sharetrader
Page 57 of 85 FirstFirst ... 74753545556575859606167 ... LastLast
Results 561 to 570 of 847
  1. #561
    Legend peat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Whanganui, New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,437

    Default

    I dont think you'll find many here disagree, Traineeinvestor.
    For clarity, nothing I say is advice....

  2. #562
    ShareTrader Legend bull....'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    11,069

    Default

    big reason to believe there wont be a stock exchange if CGT goes ahead

    the apparent exclusion of Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs);

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=12195525

    why would you invest in the share market as an individual and pay up to 33% tax when you could invest in a pie for free?

    no normal person would so 20 - 30% of trading participants disappear nzx revenue declines markely and becomes a going concern as kiwisavers etc are passive holders.

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/...ectid=12195525
    one step ahead of the herd

  3. #563
    2019 NZ Stock Picking Winner silverblizzard888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,145

    Default

    The solution and problem are all in one word: COST!

    You make it cheaper to buy and sell shares, you will have more liquidity and more efficient markets. NZ has one of the least efficient markets I have seen, but I'm not complaining since it gives me plenty of time to find opportunities, but then when I do I just have to wait ages to have it recognized. Time is money and also risk of change in economic situation and missing out on other opportunities.

    You make it cheaper for companies to list and comply with disclosures. Why go public when you can raise funds from venture capital and have less cost and compliance?


    NZX itself must run a more lean set up. How does the NZX have more executives than the ASX? Yet many times small?

    How is it a $5million company can list in the ASX, but the NZX board is reluctant to let this happen?

  4. #564
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,612

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silverblizzard888 View Post
    The solution and problem are all in one word: COST!

    You make it cheaper to buy and sell shares, you will have more liquidity and more efficient markets. NZ has one of the least efficient markets I have seen, but I'm not complaining since it gives me plenty of time to find opportunities, but then when I do I just have to wait ages to have it recognized. Time is money and also risk of change in economic situation and missing out on other opportunities.

    You make it cheaper for companies to list and comply with disclosures. Why go public when you can raise funds from venture capital and have less cost and compliance?


    NZX itself must run a more lean set up. How does the NZX have more executives than the ASX? Yet many times small?

    How is it a $5million company can list in the ASX, but the NZX board is reluctant to let this happen?
    The state of the NZX is best described in one word - "Backdoors".

    Backdoor listings (with a couple of exceptions) have been huge disasters - from a financial, wealth destructive and perception point of view.

    After the shameful sham and total farce which was Plus SMS, NZX undertook to review backdoor listings - expectations were that they would be banned outright or tightened up considerably.

    Instead, NZX tried to copy the backdoor listing model by introducing NXT market!

    Next, we have the NZX paying its CEOs based upon unfathomable reward contracts so that even when they do not perform, they get rewarded generously - Weldon, Bennett and now, whatever his name is.

    Cry, the beloved country NZ - there is only one way to go and it's down, down for our capital markets.
    Last edited by Balance; 24-01-2019 at 05:03 PM.

  5. #565
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,612

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Mark Lister from Craig’s thinks great ...

    @marklisternz
    Great that @NZXGroup and @FMAmedia are doing something proactive for the benefit of our capital markets, which are crucial to the economy, for businesses to grow & create jobs, & our retirement savings. Let’s hope this attracts govt support …-website-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/attachments/NZ…
    In other words, NZX has screwed up (again) so looking for 'handouts' from the government. So much for the spirit of free enterprise!

    Remember this:

    Tim Bennett spent his time there 'rebuilding' the NZX - Weldon left it devoid of management depth and experience, devoid of ability to increase fees and charges (NZX is under threat from Commerce Commission investigation into monopolistic price gouging after fee increases went completely out of control under Weldon) but with a requirement to increase expenses to make NZX work. Then, there's the mess with Clear Grain.

    Tim's parting words in the parallel universe he lives in when he resigned : "the business has been rebuilt on 'a strong platform for growth and NZX is an attractive means to access capital!"

    Not as delusional however as exChairman Andrew Harmos's praise of Weldon when Weldon resigned - describing NZX having developed under golden boy Weldon as 'a thriving information, markets and infrastructure business, with a range of integrated business lines, a healthy balance sheet and a valuable set of options for future growth'.

    Poor old Tim found that Harmos meant the 'thriving' to be actually 'diving' and the 'valuable' had already gone with the $$$ in share options extracted by golden boy Weldon, courtesy of the sleeping board of directors.

  6. #566
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    443

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    In other words, NZX has screwed up (again) so looking for 'handouts' from the government. So much for the spirit of free enterprise!

    Remember this:

    Tim Bennett spent his time there 'rebuilding' the NZX - Weldon left it devoid of management depth and experience, devoid of ability to increase fees and charges (NZX is under threat from Commerce Commission investigation into monopolistic price gouging after fee increases went completely out of control under Weldon) but with a requirement to increase expenses to make NZX work. Then, there's the mess with Clear Grain.

    Tim's parting words in the parallel universe he lives in when he resigned : "the business has been rebuilt on 'a strong platform for growth and NZX is an attractive means to access capital!"

    Not as delusional however as exChairman Andrew Harmos's praise of Weldon when Weldon resigned - describing NZX having developed under golden boy Weldon as 'a thriving information, markets and infrastructure business, with a range of integrated business lines, a healthy balance sheet and a valuable set of options for future growth'.

    Poor old Tim found that Harmos meant the 'thriving' to be actually 'diving' and the 'valuable' had already gone with the $$$ in share options extracted by golden boy Weldon, courtesy of the sleeping board of directors.
    You should write a book on those two...dunno which one was worse, but they sure teach them all the tricks at McKinseys.

  7. #567
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    956

    Default

    Sad to see companies in a monopolistic position not able to do as well as they should. The nzx should be doing amazing things for nz from angel investing to growing existing large companies. Other horror of exchanges. Loan and bond facilities to companies and private market, and an array of associated services. They are in a position to present a massive and diverse range of products, but instead they do what monopolies do best: nothing, and everything inefficiently at the cost of their customers. Dumb.

  8. #568
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,612

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lewylewylewy View Post
    Sad to see companies in a monopolistic position not able to do as well as they should. The nzx should be doing amazing things for nz from angel investing to growing existing large companies. Other horror of exchanges. Loan and bond facilities to companies and private market, and an array of associated services. They are in a position to present a massive and diverse range of products, but instead they do what monopolies do best: nothing, and everything inefficiently at the cost of their customers. Dumb.
    Weldon and the board of misfit directors milked the monopoly for everything that the NZX could extract, with little consideration for the future of NZ.

    Now NZ Inc pays the price.

    Dumb is what John Key and his government did.

    Dumb is what the likes of Milford & Brian Gaynor did - praising and supporting Weldon in his single minded pursuit of milking NZX dry.

    Dumb is what Weldon did next - exposing himself for the incompetent buffoon manager he is by taking on MediaWorks and showing to the world what a misfit he is.

  9. #569
    Legend peat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Whanganui, New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,437

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Weldon and the board of misfit directors milked the monopoly for everything that the NZX could extract, with little consideration for the future of NZ.

    Now NZ Inc pays the price.

    Dumb is what John Key and his government did.

    Dumb is what the likes of Milford & Brian Gaynor did - praising and supporting Weldon in his single minded pursuit of milking NZX dry.

    Dumb is what Weldon did next - exposing himself for the incompetent buffoon manager he is by taking on MediaWorks and showing to the world what a misfit he is.
    Balance!
    Time to send all these records to the shredder, its seven years since Weldon ran the NZX even the IRD doesnt expect you to hold the data any longer.
    For clarity, nothing I say is advice....

  10. #570
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,612

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peat View Post
    Balance!
    Time to send all these records to the shredder, its seven years since Weldon ran the NZX even the IRD doesnt expect you to hold the data any longer.
    Would agree with you but for the fact that the NZX itself has done NOTHING substantial to reverse the diabolical decisions and directions put in place under Welson & the misfit directors.

    Until the NZX does, constant reminder required.

    Fonterra is yet another great NZ example of what happens when monopolies are allowed to be run for the greater benefit of the executives. At least the government took note, changed the monopolistic settings and we have the likes of ATM & Synlait showing just how ineffectual Fonterra has been as a forward thinking MONOPOLY.

    In the case of the NZX, John Key's government actually entrenched the monopoly settings! Folly upon folly.
    Last edited by Balance; 27-01-2019 at 09:23 AM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •