sharetrader
Page 15 of 76 FirstFirst ... 51112131415161718192565 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 150 of 755
  1. #141
    Guru
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    3,115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Schrodinger View Post
    Anyone have or know of what happened to 42 below in its first few years?
    While it did make continual losses, this was planned (much like Xero now).

    It didn't miss sales targets.
    Free delivery worldwide with Book Depository http://www.bookdepository.co.uk

  2. #142
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,890

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SparkyTheClown View Post
    And Milford no longer have a substantial holding.

    https://www.nzx.com/companies/MOA/announcements/239872

    So they disclosed they sold 45 thou sharechat...that's all they had to disclose

    Wonder how many more they sold ..... To be consistent MOA became too risky for their clients so hopefully the lot

  3. #143
    Guru
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    3,115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SparkyTheClown View Post
    And Milford no longer have a substantial holding.

    https://www.nzx.com/companies/MOA/announcements/239872
    My maths aren't good but they have gone from 1.8m shares to 1.485m shares, yet only disclose selling 45k shares. Shouldn't they be disclosing at least 315k sold?
    Free delivery worldwide with Book Depository http://www.bookdepository.co.uk

  4. #144
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,890

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CJ View Post
    My maths aren't good but they have gone from 1.8m shares to 1.485m shares, yet only disclose selling 45k shares. Shouldn't they be disclosing at least 315k sold?
    Think they only need to disclose the actual sale that took them below the 5%

    But then again you would think that they would then say they only had that reduced number eh

    Maybe they did sell 315k The others at a lower price than the 45k and were trying to hide that loss

  5. #145
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,890

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Think they only need to disclose the actual sale that took them below the 5%

    But then again you would think that they would then say they only had that reduced number eh

    Maybe they did sell 315k The others at a lower price than the 45k and were trying to hide that loss
    Note this line on the Ann

    . Following the above trade Milford Asset Management ceased to be a substantial share holder.

    And the words THE ABOVE TRADE

  6. #146
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Pourquoi?
    Posts
    873

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moosie_900 View Post
    Wow, sell sell sell! Any price weakness in a stock and they are just selling! I don't blame them for Moa though, terrible idea even to begin with investing in them. Guess they'll be going out to buy more BFW now!
    Anyone remember the original Steinlager. Trashy, ****ty tasting export beer that was a hit outside NZ?

    So bad they had to rebrand it to Steinlager Pure to get the locals to drink it..

  7. #147
    Guru
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    3,115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Note this line on the Ann

    . Following the above trade Milford Asset Management ceased to be a substantial share holder.

    And the words THE ABOVE TRADE
    Thats not it. Selling 45k onlyl takes them down to 5.8%

    They need to sell the full 315k to take them down to 5.92%.
    Free delivery worldwide with Book Depository http://www.bookdepository.co.uk

  8. #148
    Veteran novice
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    7,289

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Schrodinger View Post
    Anyone remember the original Steinlager. Trashy, ****ty tasting export beer that was a hit outside NZ?

    So bad they had to rebrand it to Steinlager Pure to get the locals to drink it..
    That doesn't accord with my early memories of Steinlager. As I recall, it was a big hit with the yuppies of that era who had been brought up on 6 o'clock closing, draught beer by the jug and the likes of Lion Red (and Brown), DB, Champion, Wards, Speights etc - in big bottles. Not a huge selection there and very little, expensive, imported brews available. But then, I might just be looking at those times through rose coloured taste buds!

  9. #149
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,890

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CJ View Post
    Thats not it. Selling 45k onlyl takes them down to 5.8%

    They need to sell the full 315k to take them down to 5.92%.
    Maybe the 475k was the last trade then

    Then again I have seen some ssh notices that list every trade in the time period between announcements

  10. #150
    born2invest
    Guest

    Default

    MOA was always a gamble on the reputation of the Geoff Ross though wasn't it?

    If he could do it with vodka then why not with beer?

    Unfortunately they are two different products in very different markets with completely different consumers.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •