sharetrader
Page 130 of 213 FirstFirst ... 3080120126127128129130131132133134140180 ... LastLast
Results 1,291 to 1,300 of 2126
  1. #1291
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    886

    Default

    Antipodean that may be about right but it ignores the clear risk to the book.

    ANZ now has every incentive to get their customers to switch to their current insurance partners, Vero. So expect the $40m to decrease over time.

    Worth it, if it lets them turn off their old IT systems. Otherwise, maybe a forced purchase by Tower?

  2. #1292
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    356

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Filthy View Post
    maybe TradeMe insurance; isn't that underwritten as well? haha
    Trademe insurance is already underwritten by Tower

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaa View Post
    Antipodean that may be about right but it ignores the clear risk to the book.

    ANZ now has every incentive to get their customers to switch to their current insurance partners, Vero. So expect the $40m to decrease over time.
    Yes ANZ have full incentive to move that book now, assuming there isn't anything in the purchase agreement that either forbids it, restricts it, or changes the price depending on the book volume at March 12. In any case if these policies have been around since 2009, I can't imagine a flood of them will move in the next two and a half weeks.

  3. #1293
    Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Everywhere
    Posts
    7,001

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaa View Post
    Antipodean that may be about right but it ignores the clear risk to the book.

    ANZ now has every incentive to get their customers to switch to their current insurance partners, Vero. So expect the $40m to decrease over time.

    Worth it, if it lets them turn off their old IT systems. Otherwise, maybe a forced purchase by Tower?

    Buy ANZ instead you reckon ?

  4. #1294
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    307

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaa View Post
    Antipodean that may be about right but it ignores the clear risk to the book.

    ANZ now has every incentive to get their customers to switch to their current insurance partners, Vero. So expect the $40m to decrease over time.

    Worth it, if it lets them turn off their old IT systems. Otherwise, maybe a forced purchase by Tower?
    It would be standard commercial practice to write a non-compete clause into a deal like this. Those customers will be forever barred to ANZ

  5. #1295
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    886

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poet View Post
    It would be standard commercial practice to write a non-compete clause into a deal like this. Those customers will be forever barred to ANZ
    Your dreaming. The customer is always free to decide and your friendly local bank teller will always be incentivised to offer you a new better deal. Churn is as old as insurance.

  6. #1296
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    307

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaa View Post
    Your dreaming. The customer is always free to decide and your friendly local bank teller will always be incentivised to offer you a new better deal. Churn is as old as insurance.
    A bank teller? Jeez, haven't seen one of those for many years - do they still exist?
    The only way ANZ would be marketing to these customers would be on-line, and I'm thinking that will be prohibited in the deal

  7. #1297
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,267

    Default

    This does point to no dividends being paid within at least the next half year. However that money isn't 'lost', it will just appear in the capitalisation of the stock over time due to increased future profits. The board and management have recently purchased materially large positions in the stock. They believe using profits for acquisitions is the best use of funding rather than paying out dividends (which will be taxed) at this stage.

    I agree with them. They have finished heavy investment into their digital platform which will create large efficiencies. They are now in a position to scale the business with little extra admin cost. I still see the end game of Bain Capital being a sale of the business. The larger they can grow their loan books the more attractive they become to large overseas players who want a meaningful position in the NZ and the Pacific.

  8. #1298
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    South of the Bombays
    Posts
    289

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyTheHorse View Post
    This does point to no dividends being paid within at least the next half year.
    TWR did a capital raise in September 2019 in large part because the RBNZ wouldn't count the then disputed EQC receivable for capital adequacy purposes. With that position now resolved (albeit for an amount less than sought), TWR will have excess capital that it may have difficulty returning to shareholders tax effectively due to an absence of any imputation credits. I therefore favour investing the excess capital to grow the business.

    The ability of insurers to pay dividends continues to be under RBNZ surveillance due to COVID concerns on liquidity. Assuming TWR has a more than adequate capital position, small unimputed dividends hopefully won't be far off.

  9. #1299
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    82

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nztx View Post
    Boys & Girls - was that your dividend that just disappeared out the door ?

    TWR holders what remains of them appear to be a patient crew, perhaps too much so
    when it comes to swallowing a trail of excuses on why no Divvie .. not even a smell
    of one for long periods ..
    Apparently not..... https://www.nzx.com/announcements/367996

    "Tower’s consistent growth supports return to dividends"

  10. #1300
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Wellington, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    626

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ados_nz View Post
    Apparently not..... https://www.nzx.com/announcements/367996

    "Tower’s consistent growth supports return to dividends"
    And an intention that the half year dividend is 2.5c

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •