sharetrader
Page 21 of 62 FirstFirst ... 1117181920212223242531 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 210 of 618
  1. #201
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    paraparaumu, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    426

    Default

    I suspect us noteholders are damned if we do and damned if we don't.
    If/when NZF goes under are noteholders ranked equally with shareholders?
    I rolled mine over today, (not that my small amount will affect any equations).
    At least I can pick up 8% interest while it lasts.

  2. #202
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,045

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by QOH View Post
    If/when NZF goes under are noteholders ranked equally with shareholders?
    No, they are subordinated to the senior debt but are senior to the equity holders, in liquidation.
    Do not consider my postings as investment advice. I am here to share research and to speculate on what might be. The boundary between fact and conjecture might not always be clear - best to treat all comments as speculation.

  3. #203
    Guru Xerof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,005

    Default

    sorry to be the bearer of bad news QOH, but it's 6%

  4. #204
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,885

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xerof View Post
    sorry to be the bearer of bad news QOH, but it's 6%
    OOH bought the ones at a discout and said earlier he would be getting the equivalent to 8% .... one way of looking at eh .... but I think he agrees he is being pushed into doing something he doesn't want to do
    Last edited by winner69; 19-02-2011 at 06:35 PM.

  5. #205
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    paraparaumu, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    426

    Default

    Yes winner is right I bought them on secondary market and didn't pay face value. Yes I feel it's a lose lose situation whatever I chose.
    PS I'm a female not a male.

  6. #206
    Guru Xerof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,005

    Default

    Ah, Queen of Hearts, I hadn't seen your earlier comment. Well, a discount is better than a slap on the belly with a wet fish.

  7. #207
    Legend minimoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by getontoit99 View Post

    If 1/3rd of Capital Notes become shares, and the share price through the 20 business days to 15 March stays at 14.5c:

    1. 10,000 notes plus accrued interest = $10,244 (approx.)
    2. This buys 74,230 shares at 13.8c which is 95% of 14.5c.
    3. 6.6m Notes converting will create about 47.8 million new shares bringing the total on issue to about 125m.
    4. Dividing the current market capitalisation by 125m gives a new nominal price of 8.9c.


    Does this make sense?

    Thanks
    Scott
    If I may use your calcs getontoit - we have a bit more market data.

    Today the funs and games began with a $300 trade at $0.10. We also know 29.2% have gone for the notes. So lets assume Sp = $0.10 and take up of notes = 33%.
    1. $13.3m notes convert
    2. this buys 140,000,000 shares at $0.095 (95% of $0.10)
    3. Total on issue = 216,666,668
    4 Divide the current market cap by 216m gives a new nominal price of $0.035

    Please feel free to correct my math. My One eye isn't so good at reading lots of zeros.

  8. #208
    Member Tony Two Gloves's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    301

    Default

    I suppose that would be correct but the Liability of $13.3m disppears so their equity will increase by $13.3m. It will be interesting to see if this $13.3m increase in equity equates to $13.3m increase in market cap? If it does the new nominal price will be just under 0.10, we need a couple more trades around the 0.03 mark......

  9. #209
    Guru Xerof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,005

    Default

    Yeah, I agree with TTG, you need to assume makt cap is increased by the decrease in Liabilities.

    The salient point remains that Director shareholders effectively could lose control of the Company at 10 cents, and 33% uptake, although I guess the spread of new shareholders creates a disparate bunch of folks with no real interest in managing it

  10. #210
    Member Tony Two Gloves's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    301

    Default

    Yeah based on Mini's figures above I think the major shareholders would be left with approx 28% of the company. The biggest shareholder Callaghan would drop from 23% to around 8% ouch !!

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •