-
11-01-2014, 10:00 AM
#6231
There was a glimmer of hope for a while there that the terminally ill US economy was going to do OK because someone gave the patient a pain killers and he looked ok on the outside,(while he continued to smoke ,drink ,and party hardy with someone else's money)
But now that the painkillers are being cut down ,withdrawal symptoms are starting to show.
Some day they will figure out that it is more important to keep your countries population in work,even at the expense of the fat cats making a few less billions.
But it will take a
''Man of the people" coming along who is not afraid to commit political suicide rather than the usual Corporate slaves.
Meanwhile gold just does what it does, reacts to the state of the beast (which is the real show)
-
11-01-2014, 10:09 AM
#6232
I wouldn't read too much into the non-farm payrolls number & even the next one might also be bad. Remember there is a massive freeze going on in North America & that would certainly have an impact. Obviously if its the start of a trend, then that's something different. That participation rate though is just damned right ugly & I do think this is the number that people should be concentrating on.
Hopefully you find my posts helpful, but in no way should they be construed as advice. Make your own decision.
-
11-01-2014, 11:13 AM
#6233
There was a glimmer of hope for a while there that the terminally ill US economy was going to do OK because someone gave the patient a pain killers and he looked ok on the outside,(while he continued to smoke ,drink ,and party hardy with someone else's money)
But now that the painkillers are being cut down ,withdrawal symptoms are starting to show.
Some day they will figure out that it is more important to keep your countries population in work,even at the expense of the fat cats making a few less billions.
But it will take a
''Man of the people" coming along who is not afraid to commit political suicide rather than the usual Corporate slaves.
Meanwhile gold just does what it does, reacts to the state of the beast (which is the real show)
-
11-01-2014, 12:07 PM
#6234
Originally Posted by Daytr
I wouldn't read too much into the non-farm payrolls number & even the next one might also be bad. Remember there is a massive freeze going on in North America & that would certainly have an impact.
The figure was for December though and afaik the cold spell starred in January so I'm not thinking this is a factor.
Always going to be volatility in the monthly figures of course
For clarity, nothing I say is advice....
-
11-01-2014, 12:17 PM
#6235
Yeah I was wondering about that as well. Numerous reports stated the cold as a factor, so I think the well publicized record polar vortex hit in January, but I still think it was pretty freezing in Dec as well.
Originally Posted by peat
The figure was for December though and afaik the cold spell starred in January so I'm not thinking this is a factor.
Always going to be volatility in the monthly figures of course
Hopefully you find my posts helpful, but in no way should they be construed as advice. Make your own decision.
-
11-01-2014, 05:00 PM
#6236
Originally Posted by moosie_900
Need to look at past years and see if seasonality is trend for summer months.
figures are seasonally adjusted
there is no question it was a poor result and the weather or the season is NOT a factor.
Indeed there is a specific piece of info describing the impact weather has on the figures http://www.bls.gov/ces/cesfaq.htm#revisions21
How can unusually severe weather affect employment and hours estimates?
In the establishment survey, the reference period is the pay period that includes the 12th of the month. Unusually severe weather is more likely to have an impact on average weekly hours than on employment. Average weekly hours are estimated for paid time during the pay period, including pay for holidays, sick leave, or other time off. The impact of severe weather on hours estimates typically, but not always, results in a reduction in average weekly hours. For example, some employees may be off work for part of the pay period and not receive pay for the time missed, while some workers, such as those dealing with cleanup or repair, may work extra hours.
In order for severe weather conditions to reduce the estimate of payroll employment, employees have to be off work without pay for the entire pay period. About half of all employees in the payroll survey have a 2-week, semi-monthly, or monthly pay period. Employees who receive pay for any part of the pay period, even 1 hour, are counted in the payroll employment figures. It is not possible to quantify the effect of extreme weather on estimates of employment from the establishment survey.
However the upwards revision of October and November figures mitigates this result a little
Employment gains in October and November were 38,000 higher than previously reported
For clarity, nothing I say is advice....
-
12-01-2014, 10:47 AM
#6237
Thanks peat. What it doesn't address is those who had work to be done & wanted to employ someone to do it but had to postpone it due to the extreme weather, i.e new jobs. It appears it only addresses people that lose their current employment due to weather.
Hopefully you find my posts helpful, but in no way should they be construed as advice. Make your own decision.
-
12-01-2014, 02:02 PM
#6238
"With a good perspective on history, we can have a better understanding of the past and present, and thus a clear vision of the future." — Carlos Slim Helu
-
12-01-2014, 03:48 PM
#6239
Originally Posted by JBmurc
The word 'guarantees' should be the warning signal. I've just taken delivery of a new book JB. It's called 'Annals of Gullibility', and goldbugs should buy a copy.
-
12-01-2014, 07:13 PM
#6240
Originally Posted by JBmurc
"higher' than what?
a) higher each month than its corresponding month of 2013? That's not going to happen (it was 1665USD on Jan 30, 2012)
b) higher at year end? Probably - but getting that information now is next to useless
c) higher on average for the year? Possibly - but again that is useless information now.
Emotive language with little commitment.
If the headline was "Long-term bullish run on gold has again kicked into gear - bears are once more on the back foot" then I would be more impressed.
BC
To foretell the future, one must first unlock the secrets of the past.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks