-
13-03-2018, 03:40 PM
#2981
I really appreciate everyone sharing their knowledge here. Thankyou. I try to DMOR but i have limited knowledge really. I sold out today after buying at 2.23 and 2.30, so am happy to move some to ERD and SML . I appreciate this info you share is not advice, but it does help a balanced view on a whole. Being a bit conservative, if it plummeted, i wouldn't be very happy, and again, a bird in the hand ....
-
13-03-2018, 03:44 PM
#2982
So what really are they buying , candles and smelling salts , hardly A2 is it !
-
13-03-2018, 04:42 PM
#2983
Originally Posted by whatsup
So what really are they buying , candles and smelling salts , hardly A2 is it !
Trilogy is a well established skincare and beauty care brand now - that's really what CITIC is buying.
-
14-03-2018, 11:20 AM
#2984
Just got back from the meeting. Pretty quick, less than 20mins.
Grant Baker pretty much just summarised what's already been said from previous announcements.
A shareholder expressed how people who paid $3.70 are going to lose money and TIL should be sold for a multiple more around 20, because there's heaps of other companies who trade on 20.
Grant Baker's response that the CITIC offer was the best that was presented to them.
Grant closed off by saying how it was a privilege to be chairman of Trilogy, with a nice applause after.
-
14-03-2018, 11:23 AM
#2985
Originally Posted by JayRiggs
Just got back from the meeting. Pretty quick, less than 20mins.
Grant Baker pretty much just summarised what's already been said from previous announcements.
A shareholder expressed how people who paid $3.70 are going to lose money and TIL should be sold for a multiple more around 20, because there's heaps of other companies who trade on 20.
Grant Baker's response that the CITIC offer was the best that was presented to them.
Grant closed off by saying how it was a privilege to be chairman of Trilogy, with a nice applause after.
Thanks Jay ..... sounds like most shareholders were happy
Hope OIO don't take too long to say yes .....be a bugger if they say NO now wouldn't it
Are they expecting a OIO decision by April 11th in saying thats when shares will be suspended
”When investors are euphoric, they are incapable of recognising euphoria itself “
-
14-03-2018, 11:42 AM
#2986
Originally Posted by winner69
Thanks Jay ..... sounds like most shareholders were happy
Hope OIO don't take too long to say yes .....be a bugger if they say NO now wouldn't it
Are they expecting a OIO decision by April 11th in saying thats when shares will be suspended
Hmmmm I'm afraid I didn't catch when the OIO decision will come, maybe someone else got it? It did feel like everything here on in is a formality.
-
14-03-2018, 11:47 AM
#2987
so over 99% voted in favour ....pretty resounding
Re OIO ....they have 'requested' a decision by March 31st
”When investors are euphoric, they are incapable of recognising euphoria itself “
-
14-03-2018, 11:49 AM
#2988
Originally Posted by winner69
so over 99% voted in favour ....pretty resounding
Re OIO ....they have 'requested' a decision by March 31st
OIO should not be a problem at all - no sensitive land or produce involved.
-
14-03-2018, 12:17 PM
#2989
Originally Posted by Balance
OIO should not be a problem at all - no sensitive land or produce involved.
So a happy ending for all shareholders
Good buying at $2.10 eh Balance
”When investors are euphoric, they are incapable of recognising euphoria itself “
-
14-03-2018, 12:38 PM
#2990
Originally Posted by winner69
So a happy ending for all shareholders
Good buying at $2.10 eh Balance
Always right to buy at $2.10 indeed!
Over and out to the next one so we can say it's always right to buy at $X.XX ....!!!!
The search begins!
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks