If National wins ...

[777]

Good on you elz not stooping to the petty , sniping, childish, brittle, meanspiritedness on here.

Like yourself.

[winner69]

....

I don't know how this is going to pan out but hope the change happens that people want away from a lying unprincipled leadership to an open positive more collaborative one.

I would say that happening is a pipe dream

[minimoke]

I don't know how this is going to pan out but hope the change happens that people want away from a lying unprincipled leadership to an open positive more collaborative one.
.

What change do you think people want?
Election results show they do want the Maori Party in Parliament.

They show they don't want NZ first to have as many seats. 9 now compared to 11 last time

They show they don't want Greens to have as many seats. 8 now compared with 14 last time.

They show they want ACT keeping the status quo with one seat compared with one seat last time.

They show 2.4% prefer TOP over any other party

And its proof no-one wanted Labour Policy under Andrew Little. Which is proof the Labour voters prefer style over substance.

[minimoke]

Caught out again mm.I note you've avoided the water issue too since my posting about the going price some irrigators are prepared to pay for it,being $1-$1.50 a cubic metre .Farcical.

Wheres the water thread? If its not an issue relevant enough to have its own thread I'm going to struggle finding your point amongst the babble in these general threads.

[BlackPeter]

Wheres the water thread?

Here we go:

https://www.sharetrader.co.nz/showth...-and-waterways
https://www.sharetrader.co.nz/showth...r-to-Tax-Water

One of the problems with the prolific creation of new threads is that people don't see anymore the forest for the trees ...

[minimoke]

Here we go:


https://www.sharetrader.co.nz/showth...r-to-Tax-Water

One of the problems with the prolific creation of new threads is that people don't see anymore the forest for the trees ...

Well its not that one - no mention of $1 - $1.50 there

[minimoke]

Here we go:

https://www.sharetrader.co.nz/showth...-and-waterways


One of the problems with the prolific creation of new threads is that people don't see anymore the forest for the trees ...

And its not that one - no mention of $1 - $1.50 there either. Looks like we need to head into a different forest

[BlackPeter]

You asked where the water thread is ... not where JT's fantasies come from. To investigate the latter I suggest to look into his head ...

[winner69]

Nats got 21k more votes than 2014

Labour got 351k more votes and Greens 95k less (NZF 22k less as a note)

One could say that 250k or so voters voted for the exciting new kid on the block in Jacinda .....rather than kicking out the encumbent government

Can she prove to those masses she can meet their expectations


Somethign wrong when so many less than last time vote for Winnies party but he apparently has so much power

[minimoke]

One could say that 250k or so voters voted for the exciting new kid on the block in Jacinda .....rather than kicking out the encumbent government

Can she prove to those masses she can meet their expectations

You could say that - but you would be wrong.

Jacinda might be able to say she is the exciting new kid on the block if the Jacindamania experienced in the advanced voting supported her. It didn't.

In the advance / Special votes National picked up 45.5% of the advance votes. Labour only managed 36.7%

Jacinda wasn't even able to meet advance vote expectations

(Not even Labour and NZ First combined got more than Nationals share of advanced vote. Obviously no cry for change there.)