-
10-05-2013, 05:44 PM
#131
Originally Posted by stoploss
Thank you for posting that.
Not sure whether we are "well positioned" or "poised".
Second thoughts,we are "poised."
-
10-05-2013, 05:52 PM
#132
Originally Posted by percy
Thank you for posting that.
Not sure whether we are "well positioned" or "poised".
Second thoughts,we are "poised."
Percy, maybe well positioned , and poised when it lists on some sort of exchange......
-
10-05-2013, 06:14 PM
#133
Originally Posted by stoploss
Percy, maybe well positioned , and poised when it lists on some sort of exchange......
Yes, I think you are right.
Just got a bit over excited.!!!!!!
-
10-05-2013, 06:16 PM
#134
Originally Posted by percy
Yes, I think you are right.
Just got a bit over excited.!!!!!!
"over excited " that will be Wednesday ......
-
10-05-2013, 06:34 PM
#135
Interesting days ahead...
-
10-05-2013, 06:42 PM
#136
Originally Posted by stoploss
"over excited " that will be Wednesday ......
The penny did not drop until I checked my diary.
AWF day offcourse.!!!!
-
11-05-2013, 10:27 AM
#137
Member
-
11-05-2013, 11:17 AM
#138
Originally Posted by SCOTTY
Hi stoploss
Thanks very much for posting this link.
This proposed listing is a very very exciting time for the Company, Shareholders and future investors.
I do hope that the listing is on the NZXA (NZX Alternative Market) rather than on the Unlisted Exchange.
The Unlisted Exchange would certainly be better than not being listed but the NZXA is certainly more accessable and an easier trading platform than the Unlisted Exchange. I think that the NZXA would give much better access and coverage for investors and EstarOnline. Any thoughts?
SCOTTY is a very happy shareholder.
Cheers
Hi Scotty, agree that any listing would be better than none. I think as shareholders we have to think of what is the best option for the company . This has to include the cost of the listing and ongoing compliance which can be onerous on a relatively small company... But as this points out there are benefits in cost of capital etc...... suppose we have to leave it to the Board of directors and hope the company can keep on the bandwagon that is online sales....
-
11-05-2013, 11:47 AM
#139
Originally Posted by stoploss
Hi Scotty, agree that any listing would be better than none. I think as shareholders we have to think of what is the best option for the company . This has to include the cost of the listing and ongoing compliance which can be onerous on a relatively small company... But as this points out there are benefits in cost of capital etc...... suppose we have to leave it to the Board of directors and hope the company can keep on the bandwagon that is online sales....
Yes, the directors have an excellent record of doing the right thing for shareholders,and any listing would be better than none.
I have PAZ and REL shares on Unlisted.Did own some Rang A sometime ago.I find very few people follow the Unlisted market.
For the extra [if any] I would much prefer to see them on the NZAX, where they will get coverage when people look at tech stocks.
They would be over looked on Unlisted.
-
11-05-2013, 01:32 PM
#140
Ian way, it is a shame they don't need new capital. Imagine if they listed on the NZAX with Sam Morgan putting in $1m (like SLI) or Gaynor backing it. Would give it instant appeal.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks