SUMRYM.jpg RYM in yellow.
Last edited by Beagle; 05-05-2019 at 06:19 PM.
Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.”
Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine
-
20-05-2019, 12:11 PM
#3644
Looking at the price action leading up to the result on the 24th I'd say the market is expecting a very average one, mind you SUM other companies have also been very average for a while now haven't they.
-
22-05-2019, 10:32 AM
#3645
Share price back to 12 bucks
That’s good
Gives sum hope that SUM might get up 6 bucks ....
.......or if RYM result not that good it’s share price will revert to $11.20 ...or even lower if SUM goes down as a result of a por RYM result
That’s not too good
Last edited by winner69; 22-05-2019 at 10:34 AM.
”When investors are euphoric, they are incapable of recognising euphoria itself “
-
24-05-2019, 08:43 AM
#3646
Very solid set of numbers
Jeez they should like Hallensteins with their ‘very challenging market conditions’ statement but heck they don’t seem to be having trouble selling units unlike sum others
http://nzx-prod-s7fsd7f98s.s3-websit...964/300403.pdf
”When investors are euphoric, they are incapable of recognising euphoria itself “
-
24-05-2019, 08:49 AM
#3647
Originally Posted by winner69
Yea but NPAT down winner, didn't you say this is the number that counts?
That number that counts down 16% or something...
But yes, I agree it is pretty good
-
24-05-2019, 08:53 AM
#3648
Originally Posted by trader_jackson
Yea but NPAT down winner, didn't you say this is the number that counts?
That number that counts down 16% or something...
But yes, I agree it is pretty good
NPAT being down happening to all sector participants as revaluation gains aren’t what they used to be.
That $326m a big number though t_j
Ps ..if I remember rightly OCA NPAT for H1 was down 97%. Wonder what Arvida result will look like?
Last edited by winner69; 24-05-2019 at 08:56 AM.
”When investors are euphoric, they are incapable of recognising euphoria itself “
-
24-05-2019, 08:57 AM
#3649
Originally Posted by winner69
NPAT being down happening to all sector participants as revaluation gains aren’t what they used to be.
That $326m a big number though t_j
Gearing creeping up, but margin is great... amazing how sum companies say they are struggling with margins, while others are excelling
That dog (you know the one) is reporting Tuesday next week... they must be doing worse than RYM so I'll be expecting a -20% or more drop in NPAT
-
24-05-2019, 08:58 AM
#3650
Originally Posted by winner69
NPAT being down happening to all sector participants as revaluation gains aren’t what they used to be.
They say it is due to changes in the revaluation assumptions made in 2018.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks