-
Which Kiwisavers do you rate?
Hi ,i keepprocastinating re signing up as i don't want to end with an insipid performance provider and making little.Whats been good for you performance wise? (Been a hard few years for gains). Being 7 years away from collecting i want to be in to collect something besides my own variable attempts in the mkts.Appreciate thoughts, cheers
-
Anywhere there are low fees are the ones to go for.
I like Superlife.
-
Member
Originally Posted by ENP
Anywhere there are low fees are the ones to go for.
I like Superlife.
I also use Superlife. I think them are the best provider.
-
Junior Member
Agreed - Superlife is the best, can pick and mix allocations to different areas and move quickly, also low fees and good service.
-
I have recently moved to Superlife based on recommendations here. The flexibility and low fees are what attracted me.
-
Originally Posted by ENP
Anywhere there are low fees are the ones to go for.
I like Superlife.
High profits should be the criterion. Noit the fees.
-
Originally Posted by fungus pudding
High profits should be the criterion. Noit the fees.
Its amazing how fees can affect the performance fungus;do you have a provider you can recco?.Thanks CJ,D B,,Lou ,how has the performance,return been. cheers
-
Member
http://www.consumersaver.org.nz/kiwi...pages/calcform
http://www.goodreturns.co.nz/kiwisav...der-table.html
Some homework for you!
Personally, I have always struggled to compare providers, as no one product is the same as another, they all appear to be structured differently, fees as well.
I started with Gareth Morgan, switched to Fisher. Currently thinking I might have a look at Milford, Superlife.
Always remember that you can change the structure (balanced/growth etc) about twice a year with most providers, no cost)
Good luck with your choice!
Last edited by karen1; 26-05-2012 at 09:25 AM.
-
Originally Posted by Joshuatree
Its amazing how fees can affect the performance fungus;do you have a provider you can recco?.Thanks CJ,D B,,Lou ,how has the performance,return been. cheers
It's the result that matters, so look for performance. A fund that has double the fees, and makes quadruple the gains would be better than simply going for low fees. Sometimes you actually do get what you pay for. I have no idea who is any good. I've taken no interest. I retired 30 odd years ago and turn 65 next year, so I just opted for the first name that come into my head that I considered safe, or likely to avoid volatility in the short time frame I had. I picked Garreth Morgan, but I'm only there for the $1k kick start and the tax credit and pay the minimum $100 per month. In the scheme of things it's so trivial that I can't be bothered even thinking about changing. I'm well set up, but if I were younger, I' d stay well clear of Morgan.
-
Member
Superlife for my wife, has good flexibility and craigs for myself I choose what shares or funds I want in it. Superlife is ahead.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks