-
28-05-2020, 11:51 AM
#1121
Originally Posted by Cadalac123
Sure but their investment returns are currently an insignificant portion of their revenue so how would that lead them to going bust
Disc not a holder
thats why i mentioned there premiums you pay can only go up so much before people refuse to insure cause it costs to much , yet the cost of claims keeps rising.
thats why the investment returns are important
Last edited by bull....; 28-05-2020 at 11:53 AM.
one step ahead of the herd
-
28-05-2020, 03:39 PM
#1122
Originally Posted by bull....
thats why i mentioned there premiums you pay can only go up so much before people refuse to insure cause it costs to much , yet the cost of claims keeps rising.
thats why the investment returns are important
I’m not disputing your point but more your idea they’ll go bust which seems a little rash of a conclusion from what you’ve stated . Either way let’s see how bad this impacts them.
In relation to your point about risk of catastrophic events that’s an inherent risk with every insurance company during ant macroenvironmental climate
-
28-05-2020, 03:46 PM
#1123
Originally Posted by Cadalac123
I’m not disputing your point but more your idea they’ll go bust which seems a little rash of a conclusion from what you’ve stated . Either way let’s see how bad this impacts them.
In relation to your point about risk of catastrophic events that’s an inherent risk with every insurance company during ant macroenvironmental climate
i didnt mean tower will go bust just that insurers in general are more at risk now of it being a possibilty without the investment returns
one step ahead of the herd
-
29-05-2020, 08:41 AM
#1124
A messy, but solid result, with a solid outlook.
Far from the doom and gloom some others seem be trumpeting on here.
-
29-05-2020, 08:44 AM
#1125
Originally Posted by trader_jackson
A messy, but solid result, with a solid outlook.
Far from the doom and gloom some others seem be trumpeting on here.
Jeez t_j how can something be messy and solid?
No divie must be a disappointment to you though.
”When investors are euphoric, they are incapable of recognising euphoria itself “
-
29-05-2020, 09:11 AM
#1126
Originally Posted by winner69
Jeez t_j how can something be messy and solid?
No divie must be a disappointment to you though.
W69 haven't you ever heard of something being messily solid, or solidly messy??
More seriously, in the current world, no divvy can't be a surprise? Especially after just making redundancies this week.
-
29-05-2020, 09:36 AM
#1127
revenue up 11%, Profit up 24% Portfolio growth of 11.9% projected to continue. Maybe that's the problem, if it were a gloomy outlook (e.g. AIR) the SP would just take off.
No 1st half divvy is understandable with the redundancies, a "possibility" of a 2nd half one.
-
29-05-2020, 09:42 AM
#1128
Would not be a good look winner to pay a dividend they day they announce 108 job losses.
Might be more acceptable to do so in 6 months time (at full year), and they certainly appear to be in a position to do so.
-
29-05-2020, 09:42 AM
#1129
dividend in your dreams, they being saying ones coming for over a year now.
one step ahead of the herd
-
29-05-2020, 09:46 AM
#1130
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks