MET - Metlifecare - one for the fundies?

[Beagle]

sorry guys but I sold out of MET today at $2.40 [nice profit thank you].My worry is that all the residents in our village are going bananas,most of them breaking all the rules & next week they are going to let the kids in.I think the chances of a virus outbreak are now too high [& that would not do much for the share price].Hope all you guys with balls of steel do OK.I will not be back,good luck!!

Meow. I would have paid you $2.50 a share

[bull....]

Hahha.....fxxking classic this forum. Everyone just ramping up n ramping down to thier own benefits.

No virus in the community....being tested many weeks ...

Only virus from porn website....lol

PS: all newbies....be careful out here...trust no one...only follow the facts n fundamentals!

think you should be asking those big hedge funds about this , all over the register up and down playing it like a fiddle

[King1212]

Crighton....I saw the shares that u sold...200 shares at @$2.40....is that u?

[nztx]

Crighton....I saw the shares that u sold...200 shares at @$2.40....is that u?

Where you see that King1212 .. ? sure you weren't looking at ABA instead ?

NZX today - Low for day $4.35 High for day $4.40

https://www.nzx.com/instruments/MET

I must be looking in wrong place

Remember folks - we can't have MET looking too cheap if & while there is prospect of the Swedish outfit or someone else coming back for another look in ..

[Balance]

sorry guys but I sold out of MET today at $2.40 [nice profit thank you].My worry is that all the residents in our village are going bananas,most of them breaking all the rules & next week they are going to let the kids in.I think the chances of a virus outbreak are now too high [& that would not do much for the share price].Hope all you guys with balls of steel do OK.I will not be back,good luck!!

Good on the oldies - in their shoes, I would do the same. Why should the youngsters be the only one to be rule-breakers?

As Malcolm Forbes wrote years ago : “Don’t slow down as you get older. Go faster - you have less time to enjoy!”

[Poet]

meaning the parent will loan avpg the money to buy metlifecare , but still apvg has no assets just a shell company.

heres a kicker , the shorters came in after avpg was set up

The letter of Equity commitment would have contained a non revocable undertaking to finance the deal and its contingent obligations. MET and its lawyers wouldn't be trying to enforce the takeover on a company that could simply avoid its obligations by declaring itself insolvent and walking away.

[Balance]

The letter of Equity commitment would have contained a non revocable undertaking to finance the deal and its contingent obligations. MET and its lawyers wouldn't be trying to enforce the takeover on a company that could simply avoid its obligations by declaring itself insolvent and walking away.

I wouldn’t bother to reply to the clown. He is a self-acknowledged ramper. Anyone who takes his postings seriously is a fool imo.

[Beagle]

I wouldn’t bother to reply to the clown. He is a self-acknowledged ramper. Anyone who takes his postings seriously is a fool imo.

Bingo !!!!!

[Raz]

I wouldn’t bother to reply to the clown. He is a self-acknowledged ramper. Anyone who takes his postings seriously is a fool imo.

Actually it not always that clear with LOEs either and a few with knowledge here i'm sure are well aware of that. The most silly part of this comment is if there any underlying motive rather than a honest view it would be far from ramping...

[Baa_Baa]

You know, from an ignorant onlooker, which in current company of the most esteemed amongst us I feel I am, the compelling feeling I get is that MET is a binary decision. For an investor it is the worst performing company in the sector and likely to remain so for some time. For the trader, opportunist or punter, it presents a near term opportunity notwithstanding inherent risks.

When the most informed and astute amongst us cannot arrive at a common landing point, the ignorant should step aside. For my own purposes I think there are better places to focus my attention, but not because I am certain they are better investments, Moreso that I am less unsure of a binary outcome than what appears to be unfolding for MET.