sharetrader
Page 867 of 1733 FirstFirst ... 3677678178578638648658668678688698708718779179671367 ... LastLast
Results 8,661 to 8,670 of 17326
  1. #8661
    Super Investor
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    1,303

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snoopy View Post
    Sorry should have used the 'fair value share price' as a bas, not the current share price! Have corrected my post (sell down price now $1.74).

    SNOOPY
    I don't understand why you have a sell price for a share that you don't even own.
    h2

  2. #8662
    Guru
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,601

    Default

    So you wouldn't consider selling till it at $1.74, yet you think it is overvalued at $1.55?
    So how overvalued does a share have to be until you decide to sell it?

  3. #8663
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by h2so4 View Post
    I don't understand why you have a sell price for a share that you don't even own.
    Two answers to that.

    1/ I study HBL as a 'value benchmark' for the finance sector shares I do own: ANZ and WBC. So knowing where the value of HBL is in the market, relative to the other two, is useful to me.

    2/ The 'Capitalisation of Dividends Valuation' that I did produced:

    2a/ an 'average value' AND
    2b/ a 'buy value' (as a non-owner that is of interest to me) AND
    2c/ a 'sell value'

    all as outputs of a single analysis.

    IOW, it wasn't really any extra work to produce the 'sell value', which might be of interest to those that do hold. So I printed it.

    SNOOPY
    Last edited by Snoopy; 16-02-2017 at 06:22 PM.
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

  4. #8664
    Super Investor
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    1,303

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snoopy View Post
    Two answers to that.

    1/ I study HBL as a 'value benchmark' for the finance sector shares I do own: ANZ and WBC. So knowing where the value of HBL is in the market, relative to the other two, is useful to me.

    2/ The 'Capitalisation of Dividends Valuation' that I did produced:

    2a/ an 'average value' AND
    2b/ a 'buy value' (as a non-owner that is of interest to me) AND
    2c/ a 'sell value'

    all as outputs of a single analysis.

    IOW, it wasn't really any extra work to produce the 'sell value', which might be of interest to those that do hold. So I printed it.

    SNOOPY
    Well I'm impressed SD.
    h2

  5. #8665
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    803

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by h2so4 View Post
    Well I'm impressed SD.
    Me too,and would probably be even more so if I knew what IOW meant

  6. #8666
    Missed by that much
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    898

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by davflaws View Post
    Me too,and would probably be even more so if I knew what IOW meant
    In other words are you saying you do not understand common abreviations?

  7. #8667
    Reincarnated Panthera Snow Leopard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Private Universe
    Posts
    5,860

    Default Beware the Texas Library Association (TLA) it is over used and much abused

    Quote Originally Posted by davflaws View Post
    Me too,and would probably be even more so if I knew what IOW meant
    IOW = Institut für Ostseeforschung Warnemünde

    IOW = Isle Of Wight



    In other words it can mean many things

    Best Wishes
    Paper Tiger
    om mani peme hum

  8. #8668
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trader_jackson View Post
    So you wouldn't consider selling till it at $1.74, yet you think it is overvalued at $1.55?
    So how overvalued does a share have to be until you decide to sell it?
    Actually I said I would be selling down from $1.74 (cum dividend) because the share would be 20% above my fair valuation. I didn't say I wouldn't consider selling at a lesser price.

    I might sell at a price less than $1.74, but above $1.42 (my fair value price) if I found something better to invest in. The problem is, in this market, really good investment opportunities are hard to come by. Selling something above fair value, only to buy something else above fair value, doesn't necessarily make me better off.

    However if something is very clearly overvalued to a significant degree, and I would argue Heartland at $1.74 would fit that category, then I would consider reducing my holding and putting that money in a 2% call account until another opportunity arose somewhere else in the market.

    SNOOPY
    Last edited by Snoopy; 16-02-2017 at 11:34 PM.
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

  9. #8669
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    924

    Default

    Wow that last page was a painful read.

    The SP has been extremely stable for the last 6 months, even through the elections saga. People obviously see fair value in this share around its current value.

    Looking forward to the results, they're delivering nicely at the moment and out of most banks in New Zealand have the most room for growth and profit expansion over the next 5 years.

  10. #8670
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Masterton, , NZ.
    Posts
    2,250

    Default

    Think they would have been firmer but for the share placement lingering expecting announcement with result this week

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •