-
TIL - Trilogy [formerly ECO - Ecoya]
Cap raising today, any ideas as to what price considering that the $1.00 IPO has not been achieved post float
.65 per share as approx $12 mil is wanted from instos.
-
Originally Posted by whatsup
Cap raising today, any ideas as to what price considering that the $1.00 IPO has not been achieved post float
.65 per share as approx $12 mil is wanted from instos.
Shows the value of a share market listing eh?
Trilogy would have struggled to list by themselves even though they seem to a very well run company with a lot of growth potential. Have bought quite a few Trilogy products as presents for the women in my life as they all rave about their products.
Ecoya was struggling for respectability alone but with Trilogy should become a viable company over time.
As to the price, depends how much the bakery takes up I guess.
-
Originally Posted by whatsup
Cap raising today, any ideas as to what price considering that the $1.00 IPO has not been achieved post float
.65 per share as approx $12 mil is wanted from instos.
Cap raising at .75 and a SPP available to all holders.
-
Originally Posted by whatsup
Cap raising at .75 and a SPP available to all holders.
Cap raising looks like it has gone to the directors.
-
Originally Posted by Anna Naum
Cap raising looks like it has gone to the directors.
Well at least it is a sign of confidence.
-
Depends on how you see the glass. Two cap raisings now that Directors have had to front up for and that most large investors in the market have passed on.
-
Originally Posted by CJ
Well at least it is a sign of confidence.
Directors having to pick up the majority of the placement shares do not equate sign of confidence = institutions are not buying the story.
As for the over-subscription, yet another spin from the masters-of-spin.
Good on them though. NZ needs people like them.
-
Originally Posted by Anna Naum
Depends on how you see the glass. Two cap raisings now that Directors have had to front up for and that most large investors in the market have passed on.
Originally Posted by Balance
Directors having to pick up the majority of the placement shares do not equate sign of confidence = institutions are not buying the story.
I did mean sign of confidence from the directors, not the market in general. I wouldn't have thought Fyfe would put money in unless he thought it was a go-er. Personally I think I will wait for it to go lower before even thinking about it.
But as one of the few listings on the NZ market this year, it is interesting to follow.
-
Originally Posted by Balance
Directors having to pick up the majority of the placement shares do not equate sign of confidence = institutions are not buying the story.
As for the over-subscription, yet another spin from the masters-of-spin.
Good on them though. NZ needs people like them.
YEA Balance.......like a hole in the head! Masters of Spin are NOT required in this country or any country for that matter. They are deluding themselves and many unsuspecting folk out there that they have a viable business story to sell.........I very much doubt it. Their one and only interest I suspect is to do another "pump-and-dump" to line their own pockets.........and the best they cud manage is a candle making business.....OH PLEASE! OH DEAR GOD SPARE ME>>>wot an embarrasment to our market.
-
Member
Originally Posted by Balance
Directors having to pick up the majority of the placement shares do not equate sign of confidence = institutions are not buying the story.
Institutions know best do they?
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks