-
17-08-2016, 03:09 PM
#411
Copied over from my SUM post (does not include dividends)
Last 2 years they returned as follows:
RYM +23.11%
MET +37.15%
SUM +86.83%
5 year comparison
MET +193.50%
RYM +264.09%
SUM +281.88%
-
17-08-2016, 04:10 PM
#412
Originally Posted by silu
Copied over from my SUM post (does not include dividends)
Last 2 years they returned as follows:
RYM +23.11%
MET +37.15%
SUM +86.83%
5 year comparison
MET +193.50%
RYM +264.09%
SUM +281.88%
And once you add in the dividends, you'll find that Ryman comes out on top over 5 years plus if you used today's prices to get those percentages, Sum is in exuberant mode while Ryman is in a dip.
-
17-08-2016, 04:20 PM
#413
Originally Posted by couta1
And once you add in the dividends, you'll find that Ryman comes out on top over 5 years plus if you used today's prices to get those percentages, Sum is in exuberant mode while Ryman is in a dip.
I like and hold all three. But I timed my entry (after my re-entry into stocks in 2013) based on my own valuations which meant I got first into MET then into SUM and RYM finally was cheap enough to buy for me early this year.
-
17-08-2016, 04:26 PM
#414
Rym half yr end of sept. thats probably why the lag.
-
17-08-2016, 04:26 PM
#415
Originally Posted by silu
I like and hold all three. But I timed my entry (after my re-entry into stocks in 2013) based on my own valuations which meant I got first into MET then into SUM and RYM finally was cheap enough to buy for me early this year.
Good on you, I've played around too much and missed a lot of gains but I blame that on itchy finger disorder. I think what your figures show is there's nothing much in it between Sum and Ryman over the last five years and I believe the next five will be the same,contrary to what many Sum holders are projecting.
-
17-08-2016, 04:36 PM
#416
Originally Posted by kizame
Rym half yr end of sept. thats probably why the lag.
No, end of November not Sept.
-
17-08-2016, 05:55 PM
#417
Originally Posted by couta1
No, end of November not Sept.
Sorry meant half yr balance date not reporting time.
-
17-08-2016, 05:57 PM
#418
Originally Posted by couta1
Good on you, I've played around too much and missed a lot of gains but I blame that on itchy finger disorder. I think what your figures show is there's nothing much in it between Sum and Ryman over the last five years and I believe the next five will be the same,contrary to what many Sum holders are projecting.
Do you think that it would be realistic to expect the kind of growth rate these property+extra stocks have experienced over the past five years to continue for another five years?
Disc:Hold all three. SUM largest holding now.
-
17-08-2016, 06:09 PM
#419
Originally Posted by Bjauck
Do you think that it would be realistic to expect the kind of growth rate these property+extra stocks have experienced over the past five years to continue for another five years?
Disc:Hold all three. SUM largest holding now.
Massive tailwinds with the gap between demand and supply increasing, it's possible and if not, growth will still be impressive.
-
24-08-2016, 08:57 AM
#420
Amazing numbers
If MET was valued in line with RYM it's share price wold be $16/$18
Hmm - might need to lighten up on SUM and split it with MET (leave RYM out though)
What ever its all well in the sector - even though booming property prices are helping. Just look at those revaluation numbers
Last edited by winner69; 24-08-2016 at 09:01 AM.
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks