sharetrader

View Poll Results: Should there be a Capital Gains Tax on Property

Voters
131. You may not vote on this poll
  • No

    213 100.00%
  • Yes

    74 56.49%
  • Goff is just an idiot

    2,147,483,658 100.00%
  • Epic fail for Labour

    1,935 100.00%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 29 of 63 FirstFirst ... 1925262728293031323339 ... LastLast
Results 281 to 290 of 1008

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    IMO
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Floating Anchor Shoals
    Posts
    9,766

    Default

    Many do just that ,thats a cert.
    A set of cake knifes coming your way

  2. #2
    Guru
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    3,259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joshuatree View Post
    Many do just that ,thats a cert.
    A set of cake knifes coming your way
    Another moronic reply from you.

  3. #3
    IMO
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Floating Anchor Shoals
    Posts
    9,766

    Default

    Not all rich people are out to rip off the system but enough are and they employ experts to do just that with loopholes etc etc. Fact.

  4. #4
    always learning ... BlackPeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    9,497

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joshuatree View Post
    Not all rich people are out to rip off the system but enough are and they employ experts to do just that with loopholes etc etc. Fact.
    People are not better or worse depending on their bank balance. There is a certain percentage of people trying to rip of the system, and this percentage does not change whether they are rich (tax avoidance) or poor (tax and benefit fraud). Plenty of poor people like to work without paying taxes "you don't need a tax receipt - do you?" - not different to a rich (wo)man trying to hide their income overseas. Not sure about the non-performers, though - they might be worse in terms of ripping off the system.

    This constant rich people bashing is revolting and dumb. How do you think our (not so) Santa (but) Taxinda is paying all the lollies she distributed if the people paying the tax are going away?
    ----
    "Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    964

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackPeter View Post
    People are not better or worse depending on their bank balance. There is a certain percentage of people trying to rip of the system, and this percentage does not change whether they are rich (tax avoidance) or poor (tax and benefit fraud). Plenty of poor people like to work without paying taxes "you don't need a tax receipt - do you?" - not different to a rich (wo)man trying to hide their income overseas. Not sure about the non-performers, though - they might be worse in terms of ripping off the system.

    This constant rich people bashing is revolting and dumb. How do you think our (not so) Santa (but) Taxinda is paying all the lollies she distributed if the people paying the tax are going away?

    More revolting and dumb is your consistently snide comments re the PM as if she is personally responsible for all Labour policy. Criticise the policies not the messenger.

    The discussion is about whether higher income earners should pay more tax and whether CGT should be paid on unearned income. Not about rubbishing rich people.
    In my view NZ at the higher income levels has low taxation compared with other developed countries. As FP says loopholes in taxation are legitimate but wage and salary earners have little access to them. Whether wealthy immigrants are of value to NZ is questionable, A family with a couple of kids is possibly of more value.
    Also I think most of the arguments about CGT have little foundation in fact and are more personal objections to CGT especially seeing nothing has been set in concrete.

    westerly

  6. #6
    Legend minimoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by westerly View Post
    More revolting and dumb is your consistently snide comments re the PM as if she is personally responsible for all Labour policy. Criticise the policies not the messenger.
    To be fair Labour has very little policy. Its all being made up on the hoof. 9 years in opposition and nothing to show for it - which is why Labour cant articulate their CGT policy. Leaving it instead to her hand puppet Cullen who is still trying to stick it to rich pricks.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    1,063

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by westerly View Post
    More revolting and dumb is your consistently snide comments re the PM as if she is personally responsible for all Labour policy. Criticise the policies not the messenger.

    The discussion is about whether higher income earners should pay more tax and whether CGT should be paid on unearned income. Not about rubbishing rich people.
    In my view NZ at the higher income levels has low taxation compared with other developed countries. As FP says loopholes in taxation are legitimate but wage and salary earners have little access to them. Whether wealthy immigrants are of value to NZ is questionable, A family with a couple of kids is possibly of more value.
    Also I think most of the arguments about CGT have little foundation in fact and are more personal objections to CGT especially seeing nothing has been set in concrete.

    westerly
    You're incorrect about NZ having lower taxes for high income earners. I would be glad to match NZ's income tax, GST, & ACC to Canada's taxation level. It's well regarded Canada is a country known for high taxation - a key reason why I left 20+ years ago. As I mentioned before, absolute #s don't tell the whole story. You need to work out the buying power that a NZD has vs a CAD or USD has in their country?

    The problem I have with Jacinda is her BS talk about making NZ's tax system "fair". Like that video link 2 pages ago about the 3 characters who raised their own family and wanted to put up a fence in their community. If the highest earning family member all of a sudden left, moved abroad, then what would that leave for the other 2 resident families?

    You would be a fool to believe domestic $ alone is enough to keep NZ afloat. Foreign investment plays a big part of NZ. Almost all the banks in NZ are foreign, they won't stick around if the investment wasn't in NZ. Do you really want to wish that everyone ends up working for the gov't? It's an argument I had at my last social party I went to where a person suggested rich people don't pay enough. He couldn't understand that rich people don't just leave their $ in a bank account and drive fancy cars. Most derived their income from businesses (or investing in businesses) which provide employment. Take away the after tax profit incentive and then what would you have at the end? Remember, this is NZ - $ can easily flow out. What are the reason for those that worked hard to stick around? Canada has plenty of mountains and fresh water lakes ; it's nothing that NZ has is unique around the world.

    The question every NZ person should query is; How much of the tax revenue is paid by the rich or top 20%? and more importantly, how much MORE taxes do you expect the Labour Gov't to get from those top 20% before THEY start moving abroad? It's a very simple question.

  8. #8
    Legend
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sth Island. New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,448

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joshuatree View Post
    Not all rich people are out to rip off the system but enough are and they employ experts to do just that with loopholes etc etc. Fact.
    If a loophole exists it is perfectly legal to use it. It is not ripping off anything or anyone. It would be plain daft not to apply tax law to the best advantage, whether you are rich or poor.

  9. #9
    The past is practise. Vaygor1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Northland
    Posts
    923

    Default

    I found this February 2019 discussion on CGT with Roger Douglas very interesting.

    https://www.facebook.com/magictalkra...9582031549755/

    It is lengthy, but it is all worth listening to imho, in particular the first 24 minutes.

    Disc: Not a Roger Douglas fan by any stretch. As interesting as this discussion is, I offer no view on it.
    Last edited by Vaygor1; 02-03-2019 at 09:35 PM. Reason: Added disclosure

  10. #10
    IMO
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Floating Anchor Shoals
    Posts
    9,766

    Default

    Share a little before you go it will come back in spades. Cake knives your way.Learn and use.Never too late to become a giver 777
    Last edited by Joshuatree; 01-03-2019 at 06:37 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •