sharetrader
Page 554 of 690 FirstFirst ... 54454504544550551552553554555556557558564604654 ... LastLast
Results 5,531 to 5,540 of 6894
  1. #5531
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    176

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    That is true as a statement in itself.

    But not true when companies use as a reason for CEOs leaving abruptly.
    Yeah, I cannot agree with you more.

  2. #5532
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Pourquoi?
    Posts
    877

    Default

    I am comfortable with this. The slide with revenue breakdown with McD's dominating highlights the sense in this transaction. It actually makes PLX strong in Australia and the challenge is to translate this into the USA. Looked closely at McD's statement and this gives me some confidence. As mentioned above gaining devs and customers makes the transaction a good move. Would love to know the forecast revenue for TASK and making assumption I would assume a modest 10% growth backing up their reason for selling. Can PLX gain one of the major supermarkets in Australia with this...

  3. #5533
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    6

    Default

    They won't be gaining many additional developers. TASK has 62 employees on LinkedIn. Only half that will be in Engineering and they have their own product to maintain, so I don't imagine there is much latent capacity to exploit. I assume they plan on integrating the two systems, which is going to take time and resources. Are the technologies that Plexure and Task are built on similar, and can resources by used across both? With Task having existed since 2000, they could be bringing a lot of legacy software to the party which will require dedicated resource to maintain. Feels to me like the board had cash in the bank that was burning a hole in their pocket and they got pretty desperate finding a way to invest it and grow the business...hopefully the upsell of Plexure software to the Task customer base can be exploited like they hope and it will be the best use of that cash!

  4. #5534
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    38,079

    Default

    So a company trading at 3.3 times sales buys a company for 8.6 times sales

    Or is that the other way around
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  5. #5535
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Little frog in a big pond
    Posts
    189

    Default

    I believe it's a good move, the alternative for Plexure is best summed up in the following classic clip...


  6. #5536
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    rural canterbury
    Posts
    1,357

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bullfrog View Post
    I believe it's a good move, the alternative for Plexure is best summed up in the following classic clip...
    Yes, I guess its true that the worst and longest death scene could be improved by speeding it up!

  7. #5537
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Little frog in a big pond
    Posts
    189

    Default

    “Upon completion, Daniel Houden will be appointed as Plexure Group CEO, filling the recentCEO vacancy, to complement the highly capable management team at Plexure. Togetherwith his brother Dean, Daniel has led the development and commercialisation of the TASKplatform - I believe Daniel and the team will be ideally positioned to deliver the exciting benefitsof this transaction,” said Mr Norman.

    Daniel Houden, CEO of TASK, said “Plexure’s personalisation engine is the perfectcomplement to our offering – it will enable us to offer our clients a world-class solution of evengreater breadth. We are excited about joining the Plexure team and accelerating the globalgrowth of the combined business.”

    I'm picturing it as the epic final scene in the good, bad, ugly. I like a smooth transition of power

  8. #5538
    Outside thinking.
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    2,563

    Default

    Mmm some figures coming out today....

    PX1 current shares = 174 mill.
    New shares issues to Task = 78.5 mill
    New Incentive shares for staff = 20 mill
    New Cap raise shares = 35 mill

    Thus post merger a total of around $307 mill (76% more shares)

    Then there's revenue; Currently FY21 PX1. = $29mill. Task = $12.9 mill TOTAL = $41 mill
    Total forecast combined FY 22 Revenue = $45 to $47 mill. (62% more revenue)

    I suspect they need to 'overdeliver' on these FY22 revenue projections.

  9. #5539
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Pourquoi?
    Posts
    877

    Default

    A conservative 5x revenue multiple on the combined group @ $43m puts the valuation @ $215m.

  10. #5540
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Schrodinger View Post
    A conservative 5x revenue multiple on the combined group @ $43m puts the valuation @ $215m.
    would be good to see them release a high level plan around growth opportunity. The last group of executives were good at tidying up loose ends/very diligent, but never was there thinking beyond 2 years. There is no "in between" for rev multipliers. Any rev multiplier lower then 5 spells slowish growth. If they can show opportunity which leads to increased rev beyond 50% growth (YOY) then they can start hitting valuations of 10+ times rev. Otherwise this merger will be another NZX sleeper. I'm curious just how fatigued this new executive team will be. 20 Plus years in their current role is beyond fatigue setting in.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •