sharetrader
Page 104 of 146 FirstFirst ... 45494100101102103104105106107108114 ... LastLast
Results 1,031 to 1,040 of 1456
  1. #1031
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    630

    Default

    Trans Tasman Resources having another go, after all

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/7454...re-from-seabed.

  2. #1032
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Ak
    Posts
    413

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NT001 View Post
    Trans Tasman Resources having another go, after all

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/7454...re-from-seabed.

    He is such a joker that Chris Castle chap.....Anyone tempted to donate money to a cause should perhaps consider the City Mission instead!
    Last edited by Crackity; 30-11-2015 at 10:10 PM.

  3. #1033
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,714

    Default

    https://www.nzx.com/companies/CRP/announcements/274545

    Oh dear - $800k.

    I do like this though from Chris Castle : “We have a duty of care to our shareholders regarding money spent.”

    Give the guy a knighthood - he is a LEGEND!

  4. #1034
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Wellington, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    1,701

    Default

    The EPA won't be happy carrying this outstanding debt on their books and will be under pressure to do something.

    They must have known that CRP would take some legal action, given the to-ing and fro-ing on the disputed amount. I'm thinking they will be OK with getting the courts to decide who should pay what. Then they don't need to take responsibility, and if CRP falls over because of the action, blame the judge.

    I have run across such an approach before by a government department - twice in fact. Money not quite in the same league! In each case, the department offered no defence - it was cheaper and easier (for them) to let someone else decide. After all it wasn't their money. In one case, the court decided, in the other it was a review panel. Won both times - well, no defence was offered.

    Not saying that is that is the case here, but would not be surprised if only a half hearted defence to CRP is offered. In which case CRP might get costs.

  5. #1035
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    192

    Default

    Might have slipped under the radar

    https://www.nzx.com/companies/CRP/announcements/277005

    Hopefully this will help convince the environmental benefits of using rock phosphate!

    Since using conflict phosphate isn't a good enough reason to switch

  6. #1036
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Wellington, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    1,701

    Default

    Announcement from CRP today that the Ombudsman has agreed to investigate the way the EPA handled CRP's application for marine resource consent. That is a good thing.

    On the face of it CRP has some compelling issues, which Mr Castle has made public in the past.

    Of course the EPA may have equally compelling issues.



    Watching with interest .....

  7. #1037
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    266

    Default

    https://www.anzsecurities.co.nz/Dire...spx?id=4098640

    whos got 600K to give to CC?? any ideas?

  8. #1038
    IMO
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Floating Anchor Shoals
    Posts
    9,762

    Default

    Great book review on national radio."we are intrinsically trusting. Almost anybody can get conned if the artist is clever enough. The Confidence game" by Maria konnikovaand why we fall for it every time explores the technique of the con "etc. Con Artists convince you that it was your idea. Bernie madoff created waiting lists so people were relieved when he finally took their money. "Im not taking anything from you I'm taking what i deserve."

  9. #1039
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    132

    Default

    Announcement today:

    https://www.nzx.com/companies/CRP/announcements/278981

    Particularly interested in the last paragraph "CRP holds a strategic, multi-million tonne organic rock phosphate deposit uniquely positioned to access Asian and Australasian fertiliser markets. It was granted a 20-year mining licence in 2013" which is true, but they forgot to mention some pertinent information along the lines of (these are my words not theirs of course) "however the Government has since told us to f**k off and sent us an invoice for $2.7 million to cover their costs of writing a letter which in summation read 'get f**ked'"

  10. #1040
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    20

    Default

    The identity of the mystery $600k contributor is now out (NZX release today)
    George Wong Kim Pau and Happy Sim
    Bit of digging, they are based in Singapore but both have a 5% shareholding in CASS offshore minerals.
    Cass Offshore Minerals Limited (CASS) was established as the parent Company to both Ironsands Offshore Mining Limited and Pacific Offshore Mining.
    Some very interesting stuff about these companies on the website http://cassom.com/

    Don't know what to make of it, they obviously see potential in CRP but are they investing based on how their other projects are going or is it based on pure speculation?


Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •