sharetrader
Page 690 of 1722 FirstFirst ... 19059064068068668768868969069169269369470074079011901690 ... LastLast
Results 6,891 to 6,900 of 17213
  1. #6891
    Dilettante
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Down & out
    Posts
    5,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blockhead View Post
    I just discovered it makes a difference HNZ or HBL, HBL shows sales history, HNZ doesn't.

    Blocky needs to get with the latest tickers !
    Yes this was a strange one. It did update automatically in the Portfolio but not on the Watchlist. So after deleting HNZ from Watchlist and entering HBL, all is honky dory

  2. #6892
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,739

    Default

    Heartland says "Key drivers of growth for Heartland are GDP and employment"

    Great news then

    @ANZ_cambagrie: Bumper December Truckometer (Heavy Traffic Index +2.6%) suggests NZ Q4 GDP may be well north of 1% q/q. https://t.co/n896N2egcY

    Heartland share price bit slack of late

    If Jeff right about what drives heartland profit they should be rolling in it.

    C'mon boys - get things firing on all cylinders
    Last edited by winner69; 14-01-2016 at 11:35 AM.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  3. #6893
    Senior Member kizame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Tauranga, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    717

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Heartland says "Key drivers of growth for Heartland are GDP and employment"

    Great news then

    @ANZ_cambagrie: Bumper December Truckometer (Heavy Traffic Index +2.6%) suggests NZ Q4 GDP may be well north of 1% q/q. https://t.co/n896N2egcY

    Heartland share price bit slack of late

    If Jeff right about what drives heartland profit they should be rolling in it.

    C'mon boys - get things firing on all cylinders
    Calm down winner, share price is a bit slack of late cos of the markets,crikey you expect a bit much mate.And in fact the shareprice has held up pretty well considering.
    I'm sure they feel your pressure to perform and will follow with a great result.

  4. #6894
    Missed by that much
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    898

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joshuatree View Post
    Join the dots for me please percy. I don't want a share reduction or the cash.I will have to pay my broker to get back to my same holding; whats the point??? Thanks in advance.
    I have been trying to see whether it is worth increasing my holding before the share buy back or after. At the SHM it was shown that the value of shares would not change, just the number that one would hold. There is quite a bit of information not given that will require some assumptions, but I have done a quick analysis to see what might happen to the share price after the buy back.

    The asumptions I have made are:
    The tier 2 capital raising will achieve the full oversubscription of $75M
    The interest payable will be 5% and that interest will be tax deductible for NPAT calcs
    Issued shares will increase prior to buyback in line with the DRP on a similar ratio to the previous year.
    NTA (per share) for 2016 will increase due to the retained earnings from 2015
    Without the Tier 2 capital the 2016 NPAT would have been close to $53M

    The results I obtained are
    2015
    2016
    Buyback
    Shares issued 473646830 437308000
    Tier 2 $75M
    Reduce NPAT by $2.8M
    NPAT 48 50
    NTA 0.895 0.923
    EPS 0.103 0.114
    Div 0.075 0.085

    This suggests that the share price is likely to increase from my assumed $1.30 to $1.47 by the end of FY 2016
    Last edited by Jantar; 14-01-2016 at 12:31 PM.

  5. #6895
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,739

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jantar View Post
    I have been trying to see whether it is worth increasing my holding before the share buy back or after. At the SHM it was shown that the value of shares would not change, just the number that one would hold. There is quite a bit of information not given that will require some assumptions, but I have done a quick analysis to see what might happen to the share price after the buy back.

    The asumptions I have made are:
    The tier 2 capital raising will achieve the full oversubscription of $75M
    The interest payable will be 5% and that interest will be tax deductible for NPAT calcs
    Issued shares will increase prior to buyback in line with the DRP on a similar ratio to the previous year.
    NTA (per share) for 2016 will increase due to the retained earnings from 2015
    Without the Tier 2 capital the 2016 NPAT would have been close to $53M

    The results I obtained are
    2015
    2016
    Buyback
    Shares issued 473646830 437308000
    Tier 2 $75M
    Reduce NPAT by $2.8M
    NPAT 48 50
    NTA 0.895 0.923
    EPS 0.103 0.114
    Div 0.075 0.085

    This suggests that the share price is likely to increase from my assumed $1.30 to $1.47 by the end of FY 2016
    In theory you are correct - based on your assumption that the PE ratio stays the same. (Higher eps at same PE = higher share price)

    But also in theory the PE should reduce because of the new capital (bonds) from an shareholders perspective their investment is more risky.


    In practice the answer will likely be somewhere in between .....but we'll never know what the answer is because other things (maybe a profit upgrade) will always happen.

    If you are convinced of your workings shouldn't you buy before the buy-back because the price might 'adjust' quickly .....but then again the impact of the buyback might already be factored into today's price (as per one of Rogers post shortly after the buy back was announced)
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  6. #6896
    Missed by that much
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    898

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    ..... If you are convinced of your workings shouldn't you buy before the buy-back because the price might 'adjust' quickly .....but then again the impact of the buyback might already be factored into today's price (as per one of Rogers post shortly after the buy back was announced)
    That is also what I conclude. Better to buy before rather than after.

  7. #6897
    Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    3,025

    Default

    The value will be the same before and after because the market will have/has factored it in. If there was an arbitrage, as you are trying to work out, someone with more time and money on their hands would have already figured it out, traded it and removed the arbitrage (assumes fully efficient markets which isn't the case).

  8. #6898
    Missed by that much
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    898

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Harvey Specter View Post
    The value will be the same before and after because the market will have/has factored it in. If there was an arbitrage, as you are trying to work out, someone with more time and money on their hands would have already figured it out, traded it and removed the arbitrage (assumes fully efficient markets which isn't the case).
    Just my opinion, but I don't think it could be fully factored in until after the interim dividend is announced.

    Even if you are correct, and it has already been fully factored in then it would still be better to buy before rather than after in order to get the full impact of the interim dividend and the tax free buy back.

  9. #6899
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,739

    Default

    Heartland says "Key drivers of growth for Heartland are GDP and employment"

    Great news then -

    New Zealand workers became more optimistic about their job prospects in the December quarter, with employees feeling more secure and expecting future pay rises.

    Should ave led to more consumer borrowing

    I be very disappointed if Heartland doesn't raise the F16 guidance when H1 announced

    Otherwise the guys have been taking it too easy and resting on their laurels
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  10. #6900
    Senior Member kizame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Tauranga, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    717

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Heartland says "Key drivers of growth for Heartland are GDP and employment"

    Great news then -

    New Zealand workers became more optimistic about their job prospects in the December quarter, with employees feeling more secure and expecting future pay rises.

    Should ave led to more consumer borrowing

    I be very disappointed if Heartland doesn't raise the F16 guidance when H1 announced

    Otherwise the guys have been taking it too easy and resting on their laurels
    No they won't raise it. They are conservative and would have been able to see where the economy was headed short-medium term.
    If I was them it would be far better to surprise on the upside than to try to quench your insatiable need for reassurance.

    Resting on there Laurels? I don't think so.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •