-
14-09-2018, 04:47 PM
#11361
-
14-09-2018, 04:50 PM
#11362
Originally Posted by percy
Received my FIN number today in the post, after I rang Link for it on Monday,so voted online.
Wife was able to vote via post the other day.
So we have done our bit.
You need a FIN number to sell shares. Does this mean that you are only buyer?
-
14-09-2018, 04:58 PM
#11363
Originally Posted by 777
You need a FIN number to sell shares. Does this mean that you are only buyer?
No my FIN number,and the wife's,are encrypted in Craigs' system.Craigs' can not tell me what it is. I had to ring the share registry to get it,and they only post it.
I get my correspondence via email,to save waste,and get hard/printed copy for the wife,so she had no trouble voting..
-
14-09-2018, 04:58 PM
#11364
They kindly emailed my FIN to me percy as long as i promised to delete the email.
Maybe like me 777, i forgot FIN and where i recorded it.
-
14-09-2018, 05:02 PM
#11365
Originally Posted by Joshuatree
They kindly emailed my FIN to me percy as long as i promised to delete the email.
Maybe like me 777, i forgot FIN and where i recorded it.
You must have a better phone manner than me.....lol.
Crazy but it was the same number I tried, that did not work on Sunday.
I put ours in a safe place,only trouble it was years ago and now I can't remember where that safe place was.Early or late stages of Alzheimers,I forget which.?
Last edited by percy; 14-09-2018 at 05:07 PM.
-
14-09-2018, 05:09 PM
#11366
Originally Posted by percy
You must have a better phone manner than me.....lol.
Crazy but it was the same number I tried, that did not work on Sunday.
I put ours in a safe place,only trouble it was years ago and now I can't remember where that safe place was.Early or late stages of Alzheimers,I forget which.?
Yes that’s what happened to me twice. Link systems are pretty crap at times
”When investors are euphoric, they are incapable of recognising euphoria itself “
-
14-09-2018, 08:08 PM
#11367
Member
Originally Posted by winner69
Link systems are pretty crap at times
But the Computershare website still makes Link look good!
-
14-09-2018, 10:05 PM
#11368
Originally Posted by BlackPeter
Maybe we talked cross purpose ... just in case you are referring to my posts. I absolutely agree that NZ would need a financial authority overseeing banks, insurance business and actually all listed companies. NZ seems still to be the wild west - too many crooked and incompetent boards (not referring to HBL here) and no authority seems to be seriously concerned to sort the mess out.
Whoever thinks that the RBNZ will protect them as shareholders is wrong.
So, yes - lets get some financial authority properly resourced (with teeth) and tasked to keep our boardrooms crook free and our companies playing to the rule book.
However - whoever thinks that the RBNZ is this authority in its current state is mistaken - at the moment the RBNZ is not doing more for shareholders than a "she'll be right" bumper sticker at the car. Only difference - the bumper sticker might be more funny and less damaging (remember - the RBNZ even prevented the CBL board to comply with the continuous disclosure regime). I am not sure whether RBNZ are the good guys. In my view they should be investigated by themselves before they are assumed to protect others
I don't think I was clear about what I had in mind by doubling down on what the Reserve Bank of New Zealand do in overseeing Heartland Bank.
There is a section in the annual report titled 'Capital Adequacy' with a subsection on 'Capital Ratios'. The 'Minimum Total Capital as Condition of Registration' for Heartland is listed as 8%.
While the Reserve Bank consider this restriction:
1/ Appropriate for the stability of the banking system.
they also consider it fair game to ...
2/ Give shareholders and deposit holders a haircut in pursuit of the stability of the banking system.
I am all for 1/ but not so keen on 2/. So to protect my interests as a shareholder and/or debenture holder I see that it will only be in my interest to invest in Heartland if:
'Minimum Total Capital as a Condition of Snoopy Investment' is >> 8% (That means much much greater than 8%).
Employing more people in the Reserve Bank compliance/regulation department won't do this. You have to make your own calculation taking into account what level of total backing capital that you think is acceptable. There is no reinvention of the wheel here. I would advocate exactly the same registration test that the Reserve Bank does, but with a suitably higher acceptable threshold.
SNOOPY
Last edited by Snoopy; 14-09-2018 at 10:18 PM.
Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7
-
14-09-2018, 11:18 PM
#11369
well set out Beagle.
As one great poster on this forum used to say every action sees a reaction. A sort of Newtons 3rd Law for the markets
I see this phase of HBL as undergoing a 'reaction' as a direct response to the 'action' of the last year.
Currently this is manifesting itself as a descending triangle , crudely shown here
Attachment 9932
which raises a possible target of $1.55. Indeed this matches a previous support/resistance zone in late 2016.
I am also seeing some divergence in the RSI which may point to a turnaround but its somehow not that convincing
Attachment 9935
What worries me is that right leaning H+S where we just gapped through the shoulder line. Even if the gap gets filled in a 'back to test' scenario its likely the downwards gap is portending lower prices.
Attachment 9934
I'll wait for clearer evidence of a reversal but will totally keep looking for it
My Mum has a reverse mortgage with CBA , quite possibly funded by HBL, its safe as houses I reckon, the limit is small compared to value, but it keeps her flush in cash which I reckon is nice.
For clarity, nothing I say is advice....
-
15-09-2018, 03:03 AM
#11370
Go for a dividend adjusted chart or use weekly bars and you have no gap to worry about
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks