sharetrader
Page 12 of 26 FirstFirst ... 2891011121314151622 ... LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 258
  1. #111
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    New Zealand.
    Posts
    4,448

    Thumbs down

    These directors SHOULD BE MADE TO SELL THEIR MANAGEMENT CONTRACT FOR SHARES in this offering that would leave them with skin in the game instead of a falling S/P

  2. #112
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    anzac
    Posts
    1,127

    Arrow Its easy..

    JUST don't BUY the share let them fend for themselves but it appears NZ investors cant
    help THEMSELVES..

  3. #113
    Veteran novice
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    7,289

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BRICKS View Post
    JUST don't BUY the share let them fend for themselves but it appears NZ investors cant
    help THEMSELVES..
    BRICKS and I don't always see eye to eye but I'm 100% with him on this one!



    Why anyone would want to put money into this float (?) beats me.

  4. #114
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    8

    Default

    I can quite understand the horror and anger this is causing past and existing investors in DNZ.You are being badly treated.

    But as a new investor in these assets I see a reasonable prospect.Acceptable yield at a good discount to NTA (30/09/09 valuations) with the "old problems" of the hideous management contract,excessive gearing and illiquid trading being cleaned out.

    I note messers Duffy and Hasell are "invested" out of their proceeds to the tune of 26.2 million shares (embargoed for 18 months).And yes,there are some outs but not without consequences.

    I don't think the other directors including Simon Botherway would be taking up $3 million worth of shares without some sense of future value in it.

    Are comments this is "crap" or not worth it fairly appraising the new form entity or just reflecting past pain?

  5. #115
    Legend
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sth Island. New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,435

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by i_claudius View Post
    I can quite understand the horror and anger this is causing past and existing investors in DNZ.You are being badly treated.

    But as a new investor in these assets I see a reasonable prospect.Acceptable yield at a good discount to NTA (30/09/09 valuations) with the "old problems" of the hideous management contract,excessive gearing and illiquid trading being cleaned out.

    I note messers Duffy and Hasell are "invested" out of their proceeds to the tune of 26.2 million shares (embargoed for 18 months).And yes,there are some outs but not without consequences.

    I don't think the other directors including Simon Botherway would be taking up $3 million worth of shares without some sense of future value in it.

    Are comments this is "crap" or not worth it fairly appraising the new form entity or just reflecting past pain?

    Work it out yourself. At 82 cents they return 8.6%. That's low in comparison to other lpts, so shares should be around 79 cents. . Based on discount to NTA they shoUld be $1 + based on other lpts. So who knows? I can't see the appeal, but it's a strange world at times. KIP,ING, KIP and GMT all look better to me.

  6. #116
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Thanks Fungus.

    The yield's not too bad...only slightly off some of the other lpts.

    Seems to me you're saying it yourself.The appeal is in the discount to NTA and that is where the value might emerge with the internalised management and an improving property market.

    LPTs aren't quick trades or stags but an option on property inflation.Provided they self fund,theres always a place for that in my portfolio.Better yields can be achived in the debt market.

    Just my humble opinion.

  7. #117
    ShareTrader Legend bull....'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    11,069

    Default

    Snapper I think I summed it up its not a good investment in my opinion. high risk doesnt matter if the portfolio bad or good it s a macro thing old chap.


    Heres my prediction of the future - revalued property values down
    - lower divs
    - cash issue to support the balance sheet . diluting poor old s/h ( hence why you will lose halve your dough ) if you dont put more money in.

    This senario could or may have already happened to many a property company. guess time will tell , dont mind being wrong.

    And yea I think some other companies have a better portfolio for these times.
    Last edited by bull....; 30-11-2009 at 10:09 PM. Reason: forgot some
    one step ahead of the herd

  8. #118
    Member Snapper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Mt Maunganui New Zealand.
    Posts
    282

    Default

    Thanks for your opinions Bull, I Claudius, Bricks & co. All different but I guess that's what makes a market. As to the post below...


    Quote Originally Posted by troyvdh View Post
    ...dear snapper..with all due respect...you are an example of what is wrong with our share market....this IPO ..is crap......everone knows this....there is little if not no chance that this will be a successful.....on the face of it 30 % of all monies forwarded are to for a management contract...in the past....bye the way...how many dollars have you in the "mkt"....
    Dear Troy
    I am truly humbled by your due respect, totally undeserved I assure you. Humbly I ask you what attributes I should have to improve the market, bad grammar maybe?

    How many dollars do I have in the ""mkt""? What is this, a pi$$ing contest?

  9. #119
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    ChCh, , .
    Posts
    1,367

    Default

    dear Snapper..fair call (I never got SC English....even worse in maths)....no this not a pi$$ing contest....however over the years I cannot recall how many times i have spoken to folk about making/keeping dosh..and how often some folk aint got any !.
    Ive owned rentals for some 30 yrs..longest tenant...11 yrs...he was a realestate agent ?..who worked in the recruitment dept !!!!.As for some brokers..what a joke..almost in every case they almost never had any "skin in the game".
    So apologies for being a blunt prick...I could have phrased my point differently....if you get my point.

  10. #120
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    18

    Default Interesting development

    There maybe some hope for existing investors!


    http://www.sharechat.co.nz/article/4...dnz-float.html

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •