-
11-12-2013, 10:23 AM
#1501
Today's announcements haven't exactly put a rocket under the share price have they.
Resistance at 133 will need to be broken before I'm convinced that the bears are no longer in control.
Edit: Well it took 60 mins but there's now some bullish sentiment that's lifted the sp above 133. Looks like time to buy as a short term trade.
Last edited by Bobcat.; 11-12-2013 at 11:23 AM.
To foretell the future, one must first unlock the secrets of the past.
-
11-12-2013, 11:57 AM
#1502
Interesting.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/n...170733&ref=rss
When added with the comments made by JBWere's to "Lower your NZ exposure, to all NZ securities"
From my experience when a company uses words like "find ways to address a funding gap", the result is commonly a significant decrease in the quality of materials used to finish/complete the job.
There is more than one type of fibre cable, some are high bandwidth, same are medium, some are low
There is more than one make/model of Fibre Router. Some are industrial grade high volume devices, some... are not
There are other "devices" required to be placed inside each Telephone Exchange where the fibre terminates... again they are either quality/ or not
This whole thing is turning into a joke, and its backfired on us the public.
Last edited by arc; 11-12-2013 at 12:24 PM.
-
11-12-2013, 12:18 PM
#1503
Originally Posted by arc
Sue Sheldons comments ..advertising via media to the world' investors that NZ investment reputation is tarnished will not win her any friends in high places.... nor from NZ corporate.....I suspect she will activate damage control when her Xmas Cards fail to arrive in the mail....
-
11-12-2013, 12:18 PM
#1504
Originally Posted by arc
Of course the silly cow (who has presided over horrendous costs over-runs and delays) is now trying to shift the blame to others.
DO YOUR JOB, WOMAN!
As one NBR poster summarised :
"Is Chorus NZ's worst managed and worst-governed company?
Methinks they take both prizes, exceeding even the old finance companies, the old Air NZ under private ownership, Feltex, the old Telecom - jeez the list of contenders goes on and on.
Not sure why Chorus shareholders are not demanding change in directors and senior management, who cannot run a company - a regulated monopoly! - for the benefit of shareholders."
Last edited by Balance; 11-12-2013 at 12:56 PM.
-
11-12-2013, 01:00 PM
#1505
Seemed quite straightforward to me
no dividends, a rights issue, and a degradation of service to cut costs
and everyone elses fault - commcomm and Labour/greens
Last edited by Xerof; 11-12-2013 at 01:02 PM.
-
11-12-2013, 01:25 PM
#1506
Originally Posted by Xerof
Seemed quite straightforward to me
no dividends, a rights issue, and a degradation of service to cut costs
and everyone elses fault - commcomm and Labour/greens
Yep...That will do Xerof.........but you forgot to add performance bonuses for top management
-
11-12-2013, 01:35 PM
#1507
Originally Posted by Hoop
Yep...That will do Xerof.........but you forgot to add performance bonuses for top management
...and Government putting some sweetners into the CNU/CFH contract variation so as (to be seen to) recover some integrity in the NZ investment environment, without having to intervene by way of limited ownership or legislation. Key and his sidekicks will need to walk the tightrope on this one.
To foretell the future, one must first unlock the secrets of the past.
-
11-12-2013, 03:07 PM
#1508
Originally Posted by Hoop
Sue Sheldons comments ..advertising via media to the world' investors that NZ investment reputation is tarnished will not win her any friends in high places.... nor from NZ corporate.....I suspect she will activate damage control when her Xmas Cards fail to arrive in the mail....
I guess she's just batting for her team like anyone would and in any case she's already in high places - on the boards of RBNZ, Contact, Freightways, Paymark.
A very staunch negotiator in my experience.
For clarity, nothing I say is advice....
-
11-12-2013, 06:29 PM
#1509
Originally Posted by peat
A very staunch negotiator in my experience.
It will interesting to see then how well she and her underlings negotiate the upcoming contract variation with CFH...Chorus's future may well depend on it.
On paper, CNU's negotiating position is not very strong and so their personal persuasiveness will need to compensate.
To foretell the future, one must first unlock the secrets of the past.
-
11-12-2013, 06:29 PM
#1510
Banned
Originally Posted by Balance
Of course the silly cow (who has presided over horrendous costs over-runs and delays) is now trying to shift the blame to others.
DO YOUR JOB, WOMAN!
As one NBR poster summarised :
"Is Chorus NZ's worst managed and worst-governed company?
Methinks they take both prizes, exceeding even the old finance companies, the old Air NZ under private ownership, Feltex, the old Telecom - jeez the list of contenders goes on and on.
Not sure why Chorus shareholders are not demanding change in directors and senior management, who cannot run a company - a regulated monopoly! - for the benefit of shareholders."
Balance kicks off with a misogynistic slur and finishes it off quoting from a random bloke (who may or may not be Balance) posting anonymously on NBR.
Consistent at least.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks