-
25-03-2010, 08:29 AM
#281
-
26-03-2010, 08:25 AM
#282
-
27-03-2010, 05:36 AM
#283
-
30-03-2010, 07:41 AM
#284
...today, as far as markets are concerned, I am content to take the short risk... amidst bullish sentiment based on a lot of bull**** and grizzly bears turned into gummi bears, and I do agree with David Rosenberg at times like today:
Divid Rosenberg: Looking at the fund flows, there is only one conclusion that can be reached: This market is being driven by pig farmers (program trades. ed.). Retail inflows may have picked up of late, but only fractionally. The focus on the part of the individual investor remains on the fixed-income market, for better or for worse (better from our standpoint, worse from the standpoint of my friend and fellow debater Jim Grant).
Institutional portfolio manager cash ratios are back to the rock bottom levels of around 3½% — where they were back at the market peak in October 2007. The shorts have all but been covered. Foreign investors have been few and far between, based on the latest TICS data. The lack of volume speaks volumes — there are no sellers. Investors of all types have been content to just sit and watch their equity position expand via the price appreciation, but there is scant evidence of any follow-through this year in terms of volume buying.
So, that leaves me with a suspicion that the entities doing the buying are the pig farmers. Who are they pray tell? They are the prop desks at the five large banks. They buy and sell securities, with leverage ... to each other! And, these transactions often occur late in the day or in the futures pit after the market closes. There is no sign of any other buyer out there, including the Fed who has been too busy choking on mortgage backed securities and Maiden Lane assets. To repeat, that is why the volumes have been so low.
What we should be aware of about the pig farmers is that they could, at any time, flick the switch in the other direction. What the “trapped longs” may be forced to do — the ones that have been sitting on their hands and have been waiting for the bear market rally to take their portfolio back to where it was at the peaks — at that point is start to sell. That is when the volume picks up ... and accelerates the downside pressure.
Kind Regards
Last edited by ananda77; 30-03-2010 at 07:43 AM.
-
30-03-2010, 10:10 AM
#285
David Rosenburg is a super permabear. I can understand his frustration at the moment..we are a cyclic bull market and he is upset. The same happened in 2006 with him when economic theory did not match stockmarket behaviour...I thought he may have learn't something from that as he is a super intelligent guy and Chief economist and strategist but I guess a leopard (bear) can't change his spots...
Oh well... like they say ...Every dog (bear) has their day. Maybe it will be tomorrow
Last edited by Hoop; 30-03-2010 at 10:11 AM.
-
30-03-2010, 10:59 AM
#286
Market Strength Indicator.
Originally Posted by Hoop
.Every dog (bear) has their day. Maybe it will be tomorrow....
Permabears are bound to get it right, sooner or later - a bit like the stopped clock that shows the right time twice a day!
There are, of course, times when we all really should "beware the Bear". For me, it's when the plot is red. That way, I get to enjoy the good times!
-
30-03-2010, 03:01 PM
#287
Thanks for the update- Good to see the MSI sitting solidly on 1!
-
30-03-2010, 05:17 PM
#288
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Treasu...&asset=&ccode=
C overhang ... I'm a little supprised that treasury doesn't hold for a bit longer -YEAH RIGHT...so to speak
...basically the question Rosenberg raises here is 'what factors will determine program trade to change course' and he thinks that
-10-year treasury yields above 4% takes the usual institutional buyers out of the equation
-institutional cash just above 3 % another reason institutions are unlikely buyers
-at some stage the program trade needs to off-load their accumulated expensive junk as volume margin discounts are a bit boring in the longer term
-furthermore 20 billion dollars of net speculative S&P large contracts showed up on last week's COT report (probably nothing to it and something to do with government selling 'C')??
...therefore on one hand the program trade needs sellers >>unlikely if they keep propping the market very low volume figures); on the other hand they need buyers and lots of them; so unless they somehow manage to convince JOE to enter the market -unlikley as JOE has stayed out all the up to here and most likely does not want to jump now- everyone should be happy if a nice correction takes us all into richer waters
...so basically, JOE is needed to finish the cyclical bull in classic 3-wave style -insiders -institutions -public but unless we have a decent enough correction down etc, etc, etc
Kind Regards
Last edited by ananda77; 30-03-2010 at 07:04 PM.
-
30-03-2010, 10:37 PM
#289
Member
Hi Phaedrus,
Just a quick thought on your MSI. Have you done any research on the time that indicator stays at 100%? Looking at it, it looks like there is a reasonable pattern but it may just be an illusion. If you knew the indicator had a run of 100% for 72 days for instance and this was the longest it had run for, well any fractal points of that detail might make for points of interest in the future.
Cheers,
Shane.
-
31-03-2010, 07:18 AM
#290
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks