-
29-07-2015, 03:14 PM
#5721
Originally Posted by macduffy
As other banks' NZ business is about 10% of their total, their exposure to NZ dairying, while much bigger in absolute dollar terms, is about 1.5% of their total business. (15% of the 10%).
Correct.
ANZ has reduced their exposure at 31/3/2015 to $11.3 billion,so as you point out it is only a small % of their total business.
However, if you read this thread, I have been ridiculed for saying HNZ did not have the same exposure as the Aussie banks .
Like you, I am a great admirer of the Australian banks, and have only been doing comparisons, so people have a true picture that HNZ's dairying exposure has been low.
Yes the slow down in dairying will affect all NZ,but will have very little effect on HNZ's profit.
-
29-07-2015, 03:20 PM
#5722
Jonas not being replaced
That should add $1 million to the bottom line
Good eh
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
-
29-07-2015, 03:28 PM
#5723
Yep
"HNZ’s balance sheet is in a strong position. The non-replacement of the Head of Strategic &Product Development’s position suggests less focus will be placed on value-accretiveacquisitions and more attention will be on organic growth. The latter is less capital intensive and lower risk"
-
29-07-2015, 03:30 PM
#5724
HNZ's approach to dairy customers that are presently going backwards is to simply keep supporting their clients through this...which of course implies that there is some light at the end of this very long and very dark dairy tunnel but what if like Iron Ore being depressed for many years we see the same pattern replicated with dairy ? How many years do they keep throwing good money at sharemilkers and farmers with unviable operations at the present low price, let alone if it falls further ? Lets all try and forget that Fitch a few months ago were warning regarding credit rating with dairy problems shall we ?
I see nothing, nothing at all. http://www.shutterstock.com/s/ostric...line=217847644
Last edited by Beagle; 29-07-2015 at 03:34 PM.
-
29-07-2015, 03:32 PM
#5725
So Target of $1.30 is unchanged from several months ago.
So the 12 month target has been stretched to a 18 month target
Hardly stellar is it?
What's CETI anyway
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
-
29-07-2015, 03:35 PM
#5726
Originally Posted by Joshuatree
Yep
"HNZ’s balance sheet is in a strong position. The non-replacement of the Head of Strategic &Product Development’s position suggests less focus will be placed on value-accretiveacquisitions and more attention will be on organic growth. The latter is less capital intensive and lower risk"
Did he get the sack then because the last acquisition hasn't been 'value accretive'
Just a thought
But that $1 million saved can shore the profits up from here on in eh
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
-
29-07-2015, 03:41 PM
#5727
One good thing is that Craig's have many believers and a BUY on Heartland should give the share price a boost over the next day or two.
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
-
29-07-2015, 03:56 PM
#5728
Originally Posted by winner69
Did he get the sack then because the last acquisition hasn't been 'value accretive'
Just a thought
But that $1 million saved can shore the profits up from here on in eh
Might be value accretive after all
-
29-07-2015, 04:23 PM
#5729
-
29-07-2015, 05:09 PM
#5730
Originally Posted by winner69
One good thing is that Craig's have many believers and a BUY on Heartland should give the share price a boost over the next day or two.
Your be hoping they are not at all accurate with valuation of Sum at $3.71 aye (12 month target) actually come to think of it Roger likes Craig's valuation on that stock? What am I missing here?
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks