-
28-05-2013, 02:38 PM
#1551
Originally Posted by Xerof
I think the last sentence of that paragraph suggests they are debating an early liquidation of those assets.
I was a bit harsh with my loan book decay observation....the decline was in those areas they want to decline, namely NCPA and house mortgages, so core business saw a small increase
Too harsh by far>>>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Increasing where they want.
Non-core property.A hit now would clear the air.Once we are past/clear of the non-core property assets I think we will see the SP react positively.
-
28-05-2013, 02:51 PM
#1552
Member
Well, I liked the result enough to buy some more today :-)
-
28-05-2013, 03:00 PM
#1553
Wouldn't either course of action potentially impact the full year result ?
yes, but to varying degrees. There is clearly a trade-off being assessed at the moment, between a bird in the hand (someone has made them an offer), and two in the bush (should we hold off and see if things improve)
now, now percy, don't exaggerate, core only grew by 53.7m, a growth rate of ~2.6%
Not saying thats a bad thing, just keeping it in perspective, and I agree with you, cleared decks will underpin the share price
-
28-05-2013, 03:00 PM
#1554
Originally Posted by SCOTTY
Well, I liked the result enough to buy some more today :-)
You are naughty,but I like you.!! lol.
Positive action will be well rewarded.!
-
28-05-2013, 03:05 PM
#1555
Originally Posted by Xerof
yes, but to varying degrees. There is clearly a trade-off being assessed at the moment, between a bird in the hand (someone has made them an offer), and two in the bush (should we hold off and see if things improve)
now, now percy, don't exaggerate, core only grew by 53.7m, a growth rate of ~2.6%
Not saying thats a bad thing, just keeping it in perspective, and I agree with you, cleared decks will underpin the share price
Growth [modest] coupled will savings on operating costs and lower borrowing [marac bonds] costs will certainly help the bottom line.
Last edited by percy; 28-05-2013 at 03:07 PM.
-
28-05-2013, 08:28 PM
#1556
http://www.interest.co.nz/business/6...rvices-company
Lost biz for heartland the story says
Jeff not responding to the journos ....seems to be a habit of his
Wonder how much involved?
-
28-05-2013, 08:32 PM
#1557
Didn't read it properly .....reads as if heartland lost 2 bits of biz .....Suzuki and Nissan
Maybe wasn't profitable for them ....but obviously UFC thought the Suzuki business was
-
28-05-2013, 08:43 PM
#1558
Originally Posted by winner69
Didn't read it properly .....reads as if heartland lost 2 bits of biz .....Suzuki and Nissan
Maybe wasn't profitable for them ....but obviously UFC thought the Suzuki business was
hopefully it will not be domino effect.
-
28-05-2013, 08:52 PM
#1559
Originally Posted by winner69
Didn't read it properly .....reads as if heartland lost 2 bits of biz .....Suzuki and Nissan
Maybe wasn't profitable for them ....but obviously UFC thought the Suzuki business was
Part of Marac's core business.So will have an impact.Both Mazda and Suzuki would be sound important accounts.
-
28-05-2013, 09:27 PM
#1560
Originally Posted by percy
Part of Marac's core business.So will have an impact.Both Mazda and Suzuki would be sound important accounts.
It could be that both vehicle companies wanted to lower their finance rates to buyers to give an incentive to purchase a new Mazda etc. Or even a used one! Plus there must be lots of cash sloshing around in Japan looking for a home. It will have an impact, but so will paying off the $100 million bond. They could end up neutral.
Cash is to be made in financing the contractors equipment for the Christchurch re-build. Heartland could have more requests for cash than they can deal with. We are looking at a finance company that has been redecorated and converted to a Bank. (But is still a finance company!).
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks