sharetrader
Page 23 of 28 FirstFirst ... 13192021222324252627 ... LastLast
Results 221 to 230 of 276
  1. #221
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,240

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kiwico View Post
    Just don't die while holding US held shares/ETFs!
    Sage advice.!

  2. #222
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    112

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kiwico View Post
    I agree - that's why I use Interactive Brokers for Vanguard ETFs and buy them on the NYSE - much lower transaction costs and much less lost in the transfer from NZD to USD (and back). Just don't die while holding US held shares/ETFs!
    What happens? You mean your next of kin can’t inherit US held investments? My US stocks are held by ASB as custodian (not direct holdings) so I expect my nok won’t have any problems accessing them.

  3. #223
    Guru
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,715

    Default

    couta :that"s the smartest thing I have read all day.The majority of investor's in shares over the last few years should be feeling quite smug now BUT Watch the stampede through a tight exit if there is a 'significant event'
    Who is buying ETF's ?The least savy or the more savy?Time will tell.

  4. #224
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    187

    Default

    I'm totally confused now regarding the overseas Smartshares funds and their standing within a FIF. I'm told that if I just owned Smartshares overseas funds (TWF, ASD etc) then they would not be caught within the FIF regime and even if my holdings wwere greater than $50,000 I would not have to declare them as a FIF. Tax would have been paid by Smartsheres. However, if I also owned other FIF investments they would then count towards the total value of a FIF? Bit of a bugger as I've deliberately kept my other overseas investments just below the $50,000 threshold as the FIF thing is a nightmare for me and now my Smartshares holding would push me well over..

  5. #225
    Guru
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    3,233

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackCross View Post
    I'm totally confused now regarding the overseas Smartshares funds and their standing within a FIF. I'm told that if I just owned Smartshares overseas funds (TWF, ASD etc) then they would not be caught within the FIF regime and even if my holdings wwere greater than $50,000 I would not have to declare them as a FIF. Tax would have been paid by Smartsheres. However, if I also owned other FIF investments they would then count towards the total value of a FIF? Bit of a bugger as I've deliberately kept my other overseas investments just below the $50,000 threshold as the FIF thing is a nightmare for me and now my Smartshares holding would push me well over..
    Unnecessary worry on your part as I understand it. The fund would be subject to FIF but you with a share in the fund are not.

  6. #226
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    I need to talk to them but my preliminary thinking is that as the Smartshares funds are PIE's (Portfolio investment entities) and they pay the FIF taxes under N.Z. tax law these are PIE's not FIF's so you are okay with just under $50,000 in other FIF's as well as Smartshares funds or up to $100,000 if owned jointly.
    Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.
    Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine

  7. #227
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    223

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonboyz View Post
    What happens? You mean your next of kin can’t inherit US held investments? My US stocks are held by ASB as custodian (not direct holdings) so I expect my nok won’t have any problems accessing them.
    It's always a good idea to try to not die anyway but refer to Voltage's comments below from the Should I actively avoid FIF investments thread.

    Quote Originally Posted by voltage View Post
    Jonathan, you must beware of other issues with US ETFs. The main one is death duty tax is liable on any holding over $60000 for non US residents. This is why you need to look a non US domiciled ETfs.

  8. #228
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    Hmmm...wonder if that just applies to the U.S. ETF holdings ? Another reason to keep it simple with Smartshares ?
    My good mate's father in law who has a net worth of north of US$30m has spent the last 3 1/2 years with lawyers and accountants fighting death duties from various countries tax jurisdictions since his wife passed away. The problem being that at various times in their lives they've lived in a variety of different countries and now almost all of them want their cut ! Not sure how much he's spent on lawyers and accountants so far but there is speculation within the family it could be up to $1m now
    Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.
    Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine

  9. #229
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beagle View Post
    Hmmm...wonder if that just applies to the U.S. ETF holdings ?
    It is not just ETF holdings, it is any US domiciled investment (Direct Shares, US Mutual Funds etc.). If you die with more than US$60,000 of these you will be subject to US estate taxes on the balance. How they are able to administer/enforce this is debatable. If the shares are owned by a trust or company you are probably OK because they would not form part of your estate. If it worries you, probably best not to own US ETFs directly. There are ASX equivalents not domiciled in the US, or use the Smartshares wrapper to avoid the entire issue, accepting the extra cost.

  10. #230
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    36

    Default

    I used to try and avoid FIF because I didn't understand it. It seemed complex and scary. But once I understood it, it's actually pretty straightforward. In some cases it is a big advantage. For example, if you own Aussie unit trusts, they must distribute all their capital gains every year on June 30th. If they have a good year that could be a significant distribution. If you are outside FIF (under 50K) you will have to pay tax on the full distribution as income but if you account for it under FIF (FDR), you only pay tax on 5% of the opening value no matter what the distributions are.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •